Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:58:29.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Photo-Chemical Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Get access

Extract

A chief difficulty in the study of photo-chemical action lies in its variety, for it gives rise not merely to changes of a chemically simple kind, but also to the innumerable complex changes of plant-life and photography.

The difficulty is further increased by the extremely small proportion of material substance, chemically altered in a limited time by the action of those vibrations of the ether which we call light. To this, perhaps, more than to any other cause, must be attributed our continued inability to ascertain the true nature of photo-chemical changes so constantly observed as the decomposition of silver haloids by light.

Repeated attempts have been, made to connect particular chemical effects, such as oxidation and reduction, with greater or smaller wave-length; but all such attempts have ended in self-contradiction (1, 2).

Now, if there be any single characteristic associating all photochemical actions together, this characteristic must be present in the simplest as well as in the most complex cases, and the consideration of the former seems, therefore, most likely to lead to definite conclusions.

Perhaps the most striking and the most simple case that presents itself is the increased electric conductivity imparted to crystalline selenium on exposure to light.

Monkmann has shown that pure soluble sulphur also acquires increased conductivity when exposed to light, though to a less degree than selenium (3).

Ultra-violet light (4), and also the Röntgen rays, impart electric conductivity to the air.

In these eases the change is a temporary one.

Type
Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1897

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Chastaing, , Ann. Chim. Phys. [5], 11, p. 145.Google Scholar
2Vogel, , Ber., 10, p. 1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Proc. Roy. Soc., 1889, vol. xlvi, p. 136.Google Scholar
4Arrhenius, , Wien. Ak. Ber., 33, p. 638 (1888).Google Scholar
5Heuman, , Chem. Centralbl. (1874), p. 418.Google Scholar
6Böttger, , Chem. Centralbl. (1875), p. 291.Google Scholar
7Arrhenius, , Wien. Ak. Ber., 96, p. 831 (1887).Google Scholar
8Chevreul, , Compt. Rend. (1858), p. 1007.Google Scholar
9Chastaing, , loc. cit.Google Scholar
10Krüss, , Eder's Jahrb. f. Photographie, Bd. i. p. 174.Google Scholar
11Schönbein, , Erdmann Jour., 51, p. 273 (1850).Google Scholar
12Chastaing, , loc. cit.Google Scholar
13Chastaing, , loc. cit.Google Scholar
14Moren, , Compt. Rend. (1865), p. 321.Google Scholar
15Lemoine, , Ann. Chim. Phys. [5], 12, 145.Google Scholar
16Vogel, , Pogg. Ann., 119, p. 497.Google Scholar
17Kohlrausch, and Grotian, , Pogg. Ann., 154 (1875).Google Scholar
18Bouty, , Compt. Rend., 106, 654 (1888).Google Scholar
19Eder, , Wien. Ak. Ber., 80 N.B. [2], p. 636 (1880).Google Scholar
20Klimenko, and Pekatores, , Ber. d. Chem. Gesst. (1889). R. p. 219.Google Scholar