Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:28:34.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Design and Interpretation of Experiments based on a Four-fold Table : the Statistical Assessment of the Effect of Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

W. O. Kermack
Affiliation:
Laboratory of the Royal College of Physicians, Edinburgh
A. G. McKendrick
Affiliation:
Laboratory of the Royal College of Physicians, Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

1. Formulæ are given in a convenient form for calculating the numbers of animals likely to be required in a controlled experiment for testing the effect of a treatment, when a rough knowledge of the possible maximum efficiency of the treatment is available, and the level of mortality amongst the controls is approximately known. For most purposes formula (8) is sufficiently accurate.

2. A formula (11) is deduced for calculating the limits between which the real advantage of the treated over the control is likely to lie.

3. The method has been extended to the case where various treatments are compared amongst themselves. A formula (15) is deduced for the calculation of the limits within which the real superiority (or inferiority) of any one treatment over the aggregate of all the treatments is likely to lie.

Type
Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Udny Yule, G. and Kendall, M. G., 1937. An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics, IIth ed., Charles Griffin & Co., London.Google Scholar
M'kendrick, A. G., 19321940. Nine “Analytical Reviews of Reports from Pasteur Institutes on the Results of Anti-Rabies Treatment.” Quart. Bull. Health Organisation League of Nations, 1932, vol. i, pp. 110 and 725; 1933, vol. ii, p. 553; 1934, vol. iii, p. 613; 1935, vol. iv, p. 752; 1937, vol. vi. p. 17; 1938, vol. vii, p. 1; 1940, vol. ix, p. 31.Google Scholar