Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:31:03.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Administrative Accountability and the Rule of Law

The 2008 JOHN GAUS LECTURE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2009

Donald F. Kettl
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania

Extract

In June 2008, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration rocked the food industry—and food lovers—with its warning about tainted tomatoes. Consumers in New Mexico and Texas were contracting a rare, sometimes fatal strain of salmonella and the FDA feared that salmonella contamination from tomatoes was the cause. In the weeks that followed, a major outbreak spread across the country and worried consumers abandoned tomatoes. Fourth of July cookouts were not the same, and BLT lovers complained that their favorite sandwich was impossibly dry. By the end of July, the outbreak had infected more than 1,200 persons in 42 states.

Type
The 2008 John Gaus Lecture
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carothers, Thomas. 1998. “The Rule of Law Revival.” Foreign Affairs 77 (2): 96106.Google Scholar
Clark, David. 1999. “The Many Meanings of the Rule of Law.” In Law, Capitalism, and Power in Asia: The Rule of Law and Legal Institutions, ed. Jayasuriya, Kanishka. Oxford: Routledge, 2843.Google Scholar
Finer, Herman. 1941. “Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government.” Public Administration Review 1: 335–50.Google Scholar
Frederickson, H. George. 1999. “The Repositioning of American Public Administration.” PS: Political Science & Politics 32 (December): 701–11.Google Scholar
Freeman, Jody. 2003. “Extending Public Law Norms through Privatization.” Harvard Law Review 116 (March): 1285–352.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J. 1940. “Public Policy and the Nature of Administrative Responsibility.” In Public Policy, ed. Friedrich, Carl J. and Mason, E. S.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 324.Google Scholar
Gaus, John M. 1936. “The Responsibility of Public Administration.” In The Frontiers of Public Administration, ed. Gaus, John M., White, Leonard D., and Dimock, Marshall E.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2644.Google Scholar
Gaus, John M. 1950. “Trends in the Theory of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 10: 161–68.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Frank J. 1900. Politics and Administration. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
Government Accountability Office. 2007. High-Risk Series: An Update. GAO-07-310. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Accountability Office. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d07310.pdf.Google Scholar
Government Accountability Office. 2008. Defense Acquisition: Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs. GAO-08-467SP. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Accountability Office. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08467sp.pdf.Google Scholar
Ingraham, Patricia W. 2005. “‘You Talking to Me?’ Accountability and the Modern Public Service.” PS: Political Science & Politics 38 (January): 1721.Google Scholar
Kettl, Donald F. 1988. Government By Proxy: (Mis?)Managing Federal Programs. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Kettl, Donald F. 2002. “Managing Indirect Government.” In The Tools of Government: A Public Management Handbook for the Era of Third-Party Government, ed. Salamon, Lester M.. New York: Oxford University Press, 490510.Google Scholar
Kettl, Donald F. 2009. The Next Government of the United States: Why Our Institutions Fail Us and How to Fix Them. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucrats: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Lynn, Laurence E. Jr. 2007. “The Art of Governance in the 21st Century.” Paper presented at the First Annual Herbert Simon Academy, Manchester Business School, June 18. http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:7IkhnA1HcPEJ:www.mbs.ac.uk/research/hsi/newsevents/documents/LynnPresentationSimonAcademy.doc+%22constitutional+legitimacy+of+state+action%22+lynn&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us.Google Scholar
Merle, Renae. 2007. “Problems Stall Pentagon's New Fighting Vehicle.” Washington Post, February 7, A1.Google Scholar
Mosher, Frederick C. 1980. “The Changing Responsibilities and Tactics of the Federal Government.” Public Administration Review 40: 541–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neustadt, Richard. 1960. Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 2004. “Why the Rule of Law Matters.” Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 3246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radin, Beryl. 2006. Challenging the Performance Movement: Accountability, Complexity, and Democratic Values. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, David H. 2001. “Whose Bureaucracy Is This, Anyway? Congress' 1946 Answer.” PS: Political Science & Politics 34 (December): 773–77.Google Scholar
Salamon, Lester M. 1981. “Rethinking Public Management.” Public Policy 29: 255–75.Google Scholar
Salamon, Lester M., ed. 2002. The Tools of Government: A Public Management Handbook for the Era of Third-Party Government. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1987. “Political Theory and the Rule of Law.” In The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology, ed. Hutchinson, Allan C. and Moynihan, Patrick. Toronto: Carswell, 116.Google Scholar
Strayer, Joseph R. 1970. On The Medieval Origins of the Modern State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” American Political Science Review 91 (2): 245–63.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. 1887. “The Study of Administration.” Political Science Quarterly 2 (June): 197222.Google Scholar