Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:51:44.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

All-Knowing or All-Nurturing? Student Expectations, Gender Roles, and Practical Suggestions for Women in the Classroom*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

Michelle Dion
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology

Extract

Student evaluations of teaching (SETs) often have important effects on promotion, tenure, and merit raises, even if only through the negative effects that poor evaluations can have on these decisions (Langbein 1994). SETs can be affected by student characteristics (class, GPA, major, expected grade, gender), class characteristics (size, required, discipline, quantitative), and professor characteristics (age, gender, race, ethnicity, personality traits). Both experiments and analysis of end-of-semester SETs in a range of disciplines and institutional settings have been used to examine the effects of each of these characteristics and the interactions among them to understand the factors that produce higher SETs.

Type
The Teacher
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, Kristi, and Miller, Elizabeth D.. 1997. “Gender and Student Evaluations of Teaching.” PS: Political Science and Politics 30 (June): 216–8.Google Scholar
Arbuckle, Julianne, and Williams, Benne D.. 2003. “Students' Perceptions of Expressiveness: Age and Gender Effects on Teacher Evaluations.” Sex Roles 49 (November): 507–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Tamara, and Blattner, Nancy. 2003. “Guarding Against Potential Bias in Student Evaluations: What Every Faculty Member Needs to Know.” College Teaching 51 (winter): 2732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basow, Susan A. 1995. “Student Evaluations of College Professors: When Gender Matters.” Journal of Educational Psychology 87 (December): 656–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basow, Susan A. 2000. “Best and Worst Professors: Gender Patterns in Students' Choices.” Sex Roles 43 (September): 407–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basow, Susan A., and Silberg, Nancy T.. 1987. “Student Evaluations of College Professors: Are Female and Male Professors Rated Differently?Journal of Educational Psychology 79 (September): 308–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Sheila Kishler. 1982. “Student Perceptions of and Expectations for Male and Female Instructors: Evidence Relating to the Question of Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 74 (April): 170–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centra, John A., and Gaubatz, Noreen B.. 2000. “Is There Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching?The Journal of Higher Education 70 (January/February): 1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Kenneth A. 1993. “College Students' Views of Male and Female College Teachers: Part II—Evidence from Students' Evaluations of Their Classroom Teachers.” Research in Higher Education 34 (April): 151211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Harvey R. 1994. “Student Evaluations of College Instructors: Effects of the Type of Course Taught, Instructor Gender and Gender Roles, and Student Gender.” Journal of Educational Psychology 86 (December): 627–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishiyama, John T., and Hartlaub, Stephen. 2002. “Does the Wording of Syllabi Affect Student Course Assessment in Introductory Political Science Classes?PS: Political Science and Politics 35 (September): 567–70.Google Scholar
Kierstead, Diane, D'Agostino, Patti, and Dill, Heidi. 1988. “Sex Role Stereotyping of College Professors: Bias in Students' Ratings of Instructors.” Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (September): 342–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbein, Laura I. 1994. “The Validity of Student Evaluations of Teaching.” PS: Political Science and Politics 27 (September): 545–53.Google Scholar
Martin, Elaine. 1984. “Power and Authority in the Classroom: Sexist Stereotypes in Teaching Evaluations.” Signs 9 (spring): 482–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeachie, Wilbert J. 1999. Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers. 10thed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
Ory, John. C. 2001. “Faculty Thoughts and Concerns about Student Ratings.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 87 (fall): 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roever, Sally, and Manna, Paul. 2005. “‘Could You Explain My Grade?’ The Pedagogical and Administrative Virtues of Grading Sheets.” PS: Political Science and Politics 38 (April): 317–20.Google Scholar
Sampaio, Anna. 2006. “Women of Color Teaching Political Science: Examining the Intersections of Race, Gender, and Course Material in the Classroom.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (October): 917–22.Google Scholar
Statham, Anne, Richardson, Laurel, and Cook, Judith A.. 1991. Gender and University Teaching: A Negotiated Difference. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Toth, Emily. 1997. Ms. Mentor's Impeccable Advice for Women in Academia. University Park: Penn State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widmeyer, Neil W., and Loy, John W.. 1988. “When You're Hot, You're Hot! Warm-Cold Effects in First Impressions of Persons and Teaching Effectiveness.” Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (March): 118–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigington, Henry, Tollefson, Nona, and Rodriguez, Edme. 1989. “Students' Ratings of Instructors Revisited: Interactions Among Class and Instructor Variables.” Research in Higher Education 30 (June): 331–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar