1. In The Winding Passage, Essays and Sociological Journeys, 1960–1980 (Cambridge, Mass.: Abb Books, 1980), p. 331.Google Scholar

2. Cahnman, Werner J., “Toennies in America,” History and Theory, 16 (1977), 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Eisenstadt, S. N., “Studies of Modernization and Sociological Theory,” History and Theory, 13 (1974), 226CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tipps, Dean, “Modernization Theory and the Study of National Societies: A Critical Perspective,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 15 (1973), 199CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Bendix, Richard, “Tradition and Modernity Considered,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 9 (1967), 307–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Redfield, Robert, The Little Community (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1955), pp. 141–142.Google Scholar

4. Cahnman, , 157–59.Google Scholar

5. Eisenstadt, , 225.Google Scholar

6. Tipps, , 200.Google Scholar

7. Ibid., 202; Bendix, 309.

8. Tipps, , 203Google Scholar; Bendix, , 307–8.Google Scholar

9. Tipps, , 200–03Google Scholar, Eisenstadt, , 232–3Google Scholar. Tipps calls the approach dichotomous and evolutionary; Eisenstadt calls it systemic. The characteristics of each are, however, identical.

10. Tipps, , 204.Google Scholar

11. Shiner, L. E., “Tradition/Modernity: An Ideal Type Gone Astray,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 17 (1975), 247–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12. Quoted in Cahnman, , 166.Google Scholar

13. Eisenstadt, S. N., 238Google Scholar. See also his “Tradition, Change and Modernity,” in Ho, Ping-Ti, and Tsuo, Tang, eds., China in Crisis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968)Google Scholar; and Tradition, Change and Modernity (New York: Wiley, 1973).Google Scholar

14. Tipps, , 205.Google Scholar

15. Wrigley, E. Anthony, “The Process of Modernization and the Industrial Revolution in England,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 3 (1972), 258–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16. Ibid., 229.

17. Mazrui, Ali A., “From Social Darwinism to Current Theories of Modernization,” World Politics, 21 (1968), 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18. Ibid.

19. Tipps, , 201, 206–10Google Scholar; Eisenstadt, , “Studies of Modernization and Sociological Theory,” 232–33.Google Scholar

20. Quoted in Whitaker, C. S., “A Dysrhythmic Process of Political Change,” World Politics, 19 (1967), 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21. Ibid., 192; Tipps, , 214–16Google Scholar; Eisenstadt, , “Studies of Modernization and Sociological Theory,” 244.Google Scholar

22. Cahman, , pp. 160–1Google Scholar; Bender, Thomas, Community and Social Change in America (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978), pp. 41–2Google Scholar. The book of Lewis, ' is Life in a Mexican Village: Tepoztlan Restudied (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1951)Google Scholar; his theoretical criticism is “Tepoztlan Restudied: A Critique of the Folk-Urban Conceptualization of Change,” Rural Sociology, 18 (1953), 121–34.Google Scholar

23. Bender, , p. 43.Google Scholar

24. Redfield, Robert, pp. 146–47.Google Scholar

25. Douglas, Mary, “The Effects of Modernization on Religious Change,” Daedalus, 3, No. 1 (1982), 18Google Scholar; Tipps, , 213.Google Scholar

26. Tipps, , 212–13.Google Scholar

27. Gusfield, Joseph, “Tradition and Modernity: Misplaced Polarities in the Study of Social Change,” American Journal of Sociology, 72 (1967), 351–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28. Eisenstadt, , “Studies of Modernization and Sociological Theory,” 237.Google Scholar

29. Schwartz, Benjamin I., “The Limits of Tradition Versus Modernity' as Categories of Explanation: The Case of Chinese Intellectuals,” Daedalus, 101, No. 2 (1967), 74–76, 71.Google Scholar

30. Ibid., 76.

31. Ibid., 72.

32. Eisenstadt, , “Studies of Modernization and Sociological Theory,” 236–37.Google Scholar

33. Wrigley, E. Anthony, “Reflections on the History of the Family,” Daedalus, 106, No. 2 (1977), 81.Google Scholar

34. Ibid.

35. Whitaker, , 210–15, 217.Google Scholar

36. Tipps, , 223.Google Scholar

37. Shiner, , 252.Google Scholar

38. Bendix, , 317.Google Scholar

39. Inkeles, Alex, “Convergence and Divergence in Industrial Societies,” in Altir, Mustafa O., Holzner, Burkart, and Suda, Zdenek, eds., Directions of Change: Modernization Theory, Research, and Realities (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1981), pp. 3–8.Google Scholar

40. For representative works see Inkeles, Alex and Smith, David H., Becoming Modern: Individual Change in Six Developing Countries (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Inkeles, Alex and Levenson, Daniel J., “National Character: The Study of Modal Personality and Sociocultural Systems”Google Scholar in Lindzey, and Aronson, , Handbook of Social Psychology (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968)Google Scholar; Inkeles, Alex, “The Fate of Personal Adjustment in the Process of Modernization,” International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 11, No. 2 (1970), 81–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Inkeles, Alex, “Modernization and Family Patterns: A Test of Convergence Theory,” in Hoover, Dwight W. and Koumoulides, John T. A., eds., Conspectus of History: Focus on Family History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981)Google Scholar; Inkeles, Alex and Diamond, Larry, “Personal Development and National Development: A Cross-National Perspective,” in Szalai, Alexander and Andrew, Frank M., eds., The Quality of Life: Comparative Studies (London: Sage Publications, 1980)Google Scholar; Moore, Wilbert E., “Modernization as Rationalization: Processes and Restraints,” in Nash, Manning, ed., Essays on Economic Development and Cultural Change in Honor of Bert F. Hoselitz, Supplement to Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 25 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977)Google Scholar; Moore, Wilbert E., “A Reconsideration of Theories of Social Change,” American Sociological Review, 25 (1960), 810–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Moore, Wilbert E., Social Change (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1963)Google Scholar; and Moore, Wilbert E., World Modernization: The Limits of Convergence (New York: Elsevier, 1979).Google Scholar

41. Inkeles, , “Convergence and Divergence in Industrial Societies,” 8.Google Scholar

42. Portes, Alijandra, “The Factorial Structure of Modernity: Empirical Replications and a Critique,” American Journal of Sociology, 79 (1973), 245–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43. Black, Cyril E., The Dynamics of Modernization: A Study in Comparative History (New York: Harper, 1967).Google Scholar

44. Ibid., 7.

45. Brown, Richard D., “Modernization: A Victorian Climax,” American Quarterly, 27 (1975), 533–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brown, Richard D., “Modernization and the Modern Personality in Early America, 1600–1865: A Sketch of a Synthesis,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 2 (1972), 201–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Brown, Richard D., Modernization: The Transformation of American Life, 1600–1865 (New York: Hill and Wang, 1976)Google Scholar. As may be assumed by the titles, the articles and book contain the same theme and ideas. The early article is a précis of the books and the later one is an extension of the concept of modernization to cover events at the turn of the century.

46. Brown, , “Modernization and the Modern Personality in Early America, 1600–1865,” 202, 215–16Google Scholar; Brown, , Modernization: The Transformation of American Life, 1600–1865, pp. 7–13.Google Scholar

47. Brown, , Modernization: The Transformation of American Life, 1600–1865, pp. 7–8.Google Scholar

48. Ibid., 9–13.

49. Ibid., 34; Brown, , “Modernization and the Modern Personality in Early America, 1600–1865,” 206.Google Scholar

50. Brown, , “Modernization and the Modern Personality in Early America,” 207.Google Scholar

51. Brown, , Modernization: The Transformation of American Life, 1600–1865, pp. 75–6, 95.Google Scholar

52. Ibid., 102.

53. Ibid., 95.

54. Ibid., 103–11.

55. Ibid., 147.

56. Ibid., 164–169.

57. Shorter, Edward, “Capitalism, Culture and Sexuality: Some Competing Models,” Social Science Quarterly, 53 (1972), 338–56Google Scholar; “Illegitimacy, Sexual Revolution and Social Change in Europe, 1750–1900,” Interdisciplinary History, 2 (1971), 237–72Google Scholar; The Making of the Modern Family (New York: Basic Books, 1975).Google Scholar

58. Shorter, , The Making of the Modern Family, pp. 19–20.Google Scholar

59. Ibid., 3.

60. Ibid., 255.

61. Ibid., 82–83.

62. Ibid., 7, 242.

63. Smith, Daniel Scott, “Parental Power and Marriage Patterns,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 35 (1973), 419–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smith, and Hindus, Michael S., “Premarital Pregnancy in America, 1640–1971: An Overview and Interpretation,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 5 (1975), 537–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

64. Smith, , “Parental Power and Marriage Patterns,” 426.Google Scholar

65. Ibid., 421.

66. Ibid., 422–25.

67. Smith, and Hindus, , “Premarital Pregnancy in America, 1640–1971,” 537.Google Scholar

68. Ibid., 553.

69. Ibid., 559.

70. Lantz, Herman R., Schmitt, Raymond L., and Herman, Richard, “The Preindustrial Family in America: A Further Examination of Early Magazines,” American Journal of Sociology, 79 (1973), 566–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

71. Furstenberg, Frank F., “Industrialization and the American Family: A Look Backward,” American Sociology Review, 31 (1966), 329–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

72. Henretta, James, “Families and Farms: Mentality in Pre-Industrial America,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd Series, 35 (1978), 3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also his “The Morphology of New England Society in the Colonial Period,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 11 (1971), 379–98.Google Scholar

73. Henretta, “Families and Farms,” 6, 27–28.

74. Ibid., 20.

75. Ibid.

76. Ibid., 25.

77. Jedry, Christopher, The World of John Cleaveland: Family and Community in Eighteenth-Century New England (New York: W. W. Norton, 1979).Google Scholar

78. Ibid., xii-xiii.

79. Ibid., 70.

80. Ibid., 152–53.

81. Ibid., 164–65.

82. Jensen, Richard and Friedberger, Mark, Education and the Modernization of the Midwest (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978)Google Scholar; Jensen, , Illinois (New York: W. W. Norton, 1978)Google Scholar; “Midwestern Transformation: From Traditional Pioneers to Modern Society,” Local History Today (Indianapolis: Indiana Historical Society, 1979)Google Scholar; The Winning of the Midwest: Social and Political Conflict, 1888–1896 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971).Google Scholar

83. Jensen, , “Midwestern Transformation: From Traditional Pioneers to Modern Society,” 6.Google Scholar

84. Ibid., 7. No empirical data are given and Jensen fails to account for the impact of either high infant mortality rates or high migration rates on kinship networks. The existence of three times as many adult relatives, even if substantiated, would not of itself demonstrate kin ties unless those relatives lived to gether in stable communities and persisted. He presents no evidence for either condition.

85. Ibid., 9.

86. Ibid., 9–11.

87. Jensen, , The Winning of the Midwest, pp. xii, 62–63Google Scholar; Illinois, pp. 55–56.Google Scholar

88. Jense, , The Winning of the Midwest, p. 68.Google Scholar

89. Inkeles, and Smith, , Becoming Modern: Individual Change in Six Developing Countries, p. 25.Google Scholar

90. Wrigley, E. A., “The Process of Modernization and the Industrial Revolution in England,” 229Google Scholar; “Reflections on the History of the Family,” 81.Google Scholar

91. Bendix, , 326.Google Scholar

92. Stone, Lawrence W., “Family History in the 1980s,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 12 (1981), 83.Google Scholar

93. Ibid., 60.

94. Ibid., 58.

95. Lasch, Christopher, “The Family and History,” The New York Review of Books, 18 (13 11 1975), pp. 33–38Google Scholar; “The Emotions of Family Life,” The New York Review of Books, 19 (27 11 1975), pp. 37–42Google Scholar; “What the Doctor Ordered,” The New York Review of Books, 22 (11 11 1975), pp. 50–54Google Scholar; “The Family as Haven in a Heartless World,” Salmagundi, 35 (1976), 42–55Google Scholar; “The Waning Private Life,” Salmagundi, 36 (1977), 3–15.Google Scholar

96. Lasch, , “The Family and History,” p. 33.Google Scholar

97. Ibid., 36.

98. Lasch, , “The Emotions of Family Life,” p. 41.Google Scholar

99. Lasch, , “What the Doctor Ordered,” p. 50.Google Scholar

100. Lasch, , “The Family and History,” p. 35.Google Scholar

101. Ibid., 34.

102. Lasch, , “The Emotions of Family Life,” pp. 37–38.Google Scholar

103. Ibid., 41; Lasch, , “What the Doctor Ordered,” p. 50.Google Scholar

104. Lasch, , “The Emotions of Family Life,” p. 42.Google Scholar

105. Lasch, , “What the Doctor Ordered,” p. 53.Google Scholar

106. Hareven, Tamara K., Amoskeag: Life and Work in an American Factory-City (New York: Pantheon Books, 1979)Google Scholar; “Family Time and Industrial Time: Family and. Work in a Planned Corporation Town, 1900–1924,” in Family and Kin in Urban Communities, edited by Hareven, Tamara K. (New York: Franklin Watts, New Viewpoints, 1977)Google Scholar; “The Laborers of Manchester, New Hampshire, 1912–1922: The Role of Family and Ethnicity in Adjustment to Industrial Life,” Labor History, 16 (1975), 249–265Google Scholar; “Modernization and Family History: Perspectives on Social Change,” Signs, 2 (1976), 190–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

