Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:46:51.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Railroad-in-the-Landscape: An Iconological Reading of a Theme in American Art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2009

Leo Marx
Get access

Extract

Of all the great modern innovations, the railroad probably is the one to which American artists have accorded the largest significance. The passenger railroad first appeared on the American scene in the 1830s, and it almost immediately caught the eye of several of the nation's most gifted landscape painters. By the time of the Civil War the new machine already had been incorporated into the work of Thomas Cole, Thomas Doughty, Asher Durand, and John Kensett. The subject attracted their attention, for one thing, because of its newness — its radically innovative character-and, for another, because of its compelling visual properties. A steam-powered locomotive moving across the landscape is an arresting sight-so arresting, indeed, that its visual character alone might seem to account for the strong hold it so quickly took on the imagination of artists. Here, after all, was an imposing, mobile, man-made contrivance, a complicated mechanism wrought of dark metal in various shifting sharp-edged geometric forms; the engine's motive power was made visible by the train of cars it pulled, the surging puffs of smoke and steam (black or white or both) that trailed behind it, and the intermittent flashes of red when its fire box was open.

Type
Research Article
Information
Prospects , Volume 10 , October 1985 , pp. 77 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. Panofsky, Erwin, “Iconography and Iconology: An Introduction to the Study of Renaissance Art,” in Studies in Iconology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1939)Google Scholar; [rpt. Meaning in the Visual Arts (New York: Doubleday Anchor Books 1957), pp. 26–54].

2. Arnheim, Rudolph, Visual Thinking (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969)Google Scholar; “A Plea for Visual Thinking,” Critical Inquiry, 6 (Spring 1980), 489–97Google Scholar; Gombrich, E. H., Art and Illusion (New York: Bollingen Foundation, 1960).Google Scholar

3. Taylor, George Rogers, The Transportation Revolution, 1815–1860 (New York: Rinehart & Co., 1951).Google Scholar

4. Panofsky, , p. 30.Google Scholar

5. Hawthorne, Nathaniel, The House of the Seven Gables (New York: W. W. Norton, 1967), p. 256.Google Scholar

6. Schivelbusch, Wolfgang, The Railway Journey, Trains and Travel in the Nineteenth Century (New York: Urizon Books, 1979)Google Scholar. The first chapter is a useful summary of the argument for the importance of the railroad and the mechanization of motive power generally, as originally set forth by Werner Sombart.

7. Chandler, Alfred, The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

8. Hobsbawm, E. J., The Age of Revolution, 1789–1848 (New York: New American Library, 1962), p. 46.Google Scholar

9. Finley, M. I., “The Year One,” in Aspects of Antiquity (New York: Pelican Books, 1977), pp. 185–99.Google Scholar

10. Dublin, Thomas, Women at Work (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

11. Althusser, Louis and Balibar, Etienne, Reading Capital (New York: Pantheon Books, 1970), Chapter 10.Google Scholar

12. Emerson, Ralph Waldo, The Complete Essays and Other Writings (New York: Modern Library, 1950), p. 306.Google Scholar

13. Carlyle, Thomas, Critical and Miscellaneous Essays, Vol. 3, (New York: Bedford, Clarke & Co., n.d.), pp. 5–30Google Scholar; Walker, Timothy, “Defense of Mechanical Philosophy,” North American Review, 33 (07, 1831), 122–36Google Scholar. I discuss the argument between Carlyle, and Walker, in The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1964), pp. 170–90.Google Scholar

14. Mill, J. S., “M. de Tocqueville on Democracy in America,” Edinburgh Review, 10 1840Google Scholar, rpt. in Dissertations and Discussions: Political, Philosophical, and Historical (Boston: W. V. Spenser, 1865), 2.Google Scholar

15. “Opening of the Northern Railroad,” remarks made at Grafton and Lebanon, New Hampshire, The Writings of Daniel Webster (Boston: Little, Brown, & Co., 1903), vol. 4, pp. 105–17.Google Scholar

16. For the rhetoric of the technological sublime, see Marx, , The Machine in the Garden, pp. 190–209.Google Scholar

17. Whitman, Walt, Leaves of Grass (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1973), pp. 471–72.Google Scholar

18. Miller, Perry, The Responsibility of Mind in a Civilization of Machines (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1979), p. 198.Google Scholar

19. Dublin, , Women at WorkGoogle Scholar; Montgomery, David, Workers' Control in America (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

