Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:40:48.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making Generations and Bearing Witness: Violence and Orality in Gayl Jones's Corregidora

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2009

Richard Hardack
Get access

Extract

In gayl jones's novel Corregidora, Ursa Corregidora, the protagonist and last member of many generations of women who have suffered from a history of abusive relationships centered around the question of reproduction, rejects the written word as a corollary of a male heterosexual violence associated with slavery. Ursa, as well as her author, must then face the question of how to narrate her family's once “written” history in nonpatriarchal terms. In this sense, Jones produces what Henry Louis Gates Jr. has notably designated as the “speakerly text” in African-American tradition, in this case one “designed to represent an oral literary tradition” and to claim that tradition as female (181). Jones's text is consequently structured around a complex sexual and literary antipathy between a primarily male-gendered violence and a female-gendered orality. Throughout the text, reproductive sexuality is constructed as written, violent, patriarchal, and immutably inscribed. By contrast, Jones posits orality as an alternative to male heterosexual desire and Western writing, which are thematically (and, in the end, too univocally) characterized as abusive. The violence that had been almost incestuously handed down from the Portuguese slaver Corregidora to a succession of black men in Ursa's family is ineradicably tied to the process of reproductive sexuality and written inscription. Homosexuality, though problematized for Ursa, is nevertheless imagined as predicated on several kinds of orality, particularly oral narrative and oral sex, that might offer the possibility of nonviolent relationships and noncoercive communication; the text never fully embraces that alternative, however, leaving both Ursa and the reader caught in a kind of closed system. The orality Ursa embraces is explicitly nonreproductive in the terms of slave breeding, the condition that Ursa desperately flees but reifies, and perhaps finally transcends. This orality provides Ursa an alternative to the essentialized genital definitions of the feminine that white slavers and black husbands impose.

Type
Research Article
Information
Prospects , Volume 24 , October 1999 , pp. 645 - 661
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Barksdale, Richard K. “Castration Symbolism in Recent Black American Fiction.” CLA Journal 29, no. 4 (06 1986): 400–13.Google Scholar
Braxton, Joanne. “Ancestral Presence: The Outraged Mother Figure in Contemporary Afra-American Writing.” Wild Women in the Whirlwind: Afra-American Culture and the Contemporary Literary Renaissance. Ed. Braxton, Joanne and McLaughlin, Andree N.. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1990: 299–315.Google Scholar
Christian, Barbara. Black Feminist Criticism: Perspectives on Black Women Writers. New York: Pergamon, 1985.Google Scholar
Coser, Stelamaris. Bridging the Americas: The Literature of Paule Marshall, Toni Morrison, and Gayl Jones. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Davison, Carol Margaret. “‘Love ‘em and Lynch ‘em’: The Castration Motif in Gayl Jones's Eva's Man.” African American Review 29, no. 3 (1995): 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Melvin. “Singing a Deep Song: Language as Evidence in the Novels of Gayl Jones.” Black Women Writers (1950–1980): A Critical Evaluation. Ed. Evans, Mari. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor, 1984: 236–48.Google Scholar
Dubey, Madhu. “Gayl Jones and the Matrilineal Metaphor of Tradition.” Signs: Journal of Women and Culture in Society 20, no. 21 (1995): 245–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, Henry Louis Jr, The Signifying Monkey: A Theory of African American Literary Criticism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Gilroy, Paul. The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double-Consciousness. London: Verso, 1993.Google Scholar
Gilroy, Paul. There Ain't No Black in the Union Jack: The Cultural Politics of Race and Nation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Gottfried, Amy S. “Angry Arts: Silence, Speech, and Song in Gayl Jones's Corregidora.” African American Review 28, no. 4 (1994): 559–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Irene. “Black Women and Music: A Survey from Africa to the New World.” The Black Women Cross-Culturally. Ed. Steady, Filomina C.. Cambridge, Mass.: Shenkman, 1981: 383–401.Google Scholar
Jones, Gayl. “About My Work.” Cited in Black Women Writers (1950–1980): A Critical Evaluation. Ed. Evans, Mari. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor, 1984: 233–35.Google Scholar
Jones, Gayl. Corregidora. Boston: Beacon, 1975.Google Scholar
Jones, Gayl. “Interview With Gayl Jones.” Conducted by Charles Rowell. Callaloo 5, no. 3 (10 1982): 32–53.Google Scholar
Jones, Gayl. Liberating Voices: Oral Tradition in African American Literature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
McKible, Adam. “‘These are the fact of the darky's history’: Thinking History and Reading Names in Four African American Texts.” African American Review 28, no. 2 (1994): 223–35.Google Scholar
Morrison, Toni. Jazz. New York: Knopf, 1992.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J.Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the World. London: Routledge, 1982.Google Scholar
Robinson, Sally. “Corregidora: Black Female Subjectivity and the Politics of Heterosexuality.” Engendering the Subject: Gender and Self-Representation in Contemporary Women's Fiction. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Tate, Claudia. “Corregidora: Ursa's Blues Medley.” Black American Literature Forum 13 (1979): 139–41.Google Scholar
Ward, Jerry Jr, “Escape from Trublem: The Fiction of Gayl Jones.” Cited in Black Women Writers (1950–1980): A Critical Evaluation. Ed. Evans, Mari. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor, 1984: 249–57. Original version in Callaloo 5, no. 3 (October 1982): 95–104.Google Scholar
Dixon, Melvin. Ride Out the Wilderness: Geography and Identity in Afro-American Literature. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Tate, Claudia. Interview with Gayl Jones. Black American Literature Forum 13 (1979): 142–48. Abridged version in Black Women Writers at Work. Ed. Claudia Tate. New York: Continuum, 1983: 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weixlmann, Joe. “A Gayl Jones Bibliography.” Callaloo 7, no. 1 (1984): 119–31.Google Scholar