Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T12:19:33.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XV.—Some New Facts about the Structure of the Cuticles in the Russian Paper-Coal and their Bearing on the Systematic Position of Some Fossil Lycopodiales. With a note on The Absence of Eligulate Heterosporous Lycopodiales in the Fossil-Record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Jessie A. R. Wilson  and
John Walton
John Walton
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Get access

Extract

The fossil cuticles of the paper-coal from the Moscow Basin in Central Russia were first described and figured by Auerbach and Trautschold in 1860. Since then these cuticles have been the subject of much discussion, especially with regard to the interpretation of their numerous regularly disposed perforations. According to the various views of previous investigators, several generic and specific names have been assigned to these cuticles. Auerbach and Trautschold, regarding the perforations as the result of the fall of the leaf-cushions as well as the leaves, considered the cuticles to belong to the genus Lepidodendron, and named the plant to which they belonged Lepidodendron tenerrimum.

Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 51 , 1932 , pp. 104 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Auerbach, J. and Trautschold, H., “Uber die Kohle von Zentral-Russland,” Nouv. Mem. Soc. Imp. d. Nat. d. Moskow, Bd. 13, 1860.Google Scholar
Bode, H., “Zur Kenntnis der Gattung Porodendron Nathorst (non Zalessky),” Palœontographica, Bd. 72, 1929.Google Scholar
Eichwald, E., Lethœa Rossica, Période ancienne, 1854.Google Scholar
Harvey-Gibson, R. J., “Contributions towards a Knowledge of the Genus Selaginella, Spr,” Ann. of Bot., vol. xi, 1897.Google Scholar
Nathorst, A. G., “Zur paläozoischen Flora der Arktischen Zone,” K. Sveska. Vetensk. Ak. Handl, Bd. 26, No. 4, 1894; “Zur fossilen Flora der Polarländer,” Nachträge z. Paläozoischen Flora Spitzbergens, 1914.Google Scholar
Seward, A. C., Fossil Plants, vol. ii, Cambridge, 1910.Google Scholar
Walton, J., “Note on the Structure of the Plant Cuticles in the Paper-Coal from Toula in Central Russia,” Mem. and Proc. Manchester Lit. and Phil. Soc., vol. lxx, 1926.Google Scholar
Zalessky, M. D., “Note sur les débris végétaux du terrain carbonifère de la chaine de Mugodzary,” Bull. Com. Géol., T. 28, 1909.Google Scholar
Zalessky, M. D., “Observations sur le Lepidodendron Olivieri Eichw. et le Lepidodendron tenerrimum A. et T,” Mem. du Comité Géol., Nouv. Sér., Livr. 125, 1915.Google Scholar
Zalessky, M. D. “Flore palæozoique de la série d'Angara,” Mem. du Comité Géol, Nouv. Ser., Livr. 174, 1918.Google Scholar
Zeiller, R., “Observations sur quelques cuticles fossiles,” Ann. d. Sci. Nat., Ser. VI, T. 13, 1882.Google Scholar