Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:00:52.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

VII.—The Fertility of Scottish Married Women, with Special Reference to the Period 1926–1935

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

R. S. Barclay
Affiliation:
Laboratory of the Royal College of Physicians, Edinburgh
W. O. Kermack
Affiliation:
Laboratory of the Royal College of Physicians, Edinburgh
Get access

Extract

In a previous communication (Barclay and Kermack, 1938) it has been shown that the specific legitimate fertility rates of Sweden and Denmark, viewed broadly over several decades, exhibit well-marked regularities, briefly described as conformity to a “diagonal law.” The procedure is to express the specific fertility rate, observed for any particular age-group at a certain period, as a percentage of the rate for the same age-group at a time preceding the decline of the birth-rate (“standard rate”). If now these percentages are plotted as contours on a graph, in which the abscissæ represent calendar years and the ordinates women's age, it is found that, when the age-group 15–20 is excluded, the constant percentage curves are approximately straight lines, running parallel to the diagonals in such a sense that, along any line, increase in calendar years corresponds to decrease in women's age. In Finland, the same general effect is apparent, though it is somewhat obscured by minor disturbances. It is found that, in the case of England and Wales, predictions made on the basis of the law give a reasonable agreement with estimated fertility rates calculated by the Registrar-General on the basis of census data.

Type
Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Barclay, R. S., and Kermack, W. O., 1938. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lviii, pp. 5572.Google Scholar
Charles, E., 1938. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lix, pp. 371–83.Google Scholar
Charles, E., 1939. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lix, pp. 673686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eighty-Third Annual Report of the Registrar-General for Scotland, 1937, pp. li–liv.Google Scholar
Kuczynski, R. R., 1935. The Measurement of Population Growth.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. J., and Lewis, J. N., 1906. Natality and Fecundity, Table XIV, p. 29.Google Scholar
Newsholme, A., and Stevenson, T. H. C., 1905. Journ. Hyg., vol. v, pp. 175–84 and 304–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newsholme, A., and Stevenson, T. H. C., 1906. Journ. Roy. Stat. Soc., vol. lxix, pp. 3487.Google Scholar
Norges Offisielle Statistikk, Folkemengdens Bevegelse, 1921–1932, Table k, p. 24.Google Scholar
Wicksell, S. D., and Quensel, C.-E., 1938. Statens Off. Utr., 1938: 24 (Sweden).Google Scholar