Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:05:31.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Participation as Assessment: Political Science and Classroom Assessment Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2008

Mel Cohen
Affiliation:
Miami University Middletown

Extract

From the beginning of my teaching career I had been drawn to class participation (Cohen 1991; 1993). I enjoyed posing questions and problems to the class, and they seemed to enjoy the interaction. At the same time, intuitively I was drawn to discussion and participation as ways to enhance learning. Later I learned that these were part of what was known as “active learning,” and they really did have the ability to enhance student learning (Barr and Tagg 1995; Chickering, Gamson, and Barsi 1989; Pascarella and Terenzini 2005, 101–2). My faith bolstered, I continued to explore ways to actively engage students through developing thought-provoking questions, assigning in-class writing, utilizing small group work, and integrating short presentations. Eventually I began to share my ideas with colleagues at conferences and publish them in respected journals. I discussed what I was doing in class, the basic principles underlying my approach, the challenges it provided, and the hoped-for results when it came to student learning.

Type
The Teacher
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelo, Thomas A., and Cross, K. Patricia. 1993. Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Barr, Robert B., and Tagg, John. 1995. “From Teaching to Learning: A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education.” Change, November/December, 1325.Google Scholar
Bok, Derek. 2006. Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chickering, Arthur W., Gamson, Zelda F., and Barsi, Louis M. 1989. Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education: Faculty Inventory. Racine, WI: The Johnson Foundation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Mel. 1991. “Bringing Life to the Classroom: Making Class Participation a Reality.” PS: Political Science and Politics 24 (December): 699703.Google Scholar
Cohen, Mel. 1993. “Making Critical Thinking a Classroom Reality.” PS: Political Science and Politics 26 (June): 241–4.Google Scholar
Diamond, Ann Stuart. 1980. “Decent Even Though Democratic.” In How Democratic Is the Constitution? ed. Robert A. Goldwin and William A. Schambra. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1838.Google Scholar
Earl, Lorna M. 2003. Assessment As Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Green, Andrew, and Rose, William. 1996. “The Professor's Dream: Getting Students to Talk and Read Intelligently.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29 (December): 687–90.Google Scholar
Palomba, Catherine A., and Banta, Trudy W.. 1999. Assessment Essentials: Planning, Implementing, and Improving Assessment in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Pascarella, Ernest T., and Terenzini, Partick T.. 2005. How College affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Suskie, Linda. 2004. Assessing Student Learning: A Common Sense Guide. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.Google Scholar
Tagg, John. 2003. The Learning College Paradigm. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education. 2006. A Test of Leadership: Charting the Future of U.S. Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar