Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 July 2009
“I have Just come from the Gallery—my third visit,” announced a correspondent to the Boston Daily Advertiser on the second day of the Washington Allston retrospective at Harding's Gallery (Figures 1 and 2), “where I stood in the very midst… of the glowing colors and glorious subjects [of] the artist who stands alone in this his age, in this his art.” He was part of a chorus of dazzled spectators who crowded the exhibition, “filled with enthusiastic admiration” in “surveying forty-five pictures, many of which only the golden time of art could equal.” For the young Henry T. Tuckerman, who would recall it vividly in his influential Book of the Artists, the show “proved an epoch in the history of Art in the United States.” It was also the signal event of the artist's old age: a benefit exhibition that recalled the fifty-nine-year-old Allston from “a life of great seclusion” in suburban Cambridgeport, was extended from six to eleven weeks by popular demand, and fascinated some of the most critical minds in Boston.
Author's note: A version of this paper was presented as a Smithsonian Fellow's Lecture at the National Museum of American Art, Washington, D.C. I am grateful for the support of the Smithsonian Institution and want especially to thank Dr. Lillian B. Miller and Marc Pachter of the National Portrait Gallery, who criticized the paper through several drafts. Jack Salzman has been a patient and helpful editor. I would also like to acknowledge my debt to Lawrence Buell, David Robinson, and Andrew Delbanco. My greatest debt is to Barbara Novak.
For permission to quote from manuscript material, I am indebted to the Massachusetts Historical Society, the Longfellow National Historic Site, Cambridge, and the Harvard University Archives. I have received generous assistance from Kathy Catalano, Longfellow National Historic Site; Virginia Audet, Massachusetts Historical Society; Jonathan Harding, Boston Athenaeum; Carol Troyon, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston; Arthur Breton and the staff of the Archives of American Art; and the staffs of the American Antiquarian Society, the University of Virginia Manuscript Collection, and the Manuscript, Newspaper, and Rare Book Divisions of the Library of Congress.
1. “Allston Gallery,” Daily Advertiser, 04 26, 1839.Google Scholar
2. Evening Transcript, 05 2, 1839Google Scholar; Daily Advertiser, 04 31, 1839.Google Scholar
3. Tuckerman, Henry T., Book of the Artists (New York: G. P. Putnam, 1867), p. 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Ibid., p. 143. The exhibition and its important body of criticism are mentioned in the most recent study of the artist, Gerdts, William H., “The Paintings of Washington Allston,” in “A Man of Genius”: The Art of Washington Allston (1779–1843) (Boston: Museum of Fine Arts, 1979), p. 139Google Scholar; see also Richardson, Edgar P., Washington Allston. A Study of the Romantic Artist in America (New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Co., 1967), pp. 179–80Google Scholar: “Allston's retrospective exhibition of 1839 made an effect different from anything that had proceeded it.”
5. Holmes, to Dana, R. H. Sr., 01 6, 1840Google Scholar, ms. copy in “Friends” Notebook, Longfellow National Historic Site [LNHS]; Holmes, Oliver Wendell, “The Allston Exhibition,” North American Review, 50 (04 1840), pp. 358–81Google Scholar; Fuller, Margaret, “A Record of Impressions,” Dial, 1, 1 (07 1840), pp. 73–84Google Scholar; Emerson, Ralph Waldo, Channing, W. H., Clarke, James Freeman, eds., Memoirs of Margaret Fuller Ossoli (Boston, 1852), vol. 1, p. 47Google Scholar; The Letters of Margaret Fuller, Vol. 2, edited by Hudspeth, Robert N. (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1983), p. 75.Google Scholar
The other major reviews of the show were by Huntington, J., M.D., “The Allston Exhibition,” The Knickerbocker, 14 (08 1839), pp. 163–74Google Scholar (The author probably was Jedediah Huntington [1815–1862], brother of artist Daniel Huntington. He brought a letter of introduction from S.F.B. Morse.); two articles by “W. H. C.” (probably William Henry Channing) in the Western Messenger, 7, 2 (06 1839), pp. 200–9Google Scholar, which quoted a letter to the New York Literary Gazette; and 7, 4 (08 1839), pp. 327–32Google Scholar, which was largely a reprint of Elizabeth Peabody's 1836 article for the American New Monthly Magazine; and the most widely circulated (which I will discuss in detail below), Peabody, Elizabeth, Remarks on Allston's Paintings (Boston: W. Ticknor, 1839)Google Scholar, reprinted from six articles in the Evening Transcript. Scholars have often confused the authorship of the pamphlet, assigning it mistakenly to W. Ticknor.
