Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T01:23:13.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Light of Reflection: Hawthorne and the Luminist Sublime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2009

Gayle L. Smith
Get access

Extract

Several months after Hawthorne's “Foot-prints on the Sea-shore” appeared in the January, 1838 Democratic Review, Elizabeth Peabody brought a copy to Emerson, who recorded in his journal the next day, “I complained that there was no inside to it.” Emerson's cool reaction notwithstanding, “Foot-prints,” along with a number of Hawthorne's other sketches and extended descriptions of nature, rewards much closer reading if we are interested in his complex aesthetic and philosophical responses to landscape. In fact, Hawthorne's depictions of nature reveal a particularly “inside” view, reflecting and inviting the meditative, contemplative response to nature articulated by Kant and embodied by the group of 19th-century American painters we now know as the luminists. His notebooks are filled with detailed descriptions of landscape, clouds, and light; some are almost specific enough to sound like painters' verbal sketches to be consulted later in the studio. While he frequently mentions Claude Lorrain and the picturesque tradition, his close attention to nature betrays a profound interest in elements that were to become the focus of the luminists in the 1850s and 1860s. Prolonged consideration of a landscape or seascape seems to lead Hawthorne significantly beyond the available, almost codified aesthetic of the picturesque to a way of representing nature and the individual's relationship to it that is more subjective, meditative, and open-ended. Hawthorne's later reactions to specific paintings, especially those of J. M. W. Turner and the Pre-Raphaelites, also suggest strongly that he would have found a far closer match to his sensibilities in many of the canvases of the luminists, especially Martin Johnson Heade and John Frederick Kensett, than those of his more immediate contemporaries, Thomas Cole and the other Hudson River School painters.

Type
Research Article
Information
Prospects , Volume 16 , October 1991 , pp. 171 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. Plumstead, A. W. and Hayford, Harrison, eds., The Journals and Miscellaneous Notebooks of Ralph Waldo Emerson (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1969), vol. 7, p. 21.Google Scholar

2. For example, Barbara Novak connects luminism with transcendentalism, calling Fitz Hugh Lane “the most transparent eyeball” in her American Painting of the Nineteenth Century (New York: Praeger, 1969), p. 110Google Scholar. See also her Nature and Culture (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980)Google Scholar and Chmaj, Betty E., “The Journey and the Mirror: Emerson and the American Arts,” Prospects 10 (1985): 353–408, esp. pp. 385–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar, “Painting: From Emerson to the Luminists – ‘Concentrated Eternity.’” In my “Emerson and the Luminist Painters: A Study of Their Styles,” American Quarterly 37, no. 2 (1985): 193–215Google Scholar, I take a stylistic perspective that leads to an appreciation of important differences between Emerson and the luminists. Barton Levi St. Armand poses questions about interdisciplinary comparisons both in his “Luminism in the Work of Henry David Thoreau: The Dark and the Light,” The Canadian Review of American Studies 11, no. 1 (Spring 1980): 13–30Google Scholar, and in “Fine Fitnesses: Dickinson, Higginson, and Literary Luminism,” Prospects 14 (1989): 141–73Google Scholar. Schneider, Richard J. considers Thoreau and a range of painting styles in “Thoreau and Nineteenth-Century American Landscape Painting,” ESQ 31, no. 2 (1985): 67–88Google Scholar. Wilmerding, John et al. , American Light: The Luminist Movement: 1850–1875 (Washington, D.C.: The National Gallery of Art, 1980)Google Scholar is the catalogue to the 1980 exhibit; individual essays in it are cited throughout this essay.

3. Armand, St., “Fine Fitnesses,” p. 166.Google Scholar

4. Baur, John's “American Luminism, A Neglected Aspect of the Realist Movement in Nineteenth-Century American Painting” appeared in Perspectives USA 9 (Autumn 1954): 90–98Google Scholar. For a more detailed discussion of Baur's observations and a brief history of other art historians' responses, see Wilmerding, 's “Introduction” to American Light, pp. 11–20.Google Scholar

5. Wilmerding, , “Introduction,” pp. 12–14.Google Scholar

6. Novak, Barbara, “On Defining Luminism,” American Light, pp. 23–29.Google Scholar

7. Novak, , American Painting, p. 95Google Scholar. In chapter 5, “Luminism: An Alternative Tradition,” Novak treats at greater length the conceptual and philosophical underpinnings she attributes to the luminist mode of seeing. She also argues for the existence of luminism in still life, genre, and portrait painting, but here I consider luminism only as it pertains to landscape.

