Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:26:05.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Robert Henri's Good Theory and Earnest Practice: The Humanistic Values of an American Painter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2009

Get access

Extract

Robert Henri, born in Cincinnati, Ohio, in 1865, was the acknowledged leader of the “Ash-Can” School of painters. The other members were George Luks, William J. Glackens, John Sloan, and Everett Shinn. Branded as “revolutionaries” and “apostles of ugliness” after the turn of the century, because their work and theory seemed to rub against the grain of contemporary American artistic taste and its conception of acceptable aesthetic good manners, they came into conflict with the respectable and conventional painters, critics, and art dealers in the early years of the twentieth century. Although they were a group of artists obviously in the minority, their independent exhibitions were applauded by a proportionately small—yet highly vocal—number of newspaper and magazine critics. However, it was Henri, rather than any critic, who led the way in articulating their theories and practice and who made it impossible for their work to be ignored. He was the group's intellectual spokesman, artistic catalyst, and revered father figure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. Henri, Robert, “Progress in Our National Art,” Craftsman, 15 (01 1909), 389.Google Scholar

2. Henri, Robert, The Art Spirit (Philadelphia, Penn.: J. B. Lippincott Company, 1939), p. 153.Google Scholar

3. Henri, Robert, “What about Art in America?Arts and Decoration, 24 (11 1925), 37.Google Scholar

4. Henri, , “Progress in Our National Art,” p. 391.Google Scholar

5. Quoted in Edgerton, Giles, “The Younger American Painters,” Craftsman, 13 (02 1908), 524.Google Scholar

6. Quoted in “W. J. Glackens: His Significance to the Art of His Day,” Touchstone, 7 (06 1920), 192.Google Scholar

7. Henri, , The Art Spirit, pp. 240–42, passim.Google Scholar

8. Quoted in Roberts, Mary Fanton, “John Sloan: His Art and Its Inspiration,” Touchstone, 4 (02 1919), 369.Google Scholar

9. Henri, , The Art Spirit, p. 91.Google Scholar

10. Watson, Forbes, “Robert Henri,” The Arts, 16 (09 1929), 34.Google Scholar

11. Henri, , “Progress in Our National Art,” p. 389.Google Scholar

12. Henri, , The Art Spirit, pp. 209–10.Google Scholar

13. du Bois, Guy Pene, “Robert Henri: The Man,” Arts and Decoration, 14 (11 1920), 36, 76.Google Scholar

14. Henri, , “Progress in Our National Art,” p. 390.Google Scholar

15. Henri, , “Progress in Our National Art,” p. 390.Google Scholar

16. Henri, , The Art Spirit, p. 86Google Scholar. See also pp. 87–88 for Henri's appreciation of Eakins.