Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 September 2014
The chemistry of this not the least interesting of deep-sea deposits, though it has received attention from several investigators in the past, still presents some uncertainties as regards both the analytical composition of the material and its chemical nature. It has therefore been suggested by Sir John Murray, to whom directly or indirectly all our knowledge of Red Clay is due, that the subject might with advantage be reopened from the chemical standpoint. The results of this revision, which was carried out in the Challenger Laboratory at Edinburgh, are set forth and discussed in the ensuing pages.
page 183 note * Thomson, Wyville, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., xxiii, p. 47, 1874.Google Scholar
page 183 note † Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin, ix. p. 247, 1877.
page 183 note ‡ In which the contemporary or shortly subsequent soundings of several other vessels are also made use of.
page 183 note § Murray, and Philippi, , Wiss. Erg. Deutsch. Tiefsee–Exp., x. p. 4, Jena, 1908.Google Scholar
page 183 note ║ Philippi, , Verh. XV Deutsch. Geographentages, Danzig, 1905, pp. 28–33 Google Scholar.
page 183 note ¶ Murray, and Lee, , Mem. Mus. comp. Zoöl., xxxviii., 1909.Google Scholar
page 184 note * Challenger Reports, “Deep-Sea Deposits,” 1891, pp. 190, 340.
page 184 note † For an account of the colloidal characteristics of clay see Rohland, , Abegg's Handb. d. anorg. Chem., iii. 1, pp. 90–102, 1906.Google Scholar
page 185 note * Challenger Reports, “Deep-Sea Deposits,” pp. 425–433.
page 185 note † Quart. Jour. Geol. Soc., li. p. 315, 1895.
page 185 note ‡ Challenger Reports, “Deep-Sea Deposits,” pp. 434, 435.
page 185 note § Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., xxvii, p. 170, 1907.
page 185 note ‖ Challenger Reports, “Deep-Sea Deposits,” p. 424.
page 187 note * Pogg. Ann., xxxv. p. 331, 1835.
page 187 note † For a full account see Berdel, Sprechsaal, 1902, pp. 881, 919, 959.
page 192 note * The volcanic glass from Challenger Station 302 (analysis, Challenger Reports, “Deep-Sea Deposits,” p. 307) was tested and found to contain not a trace of barium.
page 192 note † Radioactivity and Geology, London, 1909, p. 50.
page 195 note * Zeitschr. Anorg. Chem., xlii. 265–324, 1904.
page 195 note † Caspari, , Mem. Mus. comp. Zoöl., xxxviii, p. 169, 1909 Google Scholar.
page 195 note ‡ Wittstein, Vierteljahrsschr. f. pharm., i. p. 275; Spring, Neues Jahrb., 1899, p. 47.
page 195 note § Loc. cit.
page 196 note * Zeitschr. deutsch. geol. Ges., xxviii, p. 519, 1896.
page 196 note † Centralbl. f. Min., 1908, pp. 622, 661.
page 196 note ‡ Loc. cit.
page 197 note * Bütschli, , Untersuchungen über Strukturen, Leipzig, 1898 Google Scholar; Hardy, , Journ. of Physiol., xxiv. p. 158, 1899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 197 note † Zeitschr. deutsch. geol. Ges., xxxix, p. 594, 1887; xl. p. 637, 1888.
page 197 note ‡ Amer. Journ. Sci., vi. p. 270, 1898; Phil. Mag., xlvii, p. 461, 1899.
page 198 note * Silica cannot, however, accumulate in solution, but is returned to the bottom by biological agencies as diatom or radiolarian ooze.
page 200 note * Challenger Reports, “Deep-Sea Deposits,” p. 307.
page 200 note † Cf. Vesterberg, and Mauzelius, , Bull. Geol. Inst. Upsala, v., No. 9, p. 125, 1900.Google Scholar
page 200 note ‡ Challenger Reports, “Deep-Sea Deposits,” passim.