Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:41:55.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ballot Regulations and Multiparty Politics in the States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2007

Barry C. Burden
Barry C. Burden
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

American politics is dominated by two major parties and has been for a century. The duopoly enjoyed by the Democrats and Republicans is largely the result of Duverger's Law: the tendency of a single-member district system to produce two-party competition (Duverger 1963). Minor parties ultimately fail in a single-member district system because (1) the winner-take-all approach does not reward candidates who finish third and (2) citizens vote strategically to avoid “wasting” their votes on hopeless candidates and spoiling the election (Cox 1997; Riker 1982). Because the U.S. two-party system is so dependent on its majoritarian electoral rules, one might suspect that other election regulations would have little effect on the number of parties.A longer version of this paper was presented at the conference, “2008 and Beyond: The Future of Election and Ethics Reform in the States,” Columbus, OH, January 16–17, 2007. I thank Richard Winger of Ballot Access News for comments and information.

Type
SYMPOSIUM
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , October 2007 , pp. 669 - 673
Copyright
© 2007 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Neal, and Brian J. Brox. 2005. “The Roots of Third Party Voting: The 2000 Nader Campaign in Historical Perspective.” Party Politics 5: 623–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argersinger, Peter H. 1980. “‘A Place on the Ballot’: Fusion Politics and Antifusion Laws.” American Historical Review 85: 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burden, Barry C. 2005. “Minor Parties and Strategic Voting in Recent U.S. Presidential Elections.” Electoral Studies 24: 603–18.Google Scholar
Collett, Christian, and Martin P. Wattenberg. 1999. “Strategically Unambitious: Minor Party and Independent Candidates in the 1996 Congressional Elections.” In The State of the Parties, 3rd ed., eds. John C. Green and Daniel M. Shea. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Disch, Lisa J. 2002. The Tyranny of the Two-Party System. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1963. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. Trans. B. North and R. North. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hirano, Shigeo, and James M. Snyder Jr. 2007. “The Decline of Third Party Voting in the United States.” Journal of Politics 69 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentz, Jacob. 2002. Electing Jesse Ventura: A Third-Party Success Story. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Peverill Squire. 1995. “The Politics of Institutional Choice: Presidential Ballot Access for Third Parties in the United States.” British Journal of Political Science 25: 419–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1999. “Toward a More Responsible Three-Party System: Plan or Obituary?” In The State of the Parties, 3rd ed., eds. John C. Green and Daniel M. Shea. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Morse, Adam, and J. J. Gass. 2006. “More Choices, More Voices: A Primer on Fusion.” Brennan Center for Justice. Available at: www.brennancenter.org/dynamic/subpages/download_file_39345.pdf.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven R. 1990. “Structure and Behavior: Extending Duverger's Law to the Japanese Case.” British Journal of Political Science 20: 335–56.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1982. “The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 76: 753–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J., Roy L. Behr, and Edward H. Lazarus. 1996. Third Parties in America, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Howard A. 1986. “Duverger's Law, Fusion, and the Decline of American ‘Third’ Parties.” Western Political Quarterly 39: 634–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strattman, Thomas. 2005. “Ballot Access Restrictions and Candidate Entry in Elections.” European Journal of Political Economy 21: 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamas, Bernard Ivan, and Matthew Dean Hindman. 2007. “Do State Election Laws Really Hurt Third-Parties? Ballot Access, Fusion, and Elections to the U.S. House of Representatives.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Winger, Richard. 1997. “Institutional Obstacles to a Multiparty System.” In Multiparty Politics in America, eds. Paul S. Herrnson and John C. Green. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Winger, Richard. 2006. “How Many Parties Ought to be on the Ballot? An Analysis of Nader v. Keith.” Election Law Journal 5: 170–200.Google Scholar