6. Channing, W[alter], “Reminiscences of Washington Allston,” Daily Advertiser, 07 24, 1843.Google Scholar
7. The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Biographia Literaria, edited by James Engell and W. Jackson Bate (Princeton University Press, 1983), pt. 1, p. 304; pt. 2, pp. 16–17.
8. For a discussion of Coleridge's conception of the imagination and its relation to poetic form, see Biographia Literaria, Introduction by James Engell and W. Jackson Bate; Hodgson, John A., “Transcendental Tropes: Coleridge's Method of Allegory and Symbol,” Harvard English Studies 9. Allegory, Myth, and Symbol, edited by Bloomfield, Morton W. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981)Google Scholar; The best discussion of Allston's relationship with Coleridge is Hunter, Doreen, “America's First Romantics: Richard Henry Dana and Washington Allston,” New England Quarterly, 45 (1972), pp. 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Hunter overlooks, however, the significance of the mature Coleridge's religious beliefs for Allston.
9. Allston, Washington, Lectures on Art, and Poems (1850; rpt. Gainesville, Florida: Scholars' Facsimiles, 1967), p. 106Google Scholar; although Allston used the term “philosophical palette” to describe Gilbert Stuart's palette, it well describes the metaphysical significance that he perceived in color harmony. See Johns, Elizabeth, “Washington Allston. Method, Imagination, and Reality,” Winterthur Portfolio 12 (1977), pp. 14–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Haskell, Francis, Rediscoveries in Art (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
11. Delbanco, Andrew, William Ellery Channing. An Essay on the Liberal Spirit in America (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981), p. 66CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Allston's most supportive patrons were active Unitarians: Nathan Appleton and Samuel A. Eliot (who had attended Harvard Divinity School) owned pews in William Ellery Channing's Federal Street Church; Edmund Dwight was a member of King's Chapel; George Ticknor had converted to Unitarianism under the influence of J. S. Buckminster; Franklin Dexter's grandfather had left a bequest of $5,000 to Harvard for the encouragement of liberal Biblical studies. His Episcopalian patrons, David Sears, Mrs. M. Gibbs (Dr. Channing's mother-in-law) and Charles Codman, patronized him on his return from England but did not keep in close touch with him in the 1830s. For the Unitarian elite's control of the Boston Athenaeum, which was the city's single most important art institution, see Story, Ronald, “Class and Culture in Boston: The Athenaeum, 1807–1860,” American Quarterly, 27, 2 (05 1975), pp. 178–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Not until 1842 did Boston artists succeed in organizing an artist-run association, long after New York and Philadelphia.
12. “On the Fine Arts,” North American Review, 3 (07 1816), p. 196Google Scholar; “American Art and Art Unions,” Christian Examiner, 48 (03 1850), pp. 205–6Google Scholar; see also Flood, Verle Dennis, “A Study of the Aesthetics of Taste in America: The Role of Common Sense Philosophy in the Literary Criticism of the Boston Anthologists,” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Iowa State University, 1959Google Scholar, Chapter 2 and Howe, Daniel Walker, The Unitarian Conscience: Harvard Moral Philosophy, 1805–1861 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970), Chapter 7.Google Scholar
13. Channing, William Ellery, “Milton,” Christian Examiner (1826)Google Scholar; rpt. in The Works of William Ellery Channing, D. D. (Boston, 1848), I, 13.Google Scholar
14. Daily Advertiser, 04 26, 1839.Google Scholar
15. Richardson, , Washington Allston, p. 5.Google Scholar
16. Dexter, (1793–1857)Google Scholar is described as a connoisseur in “Our First Men,” or a Catalogue of the Richest Men of Massachusetts (Boston: Fetridge & Co., 1846).Google Scholar He assisted Allston with financial advice, helped hang his paintings in Athenaeum shows, copied several of Allston's oil sketches and wrote one of the first major analyses of Allston, 's art in North American Review 33 (10 1831), pp. 506–15.Google Scholar Dexter was a leading member of the Fine Arts Committee of the Boston Athenaeum, who spoke for most Boston patrons in the January 1828 North American Review, pp. 207–24Google Scholar where he criticized (and slightly distorted) the “democratic” ideas behind the founding of the National Academy of Design in New York.
