Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:31:49.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XIV.—The Fæcal Pellets of the Anomura

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Hilary B. Moore
Affiliation:
The Marine Biological Station, Port Erin, I.O.M.
Get access

Extract

As far back as 1678 Martin Lister, in his Historiæ Animalium Tractatus, has noted that, in the case of certain Molluscs, the fæces are of a regular form, and that their shape differs according to the species; he deduces from this that the intestine must show a corresponding difference in the various species.

Type
Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Galliher, E. W., 1929, “Collophane from Miocene Brown Shales of California,” Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists, vol. xv, No. 3.Google Scholar
(2)Moore, H. B., 1931, “The Muds of the Clyde Sea Area,—III. Chemical and Physical Conditions, Rate and Nature of Sedimentation, and Fauna,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., vol. xvii, No. 2.Google Scholar
(3)Moore, H. B., 1931, “The Specific Identification of Fæcal Pellets,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., vol. xvii, No. 2.Google Scholar
(4)Moore, H. B., 1931, “The Systematic Value of a Study of Molluscan Fæces,” Proc. Malac. Soc., vol. xix, Part VI.Google Scholar
(5)Takahashi, J., and Yagi, T., 1929, “Peculiar Mud-grains and their Relation to the Origin of Glauconite,” Econ. Geol., vol xxiv, pp. 838852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar