No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2010
page 371 note 1 Proceedings, xx. 197.
page 372 note 1 Ancient Stone Implements, 2nd ed., p. 622.
page 372 note 2 Journal of the Anthropological Institute, vol. xxii, Aug. and Nov., 1892, pp. 66–98.
page 373 note 1 Ancient Stone Implements, 2nd ed.; p. 290.
page 374 note 1 Ancient, Stone Implements, 2nd ed., p. 357. This is of the same type as a perfect one found near Eastbourne, figured by Sir John Evans.
page 376 note 1 Mr. Reginald Smith, in the discussion of the report, said he was of opinion that the urn was later, and probably belonged to the Hallstatt (earliest Iron) Period.
page 377 note 1 Proceedings, xviii. 294.
page 377 note 2 Sussex Arch. Collns., xi. 141.
page 379 note 1 Proceedings, xviii. 23.
page 379 note 2 Sussex Arch. Collns., xvi. 52.
page 380 note 1 Vol. liii, pp. 131–7.
page 381 note 1 Proceedings, xviii. 297.
page 383 note 1 Now Lord Cowdray.
page 384 note 1 L'Anthrnpologie, 1908, 559; 1901, 113.
page 385 note 1 Sehested, Arch. Undersög., pl. xiii, xv, xx; P. du Chatellier, La poterie… en Armorique, pl. 15, no. 3; pl. 16, fig. 7; Voss, Zeitschr. für Ethnologie, 1903, 188.