Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-wjqwx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-15T08:37:49.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Engaging the Unengaged: Using Visual Images to EnhanceStudents' “Poli Sci 101” Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2009

Stacy Ulbig
Stacy Ulbig
Affiliation:
Sam Houston State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As the nation witnesses a distinct decline in civic engagement amongyoung adults, political science instructors across the nation facethe formidable task of engaging students in lower-level, generaleducation courses outside students' primary domain of interest. Theresearch presented here seeks to understand if visually enhancedlecture material can effectively engage such students better thanmore traditional methods of classroom delivery. The project utilizesan experimental design involving two different sections of the sameintroductory American government course. By exposing the sections todifferent visual presentations, and controlling for a variety ofpotentially confounding factors, the impact that simple visualimages have on student engagement both inside and outside theclassroom are isolated. Findings suggest that the use of simplevisual images can enhance students' impressions of the discipline ofpolitical science and boost their interest in and knowledge ofpolitics and public affairs more generally.

Type
The Teacher
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 385 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bartlett, R. M., and Strough, J.. 2003. “Multimedia Versus Traditional Course Instruction in Introductory Social Psychology.” Teaching of Psychology 30 (4): 335–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chanlin, L. 1997. “The Effects of Verbal Elaboration and Visual Elaboration on Student Learning.” International Journal of Instructional Media 24 (4): 333–39.Google Scholar
Chanlin, L. 1998. “Animation to Teach Students of Different Knowledge Levels.” Journal of Instructional Psychology 25 (3): 166–75.Google Scholar
Colby, A., Ehrlich, T., Beaumont, E., and Stephens, J.. 2003. Educating Citizens: Preparing America's Undergraduates for Lives of Moral and Civic Responsibility. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Comber, M.K. 2003. “Civics Curriculum and Civic Skills.” CIRCLE fact sheet, November. http://www.civicyouth.org/PopUps/FactSheets/FS_Civics_Curriculum_Skills.pdf.Google Scholar
Comber, M.K. 2005. “The Effects of Civic Education on Civic Skills.” CIRCLE Fact Sheet, October. http://www.civicyouth.org/PopUps/FactSheets/FS_05_effects_of_civic_education_on_civic_skills.pdf.Google Scholar
Erwin, T.D., and Rieppi, R.. 1999. “Comparing Multimedia and Traditional Approaches in Undergraduate Psychology Classes.” Teaching of Psychology 26: 58–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, D.K. 1994. “Analysis of Students' Perceptual Styles and Their Use of Multimedia.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 79: 643–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, Jeff. 1999. “The Insignificance of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.” Political Research Quarterly 52 (3): 647–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimpel, J.G., Lay, J.C., and Schuknecht, J.E.. 2003. Cultivating Democracy: Civic Environments and Political Socialization in America. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Greeno, J.G., Collins, A.M., and Resnick, L.B.. 1996. “Cognition and Learning.” In Handbook of Educational Psychology, ed. Berliner, D.C. and Calfee, R.C.. New York: Simon & Schuster; Macmillan, 15–46.Google Scholar
Hagen, A., Edwards, K., and Brown, A.. 1997. “The Impact of Technology on Classroom Presentations: An Empirical Investigation.” The Journal of Private Enterprise 12 (Spring): 54–68.Google Scholar
Hallett, T., and Faria, G.. 2006. “Teaching with Multimedia: Do Bells and Whistles Help Students Learn?” Journal of Technology in Human Services 24 (2): 167–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, D. 1999. “Teaching Statistics: A Comparison of Traditional Classroom and Programmed Instruction/Distance Learning Approaches.” Journal of Social Work Education 35: 343–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashemzadeh, N., and Wilson, L.. 2007. “Teaching with the Lights Out: What Do We Really Know About the Impact of Technology Intensive Instruction?” College Student Journal 41 (3): 601–12.Google Scholar
Herman, L. 1996. “Personal Empowerment.” In Teaching Democracy by Being Democratic, ed. Becker, T.L. and Couto, R.A.. Westport, CT: Praeger, 53–74.Google Scholar
