Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:17:10.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XIV.—Studies on Reproduction in the Albino Mouse. II. Contributions on the Maturation of the Sperm Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Hugo Merton
Get access

Extract

The morphological characters of mammalian sperm cells taken from the ductuli efferentes differ only slightly from the sperm derived from the vas deferens. However, it is known that spermatozoa from the caput epididymis, when kept in physiological salt solution, quickly become immotile, whereas those from the cauda epididymis retain their motility for a long time (Moore, 1928). During the slow passage through the epididymis the spermatozoa undergo a physiological process of maturation, which is said to occur under the influence of the epithelium of the epididymis and to result in a lesser susceptibility on the part of the spermatozoa to extraneous influences (Braus and Redenz, 1924; Redenz, 1926; and Lanz, 1929). Other authors maintain that this maturation of the spermatozoon is not conditioned by environmental influences (Young, 1931). In any case the spermatozoa achieve full functional ability only after they have reached the cauda epididymis and the vas deferens. These are the spermatozoa which enter the female genital tract at copulation, and thus it follows that spermatozoa for artificial insemination in the mouse must be taken from the vas deferens and cauda epididymis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 59 , 1940 , pp. 145 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Belonoschkin, B., 1934. “Der gegenwärtige Stand der Spermatozoen-forschung,” Arch. Gynäk., vol. clviii, pp. 181–214.Google Scholar
Bowen, R. H., 1922. “Studies on Insect Spermatogenesis. II. The Components of the Spermatid, etc., in Hemiptera,” Journ. Morphol., vol. xxxvii.Google Scholar
Braus, H., und Redenz, E., 1924. “Nebenhoden und Samenfäden,” Anat. Anz. Erg. H., vol. lviii, pp. 121–131.Google Scholar
Jaffé, R., und Berberich, F., 1932. “Hoden” in Handb. d. inneren Sekretion v. Max Hirsch, vol. i, p. 197.Google Scholar
Knaus, H., 1932. “Zur Physiologie der Spermatozoen,” Arch. Gynäk., vol. cli, pp. 302–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korchelt, E., und Heider, K., 1902. Lehrbuch der vergl. Entwicklungsgesch., vol. i, pp. 486–487.Google Scholar
Lagerlöf, N., 1934. Morphologische Unters. üb. Veränderungen i. Spermatozoenbild des Hodens beim Bullen mit verminderter und aufgehobener Fertilität, Upsala.Google Scholar
Lanz, Th. von, 1929. “Die reelle Acidität in den einzelnen Abschnitten des männl. Genitalapparates d. Ratte u. ihre hormonale Bedingtheit,” Arch. ges. Physiol., vol. ccxxii, pp. 181–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, A. M., 1933. “Comparison of Ciliary Activity under in vitro and in vivo Conditions,” Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., vol. xxx, pp. 501–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, H., 1926. “Die verschiedenartige Herkunft des Kinoplasmas der Samenzellen,” Biol. Zentrbl., vol. xlvi, pp. 656–678.Google Scholar
Merton, H., 1927. “Die Bewegungen der Samenzellen und ihr kinetisches Zentrum,” Zeits. Zellforsch. mikr. Anat., vol. v, pp. 629–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, H., 1930. “Die Wanderung der Geschlechtszellen in der Zwitterdrüse von Planorbis,” Zeits. Zellforsch. mikr. Anat., vol. x, pp. 527–531.Google Scholar
Merton, H., 1931. “Untersuchungen üb. d. Entstehung und Natur des Kinoplasmas i. den Zwitterdrüsen der Pulmonaten,” Zeits. Zellforsch. mikr. Anat., vol. xiii, pp. 202–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C. R., 1928. “On the Properties of the Gonads as Controllers of Somatic and Physical Characteristics. X. Spermatozoon Activity and the Testis Hormone,” Journ. Exp. Zool., vol. 1.Google Scholar
Moore, C. R., 1932. “Biology of the testis.” E. Allen: Sex and Internal Secretions, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Popa, Gr., Tta., 1931. “A Contribution to the Biology of Spermatozoa,” Proc. 2nd Int. Congr. Sex Research.Google Scholar
Redenz, E., 1925. “Versuch einer biologischen Morphologie des Nebenhodens,” Arch. Entwmech., vol. cvi, pp. 290–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redenz, E., 1926. “Nebenhoden und Spermienbewegung,” Würzburg. Abh. N.S., vol. iv, pp. 108–149.Google Scholar
Retzius, G., 1909. “Biologische Untersuchungen an Spermien,” Biolog. Unters., 13 u. 14 Folge.Google Scholar
Roemmele, O., 1927. “Biologische und physiologische Untersuchungen am Sperma und am Scheidensekret des Rindes im Hinblick auf die künstliche Besamung,” Zool. Jahrb. Abt. allgem. Zool. Physiol., vol. xliv, pp. 85–148.Google Scholar
Romeis, B., 1926. “Hoden, samenableitende Organe und akzessorische Geschlechtsdrüsen,“ Bethe, Handb. norm. path. Physiol., vol. xiv, p. 1.Google Scholar
Seliwanowa, O. A., 1934. “Die Stabilität der Spermien landwirtschaftlicher Tiere,” Biol. Journ., vol. iii, pp. 630–637 (Russian with German summary).Google Scholar
Stieve, H., 1930. “Der Hoden,” W. von Moellendorff. Handb. mikr. Anat., vol. vii, p. 1.Google Scholar
Walton, A., 1933. “The Technique of Artificial Insemination,” Imp. Bur. Animal Genetics, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Young, W. C., 1931. “A Study of the Function of the Epididymis. III. Functional Changes undergone by the Spermatozoa during their Passage through the Epididymis and vas deferens in the Guinea Pig,” Journ. Exp. Biol., vol. viii, pp. 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zawisch-Ossenitz, C., 1932. “Der Flimmerstrom in den ductuli efferentes des Hodens und die Bewegung der Spermien,” Zeits. mikr. anat. Forsch., vol. xxxii, pp. 84–106.Google Scholar