Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:46:51.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Congressional Election Forecasting: Structure-X Models for 2014

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Michael S. Lewis-Beck
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Charles Tien
Affiliation:
Hunter College & The Graduate Center, CUNY

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: The 2014 Midterm Election Forecasts
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, Alan. 2010. “How Large a Wave? Using the Generic Ballot to Forecast the 2010 Midterm Elections.” PS: Political Science and Politics 43 (4): 631–32.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan. 2014. “Long-Term Trends and Short-term Forecasts: The Transformation of US Presidential Elections in an Age of Polarization.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (2): 289–92.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 2004. “Forecasting the Presidential Vote in 2004: Placing Preference Polls in Context.” PS: Political Science & Politics 37 (4): 763–67.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan. 2010. “The Seats in Trouble Forecast of the 2010 Elections in the U.S. House.” PS: Political Science and Politics 43 (4):627–30.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan. 2014. “Issues in Presidential Election Forecasting: Election Margins, Incumbency and Model Credibility.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (2): 289–92.Google Scholar
Cook, Charles E. Jr., and Wasserman, David. 2014. “Recalibrating Ratings for a New Normal.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (2): 304–08.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2014. “Forecasting US Presidential Elections Using Economic and Nonecomomic Fundamentals.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (2): 313–16.Google Scholar
Gallup. 2014. “Gallup Job Approval Center.” http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/Presidential-Approval-Center.aspx (June 26, 2014).Google Scholar
Graefe, Andreas, J. Armstrong, Scott, Jones, Randall J. Jr., and Cuzán, Alfred G.. 2014. “Accuracy of Combined Forecasts for the 2012 Presidential Election: The PollyVote.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (2): 427–31.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Rice, Tom W.. 1984. “Forecasting Presidential Elections: A Comparison of Naive Models.” Political Behavior 6: 921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1992. Forecasting Elections. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Stegmaier, Mary. 2013. “The V-P Function Revisited: A Survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions after over 40 Years.” Public Choice, 157 (3): 367–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 2014. “US Presidential Election Forecasting: An Introduction.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (2): 284–88.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Tien, Charles. 2008. “Forecasting Presidential Elections: When to Change the Model?International Journal of Forecasting 24 (2): 227–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linzer, Drew A. 2014. “The Future of Election Forecasting: More Data, Better Technology.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (2): 326–28.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, Stuart. 2014. “Election Forecasting and Public Opinion Polls.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (2): 336–38.Google Scholar
Stegmaier, Mary, and Lewis-Beck, Michael S.. 2013. “Economic Voting.” In Oxford Bibliographies in Political Science, online, Ed. Valelly, Rick. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. “Table 2.6. Personal Income and its Disposition, Monthly.” http://www.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?ReqID=9&step=1#reqid=9&step=3&isuri=1&903=76 (June 26, 2014).Google Scholar