17. In addition to the Bostonians, Dexter was assisted by the Philadelphia artist Thomas Sully, who arranged the loan of Dead Man Restored to Life from the Pennsylvania Academy for the Fine Arts and Donna Mencia in a Robbers Cavern from a private Philadelphia collection: Sully, , “Journals,”Google Scholar Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution [AAA]; the most detailed account of the installation is “The Allston Exhibition,” Daily Advertiser, 05 8, 1839.Google Scholar
18. Reviews appeared during the eleven-week run in most of the Boston newspapers, including the Boston Atlas, Daily Advertiser, and, the most influential, Evening Transcript. Dexter and Ticknor had written newspaper puffs for Allston in the past, and they were among those who arranged for the reviews that accompanied the retrospective. There were also a number of poems inspired by works in the show, including verses by James Freeman Clarke, Margaret Fuller, James Russell Lowell and Samuel Gray Ward. Among the lectures given about the show were those by Rev. Orville Dewey and J. Huntington to the Apollo Association in New York in the spring of 1840, and by Rev. Waterston, R. C. at Tremont Temple in 1840.Google Scholar
19. Tuckerman, , Book of the Artists, p. 146.Google Scholar
20. Daily Advertiser, 05 8, 1939.Google Scholar
21. Dana, R. H. to Bryant, William Cullen, 05 17, 1839Google Scholar, Dana Papers, Massachusetts Historical Society [MHSL]; within two weeks, attendance exceeded that at the Boston Athenaeum for the entire 1838 season.
22. Morning Post, 05 3, 1839Google Scholar; Dana to Bryant, April 1839, ms. copy in “Allston II” Notebook, LNHS, and May 17, 1839.
23. Evening Transcript, 05 2, 1839.Google Scholar
24. Trumbull's visit was noted by the Evening Transcript, 09 16, 1839.Google Scholar He had remained in Boston to paint portraits.
25. Evening Transcript, 04 27, 1839Google Scholar, and May 2, 1839; see also Morning Post, 05 8, 1839.Google Scholar
26. Ticknor, George to Dana, , 02 22, 1837Google Scholar, Dana Papers, MHSL.
27. The catalog is reprinted in Ware, William, Lectures on the Works and Genius of Washington Allston (Boston: Phillips, Sampson and Company, 1852), pp. 143–54Google Scholar; Daily Advertiser, 04 30, 1839Google Scholar regretted the omission of the paintings' dates.
28. Letters of Margaret Fuller, Vol. 2, p. 75.Google Scholar
29. Evening Transcript, 05 2, 1839.Google Scholar
30. Dana, to Bryant, , 05 13, 1839, Dana Papers, MHSL.Google Scholar
31. E.g., Daily Advertiser, 06 26, 1839Google Scholar; July 1, 1839; July 6, 1839.
32. For Herring's invitation, see Dana, to Bryant, , 05 17, 1839Google Scholar; June 12, 1839, Dana Papers, MHSL; S.F.B. Morse, to Allston, , 07 8, 1839Google Scholar, Morse Papers, Library of Congress.
33. Cheney, Ednah Dow, Gleanings in the Field of Art (Boston: Lee and Shepherd, 1881), p. 293.Google Scholar
34. For Belshazzar's Feast, see Gerdts, , “Paintings,” pp. 129–31Google Scholar; Dunlap, William, History of the Rise and Progress of the Arts of Design in the United States, Vol. 2 (New York: George P. Scott & Co., 1834), p. 188.Google Scholar For Allston's anxiety about his reputation, see Flagg, Jared B., The Life and Letters of Washington Allston (1892; rpt. New York: DaCapo Press, 1969), pp. 277–79Google Scholar; Dana, to MrsArnold, Sarah R., 05 15, 1839Google Scholar, Dana Papers, MHSL: “People do not now ask if Mr Allston works; and he has now convinced them of his industry and genius; & all seem greatly pleased.”