8. Novak, , “On Defining Luminism,” American Light, p. 29.Google Scholar

9. For a succinct discussion of the Claudian conventions, Gilpin's work, and Cole in particular, see Andrus, Lisa Fellows, “Design and Measurement in Luminist Art,” American Light, pp. 31–56, esp. pp. 32–33.Google Scholar

10. Howat, John K., The Hudson River and Its Painters (New York: Penguin Books, 1978), p. 32.Google Scholar

11. Mellow, James R., Nathaniel Hawthorne in His Times (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1980), p. 135Google Scholar. Photographs of the two paintings of Lake Como appear in an article by Idol, John K. Jr., “Hawthorne on Sophia's Paintings of Lake Como,” The Hawthorne Society Newsletter 10, no. 2 (Fall 1984): 11.Google Scholar

12. For discussions of the structure of Heade's many paintings and drawings of marsh scenes, see Andrus, , “Design and Measurement,” American Light, esp. p. 46Google Scholar; and Powell, Earl A.'s “Luminism and the American Sublime,” American Light, pp. 69–94, esp. pp. 82–83.Google Scholar

13. Andrus, , “Design and Measurement,” American Light, p. 33.Google Scholar

14. Levy, Leo B., “Hawthorne and the Sublime,” American Literature 37, no. 4 (1966): 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15. Powell, , “Luminism and the American Sublime,” American Light, pp. 69–94.Google Scholar

16. Kesselring, Marion L., “Hawthorne's Reading, 1832–1850,” Bulletin of the New York Public Library 53, no. 2 (02 1949): 57.Google Scholar

17. Cole, Thomas, “Essay on American Scenery,” The American Monthly Magazine, new series, 1 (01 1836)Google Scholar; reprinted in American Art, 1700–1960: Sources and Documents, ed. Coubrey, John W. (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1965), pp. 98–110.Google Scholar

18. Novak, , Nature and Culture, p. 39Google Scholar. See chapter 3, “Sound and Silence: Changing Concepts of the Sublime,” for more information on the history of this change in aesthetics. The Henry Tuckerman quotation comes from his Book of the Artists (1867; rept. New York: James F. Carr, 1966), p. 512.Google Scholar

19. Armand, St., “Luminism,” p. 23.Google Scholar

20. Schneider, , “Thoreau,” p. 70Google Scholar. Schneider cites Swan, Mabel Munson's The Atheneum Gallery 1827–1873 (Boston: Boston Atheneum, 1940).Google Scholar

21. Mellow, , Nathaniel Hawthorne, pp. 73, 161.Google Scholar

22. Charvat, William et al. , eds., The Centenary Edition of the Works of Nathaniel Hawthorne (Columbus, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 1968– ), 20 volsGoogle Scholar. to date. Volumes cited here: vol. 2, The House of the Seven Gables; vol. 5Google Scholar, Our Old Home; vol. 8Google Scholar, The American Notebooks; vol. 9Google Scholar, Twice-Told Tales; vol. 10Google Scholar, Mosses from an Old Manse; vol. 11Google Scholar, The Snow Image and Uncollected Tales; and vol. 14, The French and Italian Notebooks. References to Hawthorne's writings are to the Centenary Edition, unless otherwise noted, and are cited parenthetically in the text by volume and page number, as here (8:161).

23. Gilpin's line engraving of various mountain shapes appeared as plate III in Observations on Several Parts of England, Particularly the Mountains and Lakes of Cumberland and Westmoreland, Relative Chiefly to Picturesque Beauty, Made in the Year 1772 (London, 1808), vol. IGoogle Scholar. The engraving is reprinted in Huntington, David C., “Church and Luminism: Light for America's Elect,” American Light, p. 166.Google Scholar

24. Levy, Leo B., “Picturesque Style in The House of the Seven Gables,” New England Quarterly 39, no. 2 (1966): 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25. Wilmerding, , “The Luminist Movement: Some Reflections,” American Light, p. 108.Google Scholar

26. Naef, Weston, in “‘New Eyes’ – Luminism and Photography,” American Light, pp. 266–89Google Scholar, shows how concerns for light and composition in outdoor landscape followed a course similar to that of painting. Interestingly, the earliest luminist treatments that he discusses were done by Boston daguerrotypists Albert S. Southworth and Josiah J. Hawes about 1850 (pp. 268–69).

27. Howat, , The Hudson River, pp. 41, 43.Google Scholar

28. Ferguson, Alfred R., Spiller, Robert E. et al. , eds., The Collected Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971– ), 4 volsGoogle Scholar. to date; here vol. 1, Nature, Addresses, and Lectures, p. 14Google Scholar.

29. Ferguson, et al. , Collected Works, vol. 2Google Scholar, Essays, First Series, p. 215.Google Scholar

30. Stewart, Randall, ed. The English Notebooks (New York: Russell and Russell, 1962), p. 615.Google Scholar

31. For a detailed consideration of Hawthorne's responses to the Manchester Exhibition, see Gollin, Rita's “‘Getting a Taste for Pictures’: Hawthorne at the Manchester Exhibition,” in The Nathaniel Hawthorne Journal, 1977, ed. Clark, C. E. Frazer Jr., (Detroit: Bruccoli Clark, 1980), pp. 81–97Google Scholar. Gollin's article includes photographs of a number of the paintings that Hawthorne discusses in his English Notebooks.