107. Hareven, , “Family Time and Industrial Time: Family and Work in a Planned Corporation Town, 1900–1924,” pp. 192–93Google Scholar; “The Laborers of Manchester, New Hampshire, 1912–1922: The Role of Family and Ethnicity in Adjustment to Industrial Life,” 253–57.Google Scholar

108. Ibid., 260.

109. Hareven, , “Modernization and Family History: Perspectives on Social Change,” 197.Google Scholar

110. Hareven, , “The Laborers of Manchester, New Hampshire, 1912–1922: The Role of Family and Ethnicity in Adjustment to Industrial Life,” 249–50.Google Scholar

111. Hareven, , “Modernization and Family History: Perspectives on Social Change,” 203.Google Scholar

112. Ibid., 193–95. In her popular and authoritative book, Here to Stay: American Families in the Twentieth Century (New York: Hill and Wang, 1975)Google Scholar, Mary Jo Bane, using data from Katz's study of households in Hamilton, Ontario, in the 1850s, concludes that boarders moved out in that decade but that kin remained.

113. Ibid., 204–05.

114. McLaughlin, Virginia Yans, “Patterns of Work and Family Organization: Buffalo's Italians,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 2 (1971), 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

115. Ibid., 302.

116. Bodnar, John, Simon, Roger, and Weber, Michael P., Lives of Their Own: Blacks, Italians, and Poles in Pittsburgh, 1900–1960 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1982).Google Scholar

117. For an historical treatment of this position, see Greenfield, Sidney M. “Industrialization and the Family in Sociological Theory,” American Journal of Sociology, 67 (1961), 312–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Adams, Bert N., “Isolation, Function, and Beyond: American Kinship in the 1960s,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32 (1970), 575–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sussman, Marvin B., “The Isolated Nuclear Family: Fact or Faction?” Social Problems, 6 (1959), 333–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sussman, and Burchinal, Lee, “Kin Family Network: Unheralded Structure in Current Conceptualizations of Family Functioning,” Marriage and Family Living, 25 (1962), 231–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

118. Adams, , “Isolation, Function, and Beyond: American Kinship in the 1960s,” 580.Google Scholar

119. Sussman, , “The Isolated Nuclear Family: Fact or Fiction?” 334–37Google Scholar; see also his “Family Continuity: Selective Factors Which Affect Relationships Between Families at Generation Levels,” Marriage and Family Living, 16 (1954), 112–20Google Scholar; and Sussman, Marvin B. and White, R. Clyde, Hough Area: A Study of Social Life and Change (Cleveland: Western Reserve University Press, 1959).Google Scholar

120. Sussman, and Burchinal, , “Kin Family Network: Unheralded Structure in Current Conceptions of Family Functioning,” 237.Google Scholar

121. Sussman, , “The Isolated Nuclear Family: Fact or Fiction?” 339.Google Scholar

122. Adams, , “Isolation, Function, and Beyond: American Kinship in the 1960s,” 575.Google Scholar

123. Sussman, and Burchinal, , “Kin Family Network: Unheralded Structure in Current Conceptions of Family Functioning,” 235Google Scholar; Greenfield, , “Industrialization and the Family in Sociological Theory,” 318.Google Scholar

124. Inkeles, and Smith, , Becoming Modern: Individual Change in Six Developing Countries, p. 26.Google Scholar

125. Inkeles, Alex, “Modernization and Family Patterns: A Test of Convergence Theory,” in Conspectus of History, edited by Hoover, Dwight W. and Koumoulides, John T. A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 31–33.Google Scholar

126. Ibid., 34.

127. Ibid., 36–40.

128. Ibid., 42.

129. Ibid., 46.

130. Ibid., 47–48.

131. Ibid., 49.

132. Ibid., 52.

133. Ibid., 54.

134. Robert, S. and Lynd, Helen M., Middletown: A Study in Modern American Culture (New York and London: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., 1929; Harvest Book, 1956)Google Scholar; Lynd, and Lynd, , Middletown in Transition: A Study in Cultural Conflicts (Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., 1937; Harvest Books, 1965).Google Scholar