35. E.g., Evening Transcript. 06 11, 1839.Google Scholar
36. The Letters of Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Vol. 2, Edited by Killer, Andrew (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1966), pp. 134–36.Google Scholar
37. Alexander, to Powers, , 02 1839Google Scholar, Hiram Powers Papers, AAA.
38. Eliot, Samuel A., “Cash Book, 1825–33,”Google Scholar Harvard University Archives. He paid Allston in four installments over eleven months.
39. General information about Allston's finances is found in Gerdts, “Paintings.” The term “Boston notion” was coined by Jarves, James Jackson, “Art and Artists of America,” Christian Examiner 75 (07 1863), p. 116.Google Scholar
40. Allston, to Pickering, Henry, 03 18, 1820, Allston Papers, MHSL.Google Scholar
41. Allston, to Collins, William, 05 18, 1821Google Scholar, ms. copy, Allston Papers, MHSL.
42. New York Review (10 1838), pp. 475–76Google Scholar; see also Dana, H. W. L., “Allston in Cambridgeport 1830–1843,” Cambridge Historical Society, Publication 29. Proceedings for the Year 1943, pp. 13–67.Google Scholar Dana incorrectly located the studio some distance from Allston's 1830–41 residence. Robert H. Nylander as researcher for the Cambridge Historical Commission identified the house and studio as being on adjacent lots on the site of today's Central Square, within easy walking distance of Harvard. I am grateful to Charles Sullivan of the Cambridge Historical Commission for his assistance in clarifying this material.
43. For Allston's taxes, see Cambridge, Mass. Tax rolls and Assessor's Records, on microfilm, Cambridge Public Library. For Allston's financial problems in 1834, see Dana Papers, MHSL, and Morse Papers, Library of Congress.
44. Rezneck, Samuel, “The Social History of an American Depression,” The American Historical Review (07 1935), pp. 662–87Google Scholar, and Charvat, William, “American Romanticism and the Depression of 1837,” Science & Society, 2, 1 (Winter 1937), pp. 67–82.Google Scholar
45. Mason, to Cole, , 11 5, 1839Google Scholar, Thomas Cole Papers, AAA.
46. Allston, to Flagg, G. W., 10 29, 1840, AAA.Google Scholar
47. Sully, , “Journal,” 03 1839Google Scholar: “… it might be sold for $6000.”
48. Delbanco, , Channing, 156–57.Google Scholar
49. Quoted in Ibid., p. 58.
50. For the impact of industrialization and growth, see Rose, Anne C., Transcendentalism as a Social Movement, 1830–1850 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981), pp. 4–37.Google Scholar
51. The Athenaeum, 5 (1819), p. 137.Google Scholar
52. Frothingham, Nathaniel, The Duties of Hard Times (Boston: Munroe and Francis, 1837).Google Scholar
53. Quoted in Charvat, , “American Romanticism, p. 78.”Google Scholar
54. Rose, , Transcendentalism, p. 17.Google Scholar
55. It should be noted that Emerson remained a social and political conservative who regarded the Jacksonian era as an “emphatic and universal calamity.” For his dislike of the “commercial times” and ambivalence toward the antebellum economy, see Gilmore, Michael T., “Emerson and the Persistence of the Commodity,” Harvard English Studies 10. Emerson: Prospect and Retrospect, edited by Porte, Joel (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
56. “Uriel,” in The Complete Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Vol. 9 (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1903–1904), pp. 13–15.Google Scholar
57. Robinson, David, Apostle of Culture (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1982), p. 7Google Scholar; for the “revolution in American Unitarian historiography,” see Robinson, , “Unitarian Historiography and the American Renaissance,” ESQ, 23 (1977), pp. 130–37.Google Scholar The major sources for my discussion are: Howe, , Unitarian ConscienceGoogle Scholar; Buell, Lawrence, “Unitarian Aesthetics and Emerson's Poet-priest,” American Quarterly 20, 1 (Spring 1968), pp. 3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Literary Transcendentalism: Style and Vision in the American Renaissance (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1973)Google Scholar; Robinson, , Apostle of Culture and “The Legacy of Channing: Culture as a Religious Category in New England Thought,” Harvard Theological Review, 74, 2 (1981), pp. 221–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58. Robinson, , Apostle of Culture, p. 9.Google Scholar