32. Stebbins, Theodore E. Jr., “Luminism in Context: A New View,” American Light, p. 213.Google Scholar

33. For another recent reevaluation of the sketches, see Van Tassel, Mary M.'s “Hawthorne, His Narrator, and His Readers in ‘Little Annie's Ramble,’” ESQ 33, no. 3 (1987): 168–79Google Scholar. Van Tassel does not find Hawthorne's sketches especially pictorial but does find the movement of the narrator's mind and feelings of primary importance. While she is interested here in the narrator's responses to social forces, I am concerned with his responses to natural forces.

34. Stein, Roger B., Seascape and the A merican Imagination (New York: Clarkson N. Potter, 1975), p. 2.Google Scholar

35. Levy, , “Hawthorne and the Sublime”, p. 392.Google Scholar

36. Wilmerding, , “The Luminist Movement,” American Light, p. 134.Google Scholar

37. Stein, , Seascape, p. 40.Google Scholar

38. Novak, , Nature and Culture, p. 185.Google Scholar

39. Novak, , American Painting, p. 101.Google Scholar

40. Torrey, Bradford and Allen, Francis, eds., The Writings of Henry David Thoreau (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, and Company, 1906), vol. 10 of Journals, pp. 96–97.Google Scholar

41. Novak, , “On Defining Luminism,” American Light, pp. 27–28.Google Scholar

42. McKinsey, Elizabeth, Niagara Falls: Icon of the American Sublime (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), p. 31.Google Scholar

43. Powell, , “Luminism and the American Sublime, American Light, p. 69.Google Scholar

44. Mellow, , Nathaniel Hawthorne, p. 51.Google Scholar

45. For a discussion of Hinton's frontispieces and illustrations of Wall's and Cole's views, see McKinsey, , Niagara Falls, pp. 1–3, 207.Google Scholar

46. McKinsey, , Niagara Falls, p. 310 n. 10.Google Scholar

47. McKinsey, , Niagara Falls, p. 202Google Scholar. She cites Cole Sketchbook no. 3, p. 143, Thomas Cole Papers, Detroit Institute of Arts, quoted in Glassie, Henry, “Thomas Cole and Niagara Falls,” New-York Historical Society Quarterly 8 (04 1974): 92.Google Scholar

48. Cole's poem “Niagara” is included in Thomas Cole's Poetry, ed. Tymn, Marshall B. (York, Pa.: Liberty Cap Books, 1972), pp. 50–51.Google Scholar

49. Cole, , “Essay on American Scenery,” in Coubrey, American Art, 1700–1960, p. 105.Google Scholar

50. McKinsey includes pictures of Horseshoe Falls from Goat Island on p. 213Google Scholar, courtesy of Glassie, Henry H., and Horseshoe Falls from the Canada Side (Collection Cranbrook Academy of Art Museum) on p. 206.Google Scholar

51. Lueck, Beth L.'s “Hawthorne's Ironic Traveler and the Picturesque Tour,” in Weber, Alfred, Lueck, , and Berthold, Dennis, Hawthorne's American Travel Sketches (Hanover, N.H., and London: University Press of London, 1989), pp. 153–80Google Scholar, contains many useful references to the picturesque tour and stresses the narrator's aesthetic growth and both his and Hawthorne's use of irony. In the same volume, Alfred Weber discusses Hawthorne's 1832 tour and provides a map of places of interest (pp. xvi, 1–23). The volume also includes a section on “The Northern Tour in Contemporary Paintings and Engravings” (pp. 73–98).

52. Wilmerding, , “The Luminist Movement,” American Light, p. 120.Google Scholar

53. McKinsey cites Huntington, David C., The Landscapes of Frederic Edwin Church: Vision of an American Era (New York: Braziller, 1966), pp. 65–66Google Scholar for the Ruskin quotation.

54. McKinsey, , Niagara Falls, p. 236Google Scholar. She cites the exhibition catalogue John Frederick Kensett, 1816–1872 (New York: American Federation of the Arts, 1968), n.p.Google Scholar

55. Ferber, Linda S., “Luminist Drawing,” American Light, p. 252Google Scholar. Ferber here cites Hunt, 's Talks on Art, First Series (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Company, 1896)Google Scholar, reprinted in Hunt, , On Painting and Drawing (New York: Dover, 1976), p. 64.Google Scholar

56. Powell, , “Luminism and the American Sublime,” American Light, p. 78Google Scholar. Here he cites Noble, Louis Legrand, The Life and Works of Thomas Cole, ed. Vesell, Elliot S. (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1964), p. 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The first edition was published in 1853.

57. Hawthorne, Julian, Hawthorne and His Circle (Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books, 1968), p. 153.Google Scholar

58. McKinsey, 's Niagara FallsGoogle Scholar includes photographs of Kensett's Niagara Falls at Amherst College on p. 236 and his Niagara Falls at the Denver Art Museum on p. 237.

59. McKinsey, , Niagara Falls, p. 247Google Scholar. See indicates (p. 317 n. 23) that the Church sketch is in the Cooper-Hewitt Museum and is reproduced in Adamson, Jeremy Elwell's Ph.D. dissertation, “Frederic Edwin Church's ‘Niagara’: The Sublime as Transcendence” (University of Michigan, 1981, illustration no. 303).Google Scholar