Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:09:19.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XVIII.—Abnormal Echinoids in the Collection of the Royal Scottish Museum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

James Ritchie
Affiliation:
Royal Scottish Museum
Get access

Extract

“Echini are a particularly good group in which to study questions of variation, because here variations can usually be expressed in very definite terms of numerical or other equally positive character.” On this account, and because, in spite of much description, the variants liable to occur in sea urchins have not yet been exhausted, the three specimens described below are recorded. Each of these exhibits a pronounced abnormality in the major symmetries. Two of them resemble another abnormal echinoid in the same collections, already discussed in Proc. Zool. Soc., in lacking part of a definite ambulacrum; but the means by which the tests have accommodated themselves to changed conditions of growth differ markedly in each of the three cases. The third specimen exhibits, in place of the normal five-radiate arrangement, almost perfect hexamery—a type of abnormality very different from that of the first two specimens. For in these the distortion is due to incomplete development caused, by interference with the processes of growth, while there the hexamery is a fundamental change in symmetry, is congenital in origin, and probably represents the type of variation known as duplication of parts.

Type
Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 241 note * Jackson, R. T., “Phylogeny of the Echini, with a Revision of Palæozoic Species,” in Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., vol. vii., 1912, p. 51.Google Scholar

page 241 note † Ritchie, and M'Intosh, , Proc. Zool. Soc., 1908, p. 646.Google Scholar

page 242 note * Proc. Zool. Soc., 1908, p. 646.

page 242 note † Archiv f. Naturg., iii. p. 241, pl.

page 242 note ‡ Proc. Zool. Soc., 1909, text-fig. 227.

page 242 note § Lambert, , “Note aur un cas de monstrosite de l'apex chez l'Echinocorys vulgaris,Bull. Soc. Yonne, 1890, xliv.Google Scholar

page 243 note * Jackson, R. T., “The Phylogeny of the Echini, with a Revision of the Palæozoic Species,” Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., vol. vii., 1912Google Scholar.

page 245 note * Hawkins, , Proc. Zool. Soc., 1909, part ii. p. 714Google Scholar, figs. 226–230.

page 245 note † Bell, , Jour. Linn. Soc., vol. xv., 1881, p. 126Google Scholar, pl. v.

page 245 note ‡ Philippi, see Bateson, , Materials for the Study of Variation, London, 1894, p. 443Google Scholar, fig. 137.