Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T22:02:46.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XIV.—Genetical and Cytological Studies of the Intergeneric Hybrid of Cairina moschata and Anas platyrhyncha platyrhyncha

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

F. A. E. Crew  and
P. C. Koller
F. A. E. Crew
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Edinburgh
P. C. Koller
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Edinburgh
Get access

Extract

It is recognised that infecundity and infertility are among the major problems which confront the breeder of livestock, and in this country, as elsewhere, investigation into their causes, prevention, and cure is actively encouraged. A number of pathological and nutritional factors have been shown to lie at the root of these conditions, and it has become abundantly clear that in many instances genetic factors are undoubtedly responsible for the inability on the part of the individual to elaborate functional gametes and/or of these gametes in their union to give rise to fully viable zygotes. These factors may be discovered in intergeneric crosses.

Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 56 , 1937 , pp. 210 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Beadle, G. W., 1931. “A Gene in Maize for Supernumerary Cell Divisions following Meiosis,” Cornell Univ. Agric. Expt. Sin. Mem., vol. cxxxv, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
Blakeslee, A. F., 1928. No title. Quoted in Carnegie Inst. Washington Year Book, vol. xxvii, p. 42.Google Scholar
Cavazza, F., 1931. “I Caratteri del descendante de ‘Ibridi’ di Specia normalmante infecondi par Incompleta Gametogenesi,” Arch. Zool. Ital., vol. xvi, pp. 371–383.Google Scholar
Chappellier, A., 1912. “La Segmentation parthénogénetique de l'Œuf des Hybrides: Canard domestique (Anas boschas) ♂ × Canard de Barbarie (Cairina moschata) ♀,” C.R. Soc. Biol., vol. lxxii, pp. 1010–1012.Google Scholar
Cornevin et Lesbre, , 1894. “Étude comparée des Canards de Barbarie, de Rouen sauvage et Mulard,” Ann. Soc. Agr. Lyon, vol. ii, pp. 365–396.Google Scholar
Crew, F. A. E., 1933. “A Case of Non-disjunction in the Fowl,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. liii, pp. 89–100.Google Scholar
Darlington, C. D., 1932. “The Control of the Chromosomes by the Genotype, and its Bearing on some Evolutionary Problems,” Amer. Nat., vol. lxvi, pp. 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darlington, C. D., 1936. “The Analysis of Chromosome Movements. I. Podophyllum versipelle,” Cytologia, vol. vii, pp. 242–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th., 1933. “On the Sterility of the Interracial Hybrids in Drosophila pseudo-obscura,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., vol. xxix, pp. 397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th., 1934. “Studies on Hybrid Sterility. I. Spermatogenesis in Pure and Hybrid Drosophila pseudo-obscura,” Zeits. Zellforsch., vol. xxi, pp. 169–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, R., 1934. “Lymantria,” Bibliograph. Genet., vol. xi, pp. 1–185.Google Scholar
Gordon, C. D., 1932. “Biochemical Relationship Studies with Pekin and Muscovy Ducks,” Poultry Sci., vol. xi, p. 371.Google Scholar
Gowen, M. S., and Gowen, J. W., 1922. “Complete Linkage in Drosophila melanogaster,” Amer. Nat., vol. lvi, pp. 268–288.Google Scholar
Guyer, M. F., 1900. “Spermatogenesis of Normal and Hybrid Pigeons,” Dissertation, Univ. Chicago.Google Scholar
Guyer, M. F., 1916. “Studies on the Chromsomes of the Common Fowl as seen in Testes and Embryos,” Biol. Bull., vol. xxxi, pp. 221–225.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S., 1922. “Sex Ratio and Unisexual Sterility in Hybrid Animals,” Journ. Genet., vol. xii, pp. 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harland, S. C., 1933. “Further Experiments on the Inheritance of Crinkled Dwarf Mutant of G. barbadense,” Journ. Genet., vol. xxviii, pp. 315–325.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. W. H., 1916. “Studies in the Hybrid Bistoninæ,” Journ. Genet., vol. vi, pp. 95–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinroth, O., 1906. “Beobachtungen an Entenmischlungen,” Sitz. Ges. Natcturf. Freunde, Berlin, 3–4.Google Scholar
Koller, P. C., 1934. “Spermatogenesis in Drosophila pseudo-obscura. II. The Cytological Basis of Sterility in Hybrid Males of Races A and B,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. liv., pp. 67–87.Google Scholar
Koller, P. C., 1936 a. “Structural Hybridity in Drosophila pseudo-obscura,” Journ. Genet., vol. xxxii, pp. 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koller, P. C., 1936 b. “The Origin and Behaviour of Chiasmata. XI. Dasyurus and Sarcophilus,” Cytologia, vol. vii, pp. 82–103.Google Scholar
Lancefield, D. E., 1929. “A Genetic Study of Crosses of two Races of Physiological Species in Drosophila pseudo-obscura,” Zeits. indukt. Abst. Vererb., vol. lii, pp. 287–317.Google Scholar
Metz, C. W., 1916. “The Paired Association of Chromosomes in the Diptera, and its significance,” Journ. Exp. Zool., vol. xxi, pp. 213–279.Google Scholar
Newton, W. C. F., and Pellew, C., 1929. “Primula Kewensis and its Derivatives,” Journ. Genet., vol. xx, pp. 405–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poll, H., 1907. “Über Vogelmischlinge,” Bericht uber V. Internal. Ornithol. Kongress, pp. 399–426.Google Scholar
Poll, H., 1910. “Keimzellbildungen bei Mischlingen,” Verh. Anat. Ges. II. Internat. Kongress Brussells, Anat. Anz., vol. xxxvii, pp. 32–57.Google Scholar
Punnett, R. C., 1932. “Note on a Sex-linked Down Character in Ducks,” Journ. Genet., vol. xxv, pp. 191–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgeway, W., 1905. Origin and Influence of the Thoroughbred Horse, Camb. Univ. Press., pp. 460–461.Google Scholar
Schinz, H. R., 1837. “Erste Klasse de Wirbelthiere,” N. Denkschr. Allg. Schweiz. Ges., vol. i, pp. 126–127.Google Scholar
Schöneberg, K., 1913. “Die Samenbildung bei den Enten,” Arch. mikr. Anat., vol. lxxxiii, pp. 324–369.Google Scholar
Seligmann, C. G., and Shattock, S. G., 1914. “Observations made to Ascertain whether any Relation Subsists between the Seasonal Assumption of the ‘Eclipse’ Plumage in the Mallard (Anas boschas) and the Functions of the Testicle,” Proc. Zool. Soc., pp. 28–43.Google Scholar
Selys-Longchamps, E. de, 1842, 1845. “Récapitulation des Hybrides observés dans la Famille des Anatidées,” Bull. Acad. Roy. Sci. Belles Lettres, Bruxelles, vol. xii, pp. 335–355.Google Scholar
Sokolovskaja, I. I., 1935. “Experiments on Hybridisation of Birds. I. Sexlinked Characters in Hybrids of Cairina moschata and Anas platyrhyncha,” Z. Zool., vol. xiii, pp. 481–496.Google Scholar
Suchetet, A., 1897. Des Hybrides a I'etat sauvage. Regne Animal. I. Classe des Oiseaux. Paris: J.-B. Baillière et Fils.Google Scholar
Werner, O. S., 1927. “The Chromosomes of the Indian Runner Duck,” Biol. Bull., vol. lii, pp. 330–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zawadowsky, M. M., 1931. “Zebu-Yak Hybrids,” Journ. Hered., vol. xxii, pp. 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar