^{page 103 note 1} See on this point Baldwin Brown, The Arts in Early England, vol. iii, pp. 583, 695, 726.

^{page 104 note 1} Professor Baldwin Brown has wrestled with the problem but has got no definite results (The Arts in Early England, iv, 544). Compare two Ipswich specimens in Proceedings, xxi, 242, 247.

^{page 104 note 2} F. Moreau, Collection Caranda. (Aisne), ii, pl. 10 (N.S.), fig. 8; and Boulanger, Mobilier funéraire, pl. 26, fig. 25.

^{page 105 note 1} This form occurred at Sarre (Arch. Cant., vii, pl. xiii, grave lxiv), but the nature of the socket is not stated.

^{page 107 note 1} B. Brown, op. cit. iii, pl. xxxv, 10, and pl. xli, 2 (late fifth century). Their occurrence is discussed on p. 718.

^{page 107 note 2} Cf. Schetelig, Cruciform Brooches of Norway, figs. 45, 55, 72, 91, 92, etc.

^{page 109 note 1} Called in this neighbourhood the Nailbourne, as the stream is often lost below Bridge and rises again half-way between Bekesbourne and Littlebourne, much in the same way as the Mole sinks for a while in the chalk south of Leatherhead (W. Whitaker, Geology of the London Basin, 1872, p. 392, and Rice Holmes, Ancient Britain, 679).

^{page 113 note 1} Proc. Geol. Assoc., xxvi (1915), p. 6Google Scholar.

^{page 116 note 1} Very like a pair found complete, of the same diameter, at Newport Pagnell, Bucks., in 1899.

^{page 117 note 1} Cf. Baldwin Brown, op. cit., iii, 263, pl. xli, fig. 2 (Malton Farm, Cambs.), late fifth century.

^{page 120 note 1} Proceedings, xx, 344 ; cf. Opuscula archaeologica Oscari Montelio dicata 1913), p. 281.

^{page 121 note 1} The woodblock in Wilde's Catalogue, reproduced in the R. I. A. Christian Guide, has been reversed in the process.

^{page 121 note 2} Proc. Royal Irish Academy, iii (1845), 135.

^{page 121 note 3} Archaeologia, xvi, 348 (British Museum) ; cf. Proceedings, xx, 34.

^{page 121 note 4} Archaeological Journal, xxvii, 97 ; now in Taunton Castle museum.

^{page 123 note 1} Archaeologia, xlvi, pl. xxiv, figs. 16, 17.

^{page 123 note 2} They are included as such in Gen. Pitt-Rivers's volume. Primitive Locks and Keys (1883), pl. iv, figs. 40b, 41b; see p. 12.

^{page 125 note 1} This explanation is confirmed by the presence of a wire coil on a penannular brooch (R. I. A. Christian Guide, fig. 27, see p. 23) of about a. d. 550.

^{page 126 note 1} Ulster Journ. of Arch., ix (1903), 160Google Scholar.

^{page 127 note 1} Col. Wood-Martin noticed in some cases that the loops of the pin were worn smooth by friction with these coils.