Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:41:34.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2016

James E. Campbell*
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo, SUNY

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Forecasting the 2016 American National Elections
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, Alan I. 1988. “An Improved Model for Predicting Presidential Outcomes.” PS: Political Science & Politics 21 (4): 843−47.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CN: Yale.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. and Saunders, Kyle L.. 1998. “Ideological Realignment in the American Electorate.” Journal of Politics 60 (3): 634−52.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 2000a. The American Campaign: US Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 2000b. “The Science of Forecasting Presidential Elections.” In Before the Vote: Forecasting American National Elections, edited by Campbell, James E. and Garand, James C., 169−87. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 2006. “Party Systems and Realignments in the United States, 1868–2004.” Social Science History 30 (3): 359−86.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 2010. “The Exceptional Election of 2008: Performance, Values, and Crisis.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 40 (2): 225−46.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 2013. “Recap: Forecasting the 2012 Election” PS: Political Science & Politics 46 (1): 3747. (A compilation of brief recaps by the different forecasters).Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 2016. Polarized: Making Sense of a Divided America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E., Dettrey, Bryan J. and Yin, Hongxing. 2010. “The Theory of Conditional Retrospective Voting: Does the Presidential Record Matter Less in Open Seat Elections?” Journal of Politics 72 (4): 1083−95.Google Scholar
Gallup. 2016. “Satisfaction With the United States,” http://www.gallup.com/poll/1669/General-Mood-Country.aspx. Accessed: July 21.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. 2008. “Incumbency, National Conditions, and the 2008 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (4): 709−12.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 2008. “Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Presidential Elections: The Historical Record.” Political Science Quarterly 123 (2): 201−28.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Richard and Lewis-Beck, Michael S.. 2001. “National Economic Voting in US Presidential Elections.” Journal of Politics 63 (1): 159−81.Google Scholar
National Bureau of Economic Research. 2016. “US Business Cycle Expansions and Contractions,” http://www.nber.org/cycles.html. Accessed: July 21.Google Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut. 2000. “Of Time and Candidates: A Forecast for 1996.” In Before the Vote: Forecasting American National Elections, eds. Campbell, James E. and Garand, James C., 5781. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2016. “Partisanship and Political Animosity in 2016” (June): 10.Google Scholar
Real Clear Politics. 2016. “Polls: Direction of Country,” http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/direction_of_country-902.html. Accessed: July 21.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Herbert F. 2002. “Partisanship and Incumbency in Presidential Elections.” Political Behavior 24 (4): 339−60.Google Scholar