Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:44:18.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XIX.—Filial and Fraternal Correlations in Sex-linked Inheritance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Lancelot Hogben
Affiliation:
Department of Social Biology, University of London
Get access

Summary

The results obtained may be summarised in the following table comparing the filial and fraternal coefficients for autosomal and sex-linked variation. When dominance is complete the values given are referred to equal frequency of the allelomorphic genes, i.e.p = ½ = q.

Briefly, then, the contribution of sex-linked genes to the observed variance will tend to lower the correlation between father and son and between brother and sister. It will raise the correlation between father and daughter or between sister and sister conspicuously. These considerations emphasise the interest attaching to a separate investigation of fraternal correlation for sibs of all three sex classes in connection with studies on twins. If the correlation for dizygotic twins of like sex is higher than for dizygotic twins of unlike sex, the difference might be due to the greater similarity of environment for two individuals of the same sex, or it might be due to the contribution of sex-linked genes to the observed variance. In the latter case the correlation for boy pairs should be significantly lower than the correlation for girl pairs. The wide discrepancies in recorded data for fraternal correlations with respect to intelligence quotients might be re-examined from this standpoint. If an appreciable proportion of the total variance is due to sex-linked genes, it is of more importance that a boy should have a clever mother than a clever father.

Type
Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Brownlee, , 1910. “The Significance of the Correlation Coefficient when applied to Mendelian Distributions,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxx, p. 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Fisher, , 1918. “The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lii, p. 399.Google Scholar
(3)Pearson, , 1904. “Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution. Part XII,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc, A, vol. cciii, p. 53.Google Scholar
(4)Snow, , 1910. “On the Determination of the Chief Correlations between Collaterals in the Case of a simple Mendelian Population Mating at Random,” Proc. Roy. Soc, B, vol. lxxxiii, p. 37.Google Scholar