135. Lynd, and Lynd, , Middletown, p. 110.Google Scholar

136. Lynd, and Lynd, , Middletown in Transition, p. 146.Google Scholar

137. Bahr, Howard M., Caplow, Theodore, and Leigh, Geoffrey K., “The Slowing of Modernization in Middletown,” Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 3 (1980), 219–32.Google Scholar

138. Ibid., 221.

139. Ibid., 228–30.

140. Ibid., 223.

141. Ibid., 226.

142. Ibid., 231.

143. Caplow, Theodore et al. , Middletown Families: Fifty Years of Change and Continuity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982).Google Scholar

144. Ibid., 323.

145. Ibid., 329.

146. Ibid., 223–24.

147. Ibid., 200–03.

148. Ibid., 342.

149. Ibid., 221.

150. Ibid., 197–98.

151. Shorter, , The Making of the Modern Family, p. 249.Google Scholar

152. Moore, , World Modernization: The Limits of Convergence, p. 58.Google Scholar

153. Acquaviva, S. S., The Decline of the Sacred in Industrial Society (New York: Harper and Row, 1979).Google Scholar

154. Ibid., 54.

155. Ibid., 43–44, 55.

156. Ibid., 174.

157. Douglas, Mary, “The Effects of Modernization on Religious Change,” Daedalus, 3, No. 1 (1982), 1.Google Scholar

158. Ibid., 2–3.

159. Ibid., 5–7.

160. Ibid., 7.

161. Ibid., 8.

162. Ibid., 18.

163. Bell, Daniel, “The Return of the Sacred? The Argument on the Future of Religion,” in The Winding Passage: Essays and Sociological Journeys, 1960–1980 (Cambridge: Abb Books, 1980), p. 329Google Scholar. See also Greeley, Andrew's Unsecular Man: The Persistence of Religion (New York: Schocken, 1972), p. 65Google Scholar, which quotes Clifford Geertz as saying that religious belief coexists with skepticism in both traditional and modern societies.

164. Bell, , “The Return of the Sacred? The Argument on the Future of Religion,” p. 328.Google Scholar

165. Ibid., 329.

166. Ibid., 347.

167. Ibid., 331, n. 7.

168. Ibid., 331.

169. Ibid., 349–53.

170. Greeley, , Unsecular Man: The Persistence of Religion, pp. 7–14.Google Scholar

171. Ibid., 17.

172. Ibid., 35.

173. Jensen, Richard, “The Lynds Revisited,” Indiana Magazine of History, 75, No. 4 (1979), 315.Google Scholar

174. Lynd was a graduate of Union Theological Seminary and a Presbyterian minister. The Institute for Social and Religious Research was a Rockefellerbacked group whose aim was, in part, to work for a stronger religious base in industrial America. For information on the Institute see, Harvey, Charles E., “Robert S. Lynd, John D. Rockefeller, Jr., and Middletown,” speech given at the Northern Indiana Historical Society Annual Meeting, Muncie, Indiana, 15 09, 1981.Google Scholar

175. Lynd, Helen Merrell, “Middletown,”Google Scholar speech given at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting and printed in Community Section Newsletter, ed. Philip Olson, 10, No. 1 (1980), 1.Google Scholar

176. Jensen, , “The Lynds Revisited,” 316.Google Scholar

177. Ibid., 315.

178. Caplow, Theodore and Bahr, Howard M., “Half a Century of Change in Adolescent Attitudes: Replication of a Middletown Survey by the Lynds,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 43 (1979), 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Caplow, Theodore, “The Measurement of Social Change in Middletown,” Middletown III Project, Paper no. 4A, p. 3. This paper also appeared as “Evaluation des changements sociaux à Middletown,” in Hommage à Jean Stoetzel (Paris: CNRS, 1979).Google Scholar

179. Caplow, , “The Measurement of Social Change in Middletown,” p. 4Google Scholar; “The Future of Religion in Middletown,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, Baltimore, Maryland, 29 10, 1981, p. 10.Google Scholar

180. Caplow, , “The Future of Religion in Middletown,” p. 10.Google Scholar

181. Ibid., 21.

182. Ibid., 22–23; Caplow, Thedore, “Looking for Secularization in Middletown,” talk given to the annual meeting of the Friends of Bracken Library, 27 04, 1982, p. 5.Google Scholar

183. “Looking for Secularization in Middletown,” p. 6Google Scholar; “The Future of Religion in Middletown,” pp. 23–24.Google Scholar

184. “The Future of Religion in Middletown, p. 24.Google Scholar

185. Ibid.

186. Caplow, , “Looking for Secularization in Middletown,” p. 7.Google Scholar