Kahne, Joseph, Sporte, Susan E., and de la Torre, Marisa. 2006. Small High Schools on a Larger Scale: The First Three Years of the Chicago High School Redesign Initiative. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Kleinman, E.B., and Dwyer, F.M.. 1999. “Analysis of Computerized Visual Skills: Relationships to Intellectual Skills and Achievement.” International Journal of Instructional Media 26 (1): 53–69.Google Scholar
Levine, P. 2007. The Future of Democracy: Developing the Next Generation of American Citizens. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Liu, D., and Beamer, L.. 1997. “Multimedia as a Teaching Tool in Business Communication Course Delivery.” Business Communication Quarterly 60 (June): 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, S. 1999. “What the Survey of American College Freshmen Tells Us about Their Interest in Politics and Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 32 (June): 263–68.Google Scholar
Mattson, K. 2003. Engaging Youth: Combating the Apathy of Young Americans toward Politics. New York: The Century Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, R.E. 1997. “Multimedia Learning: Are We Asking the Right Questions?” Educational Psychologist 32: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R.E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., and Tapangco, L.. 1996. “When Less is More: Meaningful Learning from Visual and Verbal Summaries of Science Textbook Lessons.” Journal of Educational Psychology 88 (1): 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCartney, A.R.M. 2006. “Making the World Real: Using a Civic Engagement Course to Bring Home Our Global Connections.” Journal of Political Science Education 2 (1): 113–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDevitt, M., and Kiousis, S.. 2006. “Experiments in Political Socialization: Kids Voting USA as a Model for Civic Education Reform.” CIRCLE Working Paper 49. http://www.civicyouth.org/PopUps/WorkingPapers/WP49McDevitt.pdf.Google Scholar
McKay, E. 1999. “An Investigation of Text-based Instructional Materials Enhanced with Graphics.” Educational Psychology 19 (3): 323–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeil, B.J., and Nelson, K.R.. 1991. “Meta-Analysis of Interactive Video Instruction: A 10-year Review of Achievement Effects.” Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 18: 1–6.Google Scholar
Myatt, B., and Carter, D.. 1979. “Picture Preferences of Children and Young Adults.” Educational Communication and Technology Journal 27 (1): 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, R., and Junn, J.. 1998. Civic Education: What Makes Students Learn. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nowaczyk, R.H., Santos, L.T., and Patron, C.. 1998. “Student Perception of Multimedia in the Undergraduate Classroom.” International Journal of Instructional Media 25 (4): 367–82.Google Scholar
Prentice, M. 2007. “Service Learning and Civic Education.” Academic Questions 20: 135–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, E., and Hoaas, D.J.. 2001. “Does the Use of Computer-Generated Slide Presentations in the Classroom Affect Student Performance and Interest?” Eastern Economic Journal 27 (Summer): 355–66.Google Scholar
Seaman, M.A. 1998. “Developing Visual Displays for Lecture-Based Courses.” Teaching of Psychology 25: 141–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekuler, R. 1996. “Teaching Sensory Processes with Multimedia: One of My Teaching Assistants is a Mouse.” Behavior Research, Methods, Instruments & Computers 23: 282–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherry, L. 1996. “Issues in Distance Learning.” International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1 (4): 337–65.Google Scholar
Smith, S.M., and Woody, P.C.. 2000. “Interactive Effect of Multimedia Instruction and Learning Styles.” Teaching of Psychology 27: 220–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiezio, K.E., Baker, K.Q., and Boland, K.. 2005. “General Education and Civic Engagement: An Empirical Analysis of Pedagogical Possibilities.” JGE: The Journal of General Education 54 (4): 273–92.Google Scholar
Welsh, J.A., and Null, C.H.. 1991. “The Effects of Computer-Based Instruction on College Students' Comprehension of Classic Research.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 23: 301–05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetzel, C.D., Radtke, P.H., and Stern, H.W.. 1994. Instructional Effectiveness Video Media. Hinsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Press.Google Scholar
Worthington, E.L. Jr., Welsh, J.A., Archer, C.R., Mindes, E.J., and Forsyth, D.R.. 1996. “Computer-Assisted Instruction as a Supplement to Lectures in an Introductory Psychology Class.” Teaching of Psychology 23: 175–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar