Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:06:42.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2017

Peregrine Schwartz-Shea  and
Samantha Majic
Peregrine Schwartz-Shea
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Samantha Majic
Affiliation:
John Jay College-City University of New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Ethnography and Participant Observation: Political Science Research in this “Late Methodological Moment”
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 97 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, Paul and Hammersley, Martyn. 1994. “Ethnography and Participant Observation.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, ed. Denzin, Norman K. and Lincoln, Yvonna S., 248–60. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Brodkin, Evelyn Z. 2012. “Reflections on Street-Level Bureaucracy: Past, Present, and Future.” Public Administration Review 72 (6): 940–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, Barth, Aharon, and Rutherford, Ken. 2003. “Do We Preach What We Practice? A Survey of Methods in Political Science Journals and Curricula.” PS: Political Science & Politics 36 (3): 373–78.Google Scholar
Breman, Jan. 2015. “The Strange History of Sociology and Anthropology.” Global Dialogue: Newsletter for the International Sociological Association 5 (4); available at http://isa-global-dialogue.net/the-strange-history-of-sociology-and-anthropology/ Google Scholar
Camic, Charles and Xie, Yu. 1994. “The Statistical Turn in American Social Science: Columbia University, 1890 to 1915.” American Sociological Review 59 (5): 773–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delamont, Sara. 2007. “Ethnography and Participant Observation.” In Qualitative Research Practice, ed. Seale, Clive, Giampietri, Gobo, Gubrium, Jaber F. and Silverman, David S., 205–27. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
“Field Research: How Rich? How Thick? How Participatory?” 2006. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research (Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research) 4 (2): 9–24.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. “‘From the Native’s Point of View’: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding.” In Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology, 55–70. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Lene. 2006. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Isaac, Jeffrey C. 2015a. “Further Thoughts on DA-RT.” The Plot, November 16. www.the-plot.org/2015/11/02/further-thoughts-on-da-rt/ Google Scholar
Isaac, Jeffrey C. 2015b. “For a More Public Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 13 (2): 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Patrick T. 2014. “Making Sense of Making Sense: Configurational Analysis and the Double Hermeneutic.” In Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, ed. Yanow, Dvora and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, 2 nd edition, 267–83. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana, MacLean, Lauren M., and Read, Benjamin L.. 2015. Field Research in Political Science: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Craig. 2015. “The ‘Wild West’ of Academic Pubishing.” Harvard Magazine, January-February.Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur and Elman, Colin. 2014. “Openness in Political Science: Data Access and Research Transparency.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (1): 19–42.Google Scholar
Monroe, Kristen Renwick, ed. 2005. Perestroika! The Raucous Revolution in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
“Perestroika in Political Science: Past, Present, and Future.” 2010. Symposium. PS: Political Science & Politics 43 (4): 725–54.Google Scholar
Salemink, Oscar. 2003. “Introduction: Ethnography, Anthropology and Colonial Discourse.” In The Ethnography of Vietnam’s Central Highlanders: A Historical Contextualization, 1850–1990, 1–39. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Schatz, Edward, ed. 2009. Political Ethnography: What Immersion Brings to the Study of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Carl E. 2015. The Censor’s Hand: The Misregulation of Human-Subject Research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrag, Zachary M. 2010. Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965–2009. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Joseph. 2014. “Resisting Exploitation of the Contingent Faculty Labor in the Neoliberal University: The Challenge of Building Solidarity between Tenured and Nontenured Faculty.” New Political Science 36 (4): 504–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine 2003. “Is This the Curriculum We Want? Doctoral Requirements and Offerings in Methods and Methodology.” PS: Political Science & Politics 36 (3): 379–86.Google Scholar
van den Hoonaard, Will C. 2011. The Seduction of Ethics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanow, Dvora and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine. 2007. “The Methods Café: An Innovative Idea for Methods Teaching at Conference Meetings.” PS: Political Science & Politics 40 (2): 383–86.Google Scholar
Yanow, Dvora and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine. 2008. “Reforming Institutional Review Board Policy: Issues in Implementation and Field Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (3): 483–94.Google Scholar
Yanow, Dvora and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine. 2016. “Encountering Your IRB 2.0: What Political Scientists Need to Know.” PS: Political Science & Politics 49 (5): 277–286.Google Scholar