Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:46:54.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moral Issues and Voter Decision Making in the 2004 Presidential Election

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2005

D. Sunshine Hillygus  and
Todd G. Shields
D. Sunshine Hillygus
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Todd G. Shields
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“President Bush's victory, the approval of every anti-gay marriage amendment on statewide ballots and an emphasis on ‘moral values’ among voters showed the power of churchgoing Americans in this election and threw the nation's religious divide into stark relief.” Associated Press, November 4, 2004

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , April 2005 , pp. 201 - 209
Copyright
© 2005 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz Alan. 1995. “It's Abortion Stupid: Policy Voting in the 1992 Presidential Election.” Journal of Politics 57: 176–86.Google Scholar
Bartels Larry. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 35–50.Google Scholar
Burden Barry C. 2004. “An Alternative Account of the 2004 Presidential Election.” The Forum (4): http://www.bepress.com/forum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell Angus, Philip Converse, Warren Miller, and Donald Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Fiorina Morris P. 2004. “‘Holy War’ Over Moral Values or Contempt for Opinion?” San Francisco Chronicle. Sunday, November 21, B-5. http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/11/21/EDG549TD5K1.DTL.Google Scholar
Hillygus D. Sunshine, and Simon Jackman. 2003. “Voter Decision Making in Election 2000.” American Journal of Political Science 47: 583–96.Google Scholar
Jacobs Lawrence. 2004. “Moral Values Takes Back Seat to Partisanship and the Economy in the 2004 Presidential Election.” www.hhh.umn.edu/centers/csp/elections/moral_values.html.Google Scholar
Krosnick Jon A., and Lin Chiat Chang. 2001. “A Comparison of the Random Digit Dialing Telephone Survey Methodology with Internet Survey Methodology as Implemented by Knowledge Networks and Harris Interactive.” Stanford University. http://communication.stanford.edu/faculty/krosnick.html.Google Scholar
Lambro Donald. 2004. “In Search of New Faces.” Washington Times Special Report, http://washingtontimes.com/specialreport/20041107-123932-3944r.htm.Google Scholar
Meyer Dick. “The Anatomy of a Myth: How Did One Exit Poll Answer Become the Story of How Bush Won?” Washington Post. Sunday, December 5, 2004 page B01. Reprinted at www.washingtonpost.com.Google Scholar
Pineau Vicki, and Daniel Slotwiner. 2003. “Probability Samples vs. Volunteer Respondents in Internet Research: Defining Potential Effects on Data and Decision-Making in Marketing Applications.” White Paper. http://www.knowledgenetworks.com/info/main/studies.html.Google Scholar
Viscusi W. Kip, Joel Huber, and Jason Bell. 2004. “The Value of Regional Water Quality Improvements.” Discussion Paper No. 477. The Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper Series: http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar