Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T13:58:35.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Empowering Transparency: Annotation for Transparent Inquiry (ATI)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2021

Diana Kapiszewski Open the ORCID record for Diana Kapiszewski [Opens in a new window]  and
Sebastian Karcher Open the ORCID record for Sebastian Karcher [Opens in a new window]
Diana Kapiszewski
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Sebastian Karcher
Affiliation:
Syracuse University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Annotation for Transparent Inquiry (ATI): Transparency in Practice in Qualitative and Multi-Method Research
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 473 - 478
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bolsen, Toby, Leeper, Thomas J., and Shapiro, Matthew A.. 2014. “Doing What Others Do: Norms, Science, and Collective Action on Global Warming.” American Politics Research 42 (1): 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X13484173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, Colin, Kapiszewski, Diana, and Lupia, Arthur. 2018. “Transparent Social Inquiry: Implications for Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 21 (1): 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-091515-025429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karcher, Sebastian, Kirilova, Dessislava, and Weber, Nicholas. 2016. “Beyond the Matrix: Repository Services for Qualitative Data.” IFLA Journal 42 (4): 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035216672870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannheimer, Sara, Pienta, Amy, Kirilova, Dessislava, Elman, Colin, and Wutich, Amber. 2019. “Qualitative Data Sharing: Data Repositories and Academic Libraries as Key Partners in Addressing Challenges.” American Behavioral Scientist 63 (5): 643–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218784991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miguel, Edward, Camerer, Colin F., Katherine Casey, J. Cohen, Esterling, Kevin M., Gerber, Alan S., Glennerster, Rachel, et al. 2014. “Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research.” Science 343 (6166): 30–31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Mahoney, Joseph. 2019. “Data for: Making the Real: Rhetorical Abduection and the Bansladesh Liberation War.” Qualitative Data Repository. https://doi.org/10.5064/F6M2H9VQ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, Steve, and Jarrahi, Mohammad. 2014. “Sociotechnical Approaches to the Study of Information Systems.” In Computing Handbook, ed. Topi, Heikki and Tucker, Allen third edition. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 2015. “Data for: ‘Russia: The Politics and Psychology of Overcommitment,’ in: The Ideology of the Offensive: Military Decision Making and the Disasters of 1914.” QDR Main Collection. https://doi.org/10.5064/F6KW5CXS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar