Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:23:26.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The 2016 Ithiel de Sola Pool Lecture: Interdependence, Communication, and Aggregation: Transforming Voters into Electorates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2017

Robert Huckfeldt
Robert Huckfeldt*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special to PS
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 3 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Achen, Christopher H. and Phillips Shively, W.. 1995. Cross Level Inference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ahn, T. K., Huckfeldt, Robert, and Ryan, John B.. 2014. Experts, Activists, and Democratic Politics: Are Electorates Self-Educating? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Asch, Solomon E. 1955. “Opinions and Social Pressure.” Scientific American 193 (5): 31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1997. “The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (2): 203–26.Google Scholar
Benjamin, I. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N.. 1954. Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, Bill, with Cushing, Robert G.. 2008. The Big Sort. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 1992. Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, David and Stokes, Donald E.. 1969. Political Change in Britain. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1964. An Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, D. E., 206–61. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1969. “Of Time and Partisan Stability.” Comparative Political Studies 2 (2): 139–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael S. and Keeter, Scott. 1993. “Measuring Political Knowledge: Putting First Things First.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 179–206.Google Scholar
Dogan, Mattei and Rokkan, Stein, eds. 1974. Social Ecology. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1951 (1897). Suicide. Trans. Spaulding, J. A. and Simpson, G.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fehr, Ernst and Gächter, Simon. 2002. “Altruistic Punishment in Humans.” Nature 415: 137–140.Google Scholar
Freedman, David A. 1999. “Ecological Inference and the Ecological Fallacy.” International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences 6: 4027–30.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew. 2010. Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do. Expanded Edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Leo. 1953. “Ecological Regressions and the Behavior of Individuals.” American Sociological Review 18: 663–66.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1978. “Threshold Models of Collective Behavior.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (6): 1420–43.Google Scholar
Heberle, Rudolf. 1943a. “The Political Movements Among the Rural People in Schleswig-Holstein, 1918 to 1932, I,” Journal of Politics 5: 3–26.Google Scholar
Heberle, Rudolf. 1943b. “The Political Movements Among the Rural People in Schleswig-Holstein, 1918 to 1932, II,” Journal of Politics 5: 115–41.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert. 1983. “Social Contexts, Social Networks, and Urban Neighborhoods: Environmental Constraints on Friendship Choice.” The American Journal of Sociology 89 (3): 651–69.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert. 2001. “The Social Communication of Political Expertise.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 425–38.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Ikeda, Ken’ichi, and Pappi, Franz Urban. 2005. “Patterns of Disagreement in Democratic Politics: Comparing Germany, Japan, and the United States.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 497–514.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Johnson, Paul E., and Sprague, John. 2004. Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Levine, Jeffrey, Morgan, William, and Sprague, John. 1999. “Accessibility and the Political Utility of Partisan and Ideological Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 888–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert and Mendez, Jeanette Morehouse. 2008. “Moths, Flames, and Political Engagement: Managing Disagreement within Communication Networks.” Journal of Politics 70 (1): 83–96.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Pietryka, Matthew T., and Reilly, Jack. 2014. “Noise, Bias, and Expertise in Political Communication Networks.” Social Networks 36: 110–21.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert and Sprague, John. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Sprague, John, and Levine, Jeffrey. 2000. “The Dynamics of Collective Deliberation in the 1996 Election: Campaign Effects on Accessibility, Certainty, and Accuracy.” American Political Science Review 94 (3): 641–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Paul and Huckfeldt, Robert. 2005. “Agent Based Explanations for the Survival of Disagreement in Social Networks.” In Zuckerman, Alan S., ed. The Social Logic of Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 251–268.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Laumann, Edward O. 1973. Bonds of Pluralism. New York: Wiley Google Scholar
Lazer, David, Rubineau, Brian, Chetkovich, Carol, Katz, Nancy, and Neblo, Michael. 2010. “The Coevolution of Networks and Political Attitudes.” Political Communication 27 (3): 248–74.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, Hazel. 1968 (1944). The People’s Choice: How a Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton and Taber, Charles S.. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McKelvey, Richard D. and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1990. “A Decade of Experimental Research on Spatial Models of Elections and Committees.” In Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting, ed. Hinich, Melvin J. and Enelow, James M., 99–144. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, J. Miller and Smith-Lovin, Lynn. 1987. “Homophily in Voluntary Organizations: Status Distance and the Composition of Face-to-Face Groups.” American Sociological Review 52 (3): 370–79.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E. 1956. “One-Party Politics and the Voter Revisited.” American Political Science Review 50: 707–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57 (1): 45–56.Google Scholar
Pietryka, Matthew T., Reilly, Jack, Maliniak, Daniel M., Miller, Patrick, Huckfeldt, Robert, and Rapoport, Ronald. 2016. “From Respondents to Networks: Bridging between Individuals, Discussants, and the Networks in the Study of Political Discussion.” Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1974. “Contextual Models of Political Behavior.” Political Methodology 1: 27–61.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. S. 1950. “Ecological Correlations and the Behaviour of Individuals.” American Sociological Review 15 (3): 351–57.Google Scholar
Ross, Lee, Bierbauer, Gunter, and Hoffman, Susan. 1976. “The Role of Attribution Processes in Conformity and Dissent.” American Psychologist 31 (2): 148–57.Google Scholar
Ryan, John Barry. 2011. “Accuracy and Bias in Perceptions of Political Knowledge.” Political Behavior 33 (2): 335–56.Google Scholar
Song, Hyunjin and Eveland, William P.. 2015. “The Structure of Communication Networks Matters: How Network Diversity, Centrality, and Context Influence Political Ambivalence, Participation, and Knowledge.” Political Communication 32 (1): 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, John. 1976. “Estimating a Boudon Type Contextual Model: Some Practical and Theoretical Problems of Measurement.” Political Methodology 3: 333–53.Google Scholar
Tingsten, Herbert. 1963. Political Behavior: Studies in Election Statistics. Translated by Hammarling, V.. Totowa, N.J.: Bedminster. Originally published in 1937.Google Scholar
Watts, Duncan J. 1999. “Networks, Dynamics and the Small World Phenomenon.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (2): 493–527.Google Scholar
Wright, Gerald C. 1976. “Community Structure and Voting in the South.” Public Opinion Quarterly 40 (2): 201–15.Google Scholar