Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:15:41.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neoliberalism: A Useful Tool for Teaching Critical Topics in Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2009

Lori Hartmann-Mahmud
Lori Hartmann-Mahmud
Affiliation:
Centre College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Neoliberalism is one of the most pervasive and contested concepts of our contemporary era. Thus, it is essential for students to gain an understanding of its history, meaning, assumptions, and policy prescriptions. In addition to recognizing the importance of neoliberalism in the current political discourse, I argue that the polarized responses to the concept provide opportunities for teaching about critical topics in political science. This article provides suggestions for teaching about six such topics through the lens of neoliberal policies such as free trade, structural adjustment, and privatization.

Type
The Teacher
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , October 2009 , pp. 745 - 751
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelson, Naomi. 2006. “Water Woes.” In Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Latin American Issues, ed. DeGrave, Santos-Phillips, andDegrave. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, 311–17.Google Scholar
Ballve, Teo, and Prashad, Vijay, eds. 2006. Dispatches from Latin America: On the Frontlines against Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Cal, and Roy, Kartik. 1996. Comparing Development Patterns in Asia. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Press.Google Scholar
Daly, Herman, 1997. Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Daly, Herman, and Cobb, John. 1994. For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Diana. 2006. “Neoliberalism, Environmentalism and Agricultural Restructuring in Morocco.” The Geographical Journal 172 (June): 88–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGrave, Analisa, Santos-Phillips, Eva, and DeGrave, Jeff, eds. 2007. Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Latin American Issues. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.Google Scholar
DeMartino, George. 2000. Global Economy, Global Justice: Theoretical Objections and Policy Alternatives to Neoliberalism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Soto, Hernando. 2000. The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ferguson, James. 2006. Global Shadows: Africa in the Neoliberal World Order. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1989. “The End of History.” The National Interest (Summer).Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Solt, Fred. 2004. “Successes and Failures of Neoliberalism.” Latin America Research Review 39 (3): 150–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Andrew. 2006. Dictionary of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kasper, Sherryl Davis. 2002. A Revival of Laissez-Faire in American Macroeconomic Theory: A Case Study of the Pioneers. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kesselman, Mark, ed. 2007. The Politics of Globalization: A Reader. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Nyamu-Musembi, Celestine. 2007. “De Soto and Land Relations in Rural Africa: Breathing Life into Dead Theories about Property Rights.” Third World Quarterly 28 (December): 1457–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panizza, Francisco. 2005. “Unarmed Utopia Revisited: the Resurgence of Left-of-Centre Politics in Latin America.” Political Studies 53: 716–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkerton, Evelyn, Heaslip, Robin, Silver, Jennifer J., and Furman, Kira. 2008. “Finding ‘Space’ for Comanagement of Forests within the Neoliberal Paradigm: Rights, Strategies, and Tools for Asserting a Local Agenda.” Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal 36 (June): 343–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, Vicky, and Theobald, Robin. 1998. Political Change and Underdevelopment: A Critical Introduction to Third World Politics. 2nd ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapley, John. 2002. Understanding Development: Theory and Practice in the Third World. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riely, Ray. 2007. The New Political Economy of Development. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Schwarz, John E. 2005. Freedom Reclaimed: Rediscovering the American Vision. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Seligson, Mitchell, and Passé-Smith, John, eds. 2008. Development and Underdevelopment: The Political Economy of Global Inequality. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.Google Scholar
Taylor, Marcus. 2006. From Pinochet to the “Third Way”: Neoliberalism and Social Transformation in Chile. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Michael. 2004. “Neoliberalism in Latin America.” Latin America Research Review 39 (3): 165–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Kelly, and Achinelli, Moira Laura. 2008. “Context and Contingency: The Coffee Crisis for Conventional Small-Scale Coffee Farmers in Brazil.” The Geographical Journal 174 (September): 223–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2004. “Assessing Latin American Neoliberalism.” Latin America Research Review 39 (3): 143–49.Google Scholar
Zibechi, Raul. 2006. “Privatizations: The End of a Cycle of Plundering.” In Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Latin American Issues, ed. DeGrave, Santos-Phillips, andDegrave. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, 302–10.Google Scholar