59. Channing, William Ellery, “National Literature,” Christian Examiner, 36 (01 1830), p. 275.Google Scholar
60. Robinson, , Apostle of Culture, pp. 16, quoting Channing “Self-Culture.”Google Scholar
61. The expression is Delbanco, 's, Channing, p. 85.Google Scholar
62. Robinson, , Apostle of Culture, p. 16Google Scholar, quoting Channing, , “Self-Culture.”Google Scholar
63. Channing, , “Milton,” p. 22.Google Scholar
64. Studies of the “Milton” essay are Cole, Phyllis, “The Purity of Puritanism: Transcendentalist Readings of Milton,” Studies in Romanticism, 17 (1978), pp. 129–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar; VanAnglen, Kevin P., “‘That Sainted Spirit’-William Ellery Channing and the Unitarian Milton,” Studies in the American Renaissance, edited by Myerson, Joel (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1983), pp. 101–27Google Scholar; Buell, , “Unitarian Aesthetics,” pp. 12–15Google Scholar; Delbanco, , Channing, pp. 110–11, 172–77.Google Scholar
65. Channing, , “Milton,” pp. 8, 9.Google Scholar
66. Channing, , “National Literature,” pp. 282–83.Google Scholar
67. The concept of Bildung may be traced to Lord Shaftesbury and other eighteenth-century English critics read at Harvard who first bridged the idea of moral growth with the experience of the fine arts. See Abrams, M. H., “Kant and the Theology of Art,” Notre Dame English Journal, 13 (1981), pp. 79–81.Google Scholar
68. Robinson, , Apostle of Culture, p. 12.Google Scholar
69. Channing, , “Milton,” p. 8.Google Scholar
70. Buell, , “Unitarian Aesthetics,” p. 6 quoting Christian Examiner (1826)Google Scholar; Dahl, Curtis, “New England Unitarianism in Fictional Antiquity: The Romances of William Ware,” New England Quarterly, 48 (1975), pp. 104–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Eliot, Samuel A., Address before the Boston Academy of Music (Boston: Perkins, Marvin & Co., 1835).Google Scholar
71. “Prospects for Art in this Country,” Christian Examiner, 89 (01 1839), p. 311Google Scholar; see also Eliot, Samuel A., “Exhibition of Pictures,” North American Review (10 1830), pp. 309–11Google Scholar; and Memoirs of William Ellery Channing, vol. 3, edited by Channing, William Henry (Boston: William Crosby and H. P. Nichols, 1848), p. 26Google Scholar: In 1837, Channing suggested that art be available for contemplation in a “public gallery freely open.”
72. Channing's lecture was sponsored by the Franklin Society, an organization founded for the improvement of manual laborers. It was published as a pamphlet in Boston in 1838.
73. Evening Transcript, 05 2, 1839.Google Scholar
74. Daily Advertiser, 04 26, 1839.Google Scholar
75. Ibid.; Christian Examiner (01 1839), p. 313.Google Scholar
76. Daily Advertiser, 05 8, 1839.Google Scholar
77. Evening Transcript, 05 2, 1839.Google Scholar
78. Allston described the experience, which ended in his spontaneous recitation of a poem, “The Atonement,” to Peabody, Elizabeth, Last Evening With Alistan, and Other Papers (Boston: D. Lothrop and Company, 1886), pp. 6–9Google Scholar; The artist Charles Robert Leslie recorded Allston's anguished state following the death of his wife and the help he received from Coleridge, Leslie, C. R., Autobiographical Recollections, vol. 1, edited by Taylor, Tom (London: John Murray, 1860), p. 51Google Scholar; Allston's confirmation, reported by Leslie, is not quite clear. I have found no record of it in the archives of the Diocese of London. He had, however, been baptized as an Episcopalian in South Carolina.