20. Whitehead, Alfred North, Science and the Modern World (New York: Macmillan, 1947), p. 138Google Scholar. For the indirect resistance to industrialization on the part of entire communities, see Smith, Merritt Roe, Harpers Ferry Armory and the New Technology (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1977)Google Scholar; Wallace, Anthony F. C., Rochdale (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1978)Google Scholar. For the disquiet aroused by the expulsion of the Native Americans, see Slotkin, Richard, Regeneration Through Violence (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1973)Google Scholar. For the indirect moral and aesthetic expression of anxiety aroused by industrialization, see Bender, Thomas, Toward an Urban Vision (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1975)Google Scholar, and Mitchell, Lee Clark, Witnesses to a Vanishing America (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

21. Novak, Barbara, Nature and Culture: American Landscape and Painting, 1825–1875 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980), pp. 18–33.Google Scholar

22. Thoreau, Henry David, Waiden and Other Writings (New York: Modern Library, 1950), p. 107.Google Scholar

23. Clark, Kenneth, Landscape into Art (New York: Harper & Row, 1976), pp. 6–8.Google Scholar

24. Osborn, Fail-field, Our Plundered Planet (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1948)Google Scholar; Marsh, George Perkins, Man and Nature, edited by Lowenthal, David (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1965), p. 43.Google Scholar

25. Cole, Thomas, “Essay on American Scenery,” in The American Landscape: A Critical Anthology of Prose and Poetry, edited by Conron, John (New York: Oxford University Press, 1973), pp. 568–78.Google Scholar

26. Emerson, , Complete Essays, p. 36.Google Scholar

27. Novak, , Nature and Culture, p. 169.Google Scholar

28. Emerson, , Complete Essays, p. 328.Google Scholar

29. The case is complicated, as Kenneth Maddox has shown, by the fact that the locomotive depicted in Cole's River in the Catskills is imaginary. The rail line through Cole's cherished Catskill oasis had been chartered in 1830, and by 1839 26 miles of track had been laid, but the locomotive the company had ordered was defective and it never functioned. The line was forced to use horses for power, and in 1842, the year before Cole had included the locomotive in this painting, the line had been abandoned. One can only conjecture that Cole's motives, like his conception of the Ideal in art generally, comported with the idealistic Emersonian aesthetic described above. See Maddox, Kenneth W., “The Railroad in the Eastern Landscape: 1850–1900,” in The Railroad in the American Landscape, exhibition catalog, edited by Walther, Susan Danly (Wellesley, Mass.: The Wellesley College Museum, 1981), pp. 17–33.Google Scholar

30. Panofsky, , “Iconography and Iconology,” in Meaning in the Visual ArtsGoogle Scholar. In reprinting the introduction to his 1939 Studies in Iconology, Panofsky revised it and amplified the distinction between iconography and iconology. See especially p. 32.

31. Novak, , Nature and Culture, p. 172Google Scholar; for the continuing discussion of The Lackawanna Valley, see Marx, , The Machine in the Garden, pp. 220–22Google Scholar; Cikovsky, Nicolai Jr., “George Inness and the Hudson River School: The Lackawanna Valley,” American Art Journal 2, No. 2 (Fall 1970), 52CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Maddox, , “The Railroad and the Eastern Landscape,” in The Railroad in the American LandscapeGoogle Scholar (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, forthcoming).

32. Panofsky, , “Et in Arcadia Ego: Poussin and the Elegiac Tradition,” in Meaning in the Visual Arts, pp. 295–320.Google Scholar

33. The apocalyptic implications of Rain, Steam and Speed were recognized by Theophile Gautier, who describes the painting in his History of Romanticism as “a real cataclysm. Flashes of lightning, wings like great fire-birds, towering columns of cloud collapsing under the thunderbolts, rain whipped into vapour by the wind. You would have said it was the setting for the end of the world. Through all this writhed the engine, like the Beast of the Apocalypse, opening its red glass eyes in the shadows, and dragging after it, in a huge tail, its vertebrae of carriages.” Cited by Gage, John, Turner: Rain, Steam and Speed (New York: The Viking Press, 1972), p. 33.Google Scholar

34. Stilgoe, John R., Metropolitan Corridor: Railroads and the American Scene (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

35. Walther, , “The Railroad in the Visual Arts,” in The Railroad and the American Landscape.Google Scholar