No CrossRef data available.
Professor Cornelius Felton of Harvard University, reviewing Emerson's Essays, First Series in 1841, predicted that self-reliance “if acted upon, would overturn society, and resolve the world into Chaos.” Since then a long line of Emerson critics have shared Felton's concern over Emerson's radicalism. The more temperate modern version of Felton's charge is that Emerson “brought to full consciousness … the antinomianism latent in the thought of his Puritan forbears.” According to these critics, Emerson is the spiritual descendant of Anne Hutchinson. Removed outside the constraints of seventeenth-century dogma and liberated by Romantic thought, he gives free play to the antinomianism she so cautiously denied. Antinomianism, in this view, lends unity to the disparate writers of the American Renaissance and continuity to the whole of early American literature.
1. Journals of Ralph Waldo Emerson, 1870–72, ed. Emerson, Edward Waldo and Forbes, Waldo Emerson (New York: Houghton-Mifflin, 1909), II, 516–17Google Scholar. Hereinafter cited as Journals.
2. Rusk, Ralph L., The Life of Ralph Waldo Emerson (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1949), p. 284.Google Scholar
3. Pearce, Roy Harvey, The Continuity of American Poetry (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1961), p. 189.Google Scholar
4. “The Transcendentalist,” in The Complete Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson, ed. Emerson, Edward Waldo (New York: Houghton-Mifflin, 1904), I, 336Google Scholar. Hereinafter cited as Works.
5. Anderson, Quentin, The Imperial Self: An Essay in American Literary and Cultural History (New York: Random House, 1971), p. 14.Google Scholar
6. “Nature,” in Works, I, 3.Google Scholar
7. “The Poet,” in Works, III, 17.Google Scholar
8. “The Transcendentalist,” in Works, I, 333.Google Scholar
9. “Nature,” in Works, I, 10.Google Scholar
10. “Divinity School Address,” in Works, I, 126–27.Google Scholar
11. “American Scholar,” in Works, I, 114.Google Scholar
12. Journals, II, 409.Google Scholar
13. Works, II, 153.Google Scholar
14. Ibid., p. 254.
15. Journals, IV, 449–50.Google Scholar
16. Works, II, 99.Google Scholar
17. Ibid., p. 116.
18. “Nature,” in ibid., I, 40–41.
19. Journals, IV, 128.Google Scholar
20. “Self-Reliance,” in Works, II. 49.Google Scholar
21. Works, II, 128–29.Google Scholar
22. Ibid., p. 132.
23. “Fate,” in ibid., VI, 19.
24. Journal, July 1852, in Whicher, Stephen, ed., Selections from Ralph Waldo Emerson (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1957), p. 329.Google Scholar
25. “Self-Reliance,” in Works, II, 74.Google Scholar
26. Oxford English Dictonary.
27. Works, II, 99.Google Scholar
28. “Divinity School Address,” in Works, 1, 123.Google Scholar
29. “Self-Reliance,” in ibid., II, 50.
30. Letter to Carlyle, , 12 31, 1844Google Scholar, in Whicher, , Selections, p. 274.Google Scholar
31. “Self-Reliance,” in Works, II, 50.Google Scholar
32. Ibid., p. 70.
33. Bercovitch, Sacvan, Puritan Origins of the American Self (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1975), p. 174.Google Scholar
34. Journals, II, 522.Google Scholar
35. Ibid., III, 382–83.
36. Journal, December 1849, in Whicher, , Selections, p. 320.Google Scholar
37. “Self-Reliance,” in Works, II, 45.Google Scholar
38. Journals, II, 310–311.Google Scholar
39. Ibid., III, 565.
40. Ibid., IV, 247.
41. Jehlen, Myra, “New World Epics: The Novel and the Middle-Class in America,” Salmagundi, 36 (Winter 1977), 55.Google Scholar
42. For a discussion of inequality and the myth of the classless society in the age of Jackson, see Pessen, Edward, Jacksonian America, Society, Personality, and Politics (Homewood, Ill,: Dorsey Press, 1969), pp. 39–58Google Scholar. For a discussion of Jacksonian economic doctrine in general, see Meyers, Marvin, The Jacksonian Persuasion (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1957), esp. Chaps. 5 and 6Google Scholar. For the social theory of the Jacksonians, see Blau, Joseph L., Social Theories of Jacksonian America (New York: Liberal Arts Press, 1947).Google Scholar
43. Works, II, 114–15.Google Scholar
44. Ibid., p. 111.
45. For this argument, see Bier, Jesse, “Weberism, Franklin, and the Transcendental Style,” New England Quarterly, 43 (06 1970), 179–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46. Journals, VII, 431.Google Scholar
47. Ibid., III, 388–90.
48. Ibid., VII, 286.
49. See Pessen, , Jacksonian America, pp. 39–58Google Scholar, on the lack of social mobility among all but the privileged.
50. “Fate,” in Works, VI, 11.Google Scholar
51. “Politics,” in Works, III, 212–13.Google Scholar
52. Journals, IV, 431.Google Scholar
53. Ibid., II, 310.
54. Ibid., III, 557.
55. “Nature,” in Works, I, 76–77.Google Scholar
56. For a discussion of American millenarianism in general, see Tuveson, Ernest Lee, Redeemer Nation: The Idea of America's Millennial Hole (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968)Google Scholar. For an examination of Emerson in this context, see Bercovitch, , Puritan Origins (note 33 above), Chap. 5.Google Scholar
57. Works, II, 253.Google Scholar
58. Ibid., II, pp. 118–19.
59. Federalist Papers (New York: New American Library, 1961), p. 83.Google Scholar
60. “Divinity School Address,” in Works, I, 122.Google Scholar
61. Journals, II, 318.Google Scholar