79. “The Athenaeum Gallery,” North American Review (07 1829), p. 67.Google Scholar
80. Morpeth, Lord, ms. copy of Diary, 12 14, 1841Google Scholar, cited in Tyack, David B., George Ticknor and the Boston Brahmins (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967), p. 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
81. Daily Advertiser, 05 8, 1839.Google Scholar
82. Remarks on Allston's Paintings, Introduction, n.p.; Peabody's articles seem to have been regarded as the definitive criticism of the show. They were republished in late June as a pamphlet in an edition of 250: The Cost Books of Ticknor and Fields, edited, with an introduction, by Tryon, Warren S. & Charvat, William (New York: Bibliographical Society of America, 1949), p. 33.Google Scholar
83. The Journals and Miscellaneous Notebooks of Ralph Waldo Emerson, vol. 5, edited by Gilman, William B. and Parsons, J. E. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970), p. 195. [JMN]Google Scholar
84. JMN, vol. 7, edited by Plumstead, A. W. and Hayford, Harrison, pp. 199–200.Google Scholar
85. Ibid.
86. Lathrop, Rose Hawthorne, Memories of Hawthorne (1897; rpt. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1923), pp. 28–30.Google Scholar
87. Peabody, Elizabeth, Lectures in the Training Schools for Kindergartners (Boston: D. C. Heath & Co., 1886).Google Scholar
88. For Peabody's biography, see Wilson, John B., “A Transcendental Minority Report,” New England Quarterly 29, 2 (06 1956), pp. 147–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
89. Peabody, Elizabeth, “Allston the Painter,” American Monthly Magazine, n.s. 1 (05 1836), pp. 435–46.Google Scholar
90. Ibid., p. 444.
91. Tharp, Louise Hall, The Peabody Sisters of Salem (1950: rpt. New York: Book-of-the-Month Club, 1980), p. 106.Google Scholar
92. Remarks on Allston's Paintings, p. 11.Google Scholar
93. “A Record of Impressions,” p. 76.Google Scholar
94. Remarks on Allston's Paintings, p. 5.Google Scholar
95. Delbanco, , Channing, p. 49.Google Scholar
96. Remarks on Allston's Paintings, p. 24.Google Scholar
97. For the status of women in the New England religious tradition, see Reynolds, David S., “The Feminization Controversy: Sexual Stereotypes and the Paradoxes of Piety in Nineteenth-Century America,” New England Quarterly 53, 1 (03 1980), pp. 96–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Douglas, Ann, The Feminization of American Culture (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1977).Google Scholar
98. Christian Examiner (05 1833), p. 164.Google Scholar
99. Remarks on Allston's Paintings, p. 7.Google Scholar
100. Alighieri, Dante, The Divine Comedy, Translated and introduced by Mackenzie, Kenneth; with 111 engravings by Flaxman, John (London: The Folio Society, 1979)Google Scholar, from the 1807 edition. Allston owned this edition. For Allston's acquaintance with Flaxman and his preparatory sketches, see Leslie, , Autobiographical Recollections, vol. 1, pp. 71–72.Google Scholar
101. See, e.g., Leslie, , Autobiographical Recollections vol. 1, p. 33Google Scholar, reported a visit with Allston to Bridgewater House.
102. The Complete Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, vol. 4, edited by Coleridge, Henry Nelson (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1856), pp. 289–90.Google Scholar
103. Remarks on Allston's Paintings, pp. 14, 15.Google Scholar
104. The Token and Atlantic Souvenir (Boston, 1836), p. 107.Google Scholar An engraving of Allston's painting accompanied the article.
105. Sherb, E. V., “Dante's Beatrice as a Type of Womanhood,” Christian Examiner. 64 (05 1856), pp. 39–56.Google Scholar
106. Remarks on Allston's Paintings, p. 15.Google Scholar
107. Quoted by Dana, to Bryant, , 07 9, 1839Google Scholar, Dana Papers, MHSL; Western Messenger (06 1839), p. 204.Google Scholar
108. Remarks on Allston's Paintings, p. 5Google Scholar; Delbanco, , Channing, p. 38.Google Scholar