Article contents
A New Specifying Method for Stress and Strain in an Elastic Solid
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 September 2014
Extract
The method for specifying stress and strain hitherto followed by all writers on elasticity has the great disadvantage that it essentially requires the strain to be infinitely small. As a notational method it has the inconvenience that the specifying elements are of two essentially different kinds (in the notation of Thomson and Tait e, f, g, simple elongations; a, b, c, shearings). Both these faults are avoided if we take the six lengths of the six edges of a tetrahedron of the solid, or, what amounts to the same, though less simple, the three pairs of face-diagonals of a hexahedron, as the specifying elements. This I have thought of for the last thirty years, but not till a few weeks ago have I seen how to make it conveniently practicable, especially for application to the generalised dynamics of a crystal.
- Type
- Proceedings
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1904
References
page 97 note * This name, signifying a figure bounded by three pairs of parallel planes, is admitted in crystallography; but the longer and less expressive ‘parallelepiped’ is too frequently used instead of it by mathematical writers and teachers. A hexahedron, with its angles acute and obtuse, is what is commonly called, both in pure mathematics and crystallography, a rhombohedron. A right angled hexahedron is a brick, for which no Greek or other learned name is hitherto to the front in usage. A rectangular equilateral hexahedron is a cube.
page 97 note † For brevity I shall henceforth call the centre of gravity of a triangle, or of a tetrahedron, simply its centre.
page 99 note * Thomson and Tait's Natural Philosophy, § 155; Elements, § 136.
page 99 note † Thus we have an interesting theorem in the geometry of the tetrahedron:—If an ellipsoid touching the edges of a tetrahedron has its centre at the centre of the tetrahedron, the points of contact are at the middles of the edges.
page 99 note ‡ Thomson and Tait's Natural Philosophy, § 160; Elements, § 141.
- 1
- Cited by