Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:44:33.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“In True Relations”: Love, Friendship, and Alternative Society in Emerson

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2009

Frank M. Meola
Get access

Extract

At one point in “The Soul of Man Under Socialism,” an essay that deals directly neither with the soul nor with socialism, Oscar Wilde quotes obliquely from Ralph Waldo Emerson:

[People] go through their lives in a sort of coarse comfort, like petted animals, without ever realising that they are probably thinking other people's thoughts, living by other people's standards, wearing practically what one may call other people's second-hand clothes, and never being themselves for a single moment. “He who would be free,” says a fine thinker, “must not conform.” And authority, by bribing people to conform, produces a very gross kind of over-fed barbarism among us. (267)

That Wilde was attracted to Emersonian nonconformity is not surprising, and the similarities between the two writers are striking. But my reason for citing Wilde, the ur-homosexual and model of iconoclasm, is that I want to show that Emerson is as innovative a thinker as Wilde, and that indeed on the subject of individualism and personal relationships he is far more so. In fact, Wilde can be seen as taking certain ideas of his teacher Walter Pater and giving them an Emersonian and American cast, expressing more openly Pater's cloistered Oxford radicalism. The “Socialism” essay in particular develops strong connections among aestheticism, individualism, and sociopolitical dissent, revealing a strong desire for alternatives to late-19th-century British society. And of course in the case of Pater as well as Wilde, the need for individualism and the quest for new forms of social connection have obvious links to both writers' alternative sexual orientation. What makes Emerson more radical, more, if you will, “queer,” is precisely that he is not arguing for any sexual orientation, but is attempting — many years before the Oxford aesthetes — to create a free space for alternative forms of gender and new forms of personal relationships to develop. Emerson values dis-orientation more than any orientation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Prospects , Volume 26 , October 2001 , pp. 35 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Auden, W. H. “The Protestant Mystics.” Forewords and Afterwords. New York: Vintage, 1974: 49–78.Google Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J.The Horrors of the Half-known Life: Male Attitudes Toward Women and Sexuality in Nineteenth-Century America. New York: Harper and Row, 1976.Google Scholar
Baym, Nina. “Melodramas of Beset Manhood: How Theories of American Fiction Exclude Women Authors.” American Quarterly 33 (1981): 123–39.Google Scholar
Bederman, Gail. “‘The Women Have Had Charge of the Church Work Long Enough’: The Men and Religion Forward Movement of 1911–1912 and the Mas-culinization of Middle-class Protestantism.” American Quarterly 41 (09 1989): 432–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, Alan. Homosexuality in Renaissance England. London: Gay Men's Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian. Domestic Individualism: Imagining Self in Nineteenth-Century America. The New Historicism, vol. 14. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. In Quest of the Ordinary: Lines of Skepticism and Romanticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. This New Yet Unapproachable America: Lectures after Emerson after Wittgenstein. Albuquerque: Living Batch, 1989.Google Scholar
Cayton, Mary Kupiec. Emerson's Emergence: Self and Society in the Transformation of New England, 1800–1845. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Chauncey, George Jr “From Sexual Inversion to Homosexuality: Medicine and the Changing Conceptualization of Female Deviance.” Salmagundi 58–59 (1982–1983): 114–46.Google Scholar
Cheyfitz, Eric. The Trans-Parent: Sexual Politics in the Language of Emerson. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J.Greek Homosexuality. New York: Vintage, 1980.Google Scholar
Douglas, Ann. The Feminization of American Culture. 1977. New York: Anchor/Doubleday, 1988.Google Scholar
Dowling, Linda. Hellenism and Homosexuality in Victorian Oxford. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Ellison, Julie. “The Gender of Transparency: Masculinity and the Conduct of Life.” American Literary History 4 (Winter 1992): 584–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, Julie. “Tears for Emerson: Essays, Second Series.” The Cambridge Companion to Ralph Waldo Emerson. Ed. Porte, Joel and Morris, Saundra. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999: 140–58.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. The Collected Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson. Vol. 2. Ed. Ferguson, Alfred R. and Carr, Jean Ferguson. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. The Letters of Ralph Waldo Emerson. Vol. 2. Ed. Rusk, Ralph L.. New York: Columbia University Press, 1939.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality, Volume I: An Introduction. New York: Vintage, 1980.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. Civilization and Its Discontents. Trans. Strachey, James. 1930. New York: Norton, 1961.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. Trans. Strachey, James. 1921. New York: Norton, 1959.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Michael. T.American Romanticism and the Marketplace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonnaud, Maurice. An Uneasy Solitude: Individualism and Society in the Work of Ralph Waldo Emerson. Trans. Rosenwald, Lawrence. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Halperin, David. M.One Hundred Years of Homosexuality, and Other Essays on Greek Love. New York: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
Halttunen, Karen. Confidence Men and Painted Women: A Study of Middle-Class Culture in America, 1830–1870. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Katz, Jonathan Ned. The Invention of Heterosexuality. New York: Plume/Penguin, 1995.Google Scholar
Leverenz, David. Manhood and the American Renaissance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Matthews, Genna. “Just a Housewife”: The Rise and Fall of Domesticity in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Newfield, Christopher. The Emerson Effect: Individualism and Submission in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Poirier, Richard. A World Elsewhere: The Place of Style in American Literature. 1966; rept. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Poirier, Richard. The Renewal of Literature: Emersonian Reflections. New York: Random House, 1987.Google Scholar
Richardson, Robert. D. JrEmerson: The Mind on Fire. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Rotundo, E. Anthony. American Manhood: Transformations in Masculinity from the Revolution to the Modern Era. New York: Basic, 1993.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Sennett, Richard. Authority. New York: Vintage, 1981.Google Scholar
Smith-Rosenberg, Carroll. Disorderly Conduct: Visions of Gender in Victorian America. New York: Knopf, 1985.Google Scholar
Thurin, Erik Ingvar. Emerson as Priest of Pan: A Study in the Metaphysics of Sex. Lawrence: Regents Press of Kansas, 1981.Google Scholar
Tompkins, Jane. Sensational Designs: The Cultural Work of American Fiction 1790–1860. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. Trans. George Lawrence. Ed. Mayer, J. P.. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor/Doubleday, 1969.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. 1899. New York: Mentor/NAL, 1953.Google Scholar
Weeks, Jeffrey. Sex, Politics, and Society: The Regulation of Sexuality Since 1800. London: Longman, 1981.Google Scholar
Wilde, Oscar. “The Soul of Man Under Socialism.” The Artist as Critic: Critical Writings of Oscar Wilde. Ed. Ellmann, Richard. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969: 255–89.Google Scholar