Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:19:10.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VI.—On Singular Pencils of Zehfuss, Compound, and Schläflian Matrices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

W. Ledermann
Get access

Extract

In this paper the canonical form of matrix pencils will be discussed which are based on a pair of direct product matrices (Zehfuss matrices), compound matrices, or Schläflian matrices derived from given pencils whose canonical forms are known.

When all pencils concerned are non-singular (i.e. when their determinants do not vanish identically), the problem is equivalent to finding the elementary divisors of the pencil. This has been solved by Aitken (1935), Littlewood (1935), and Roth (1934). In the singular case, however, the so-called minimal indices or Kronecker Invariants have to be determined in addition to the elementary divisors (Turnbull and Aitken, 1932, chap. ix). The solution of this problem is the subject of the following investigation.

Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 56 , 1937 , pp. 50 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Aitken, A. C., 1935. “The Normal Form of Compound and Induced Matrices,” Proc. London Math. Soc., vol. xxxviii, ser. 2, pp. 354–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledermann, W., 1935. “Reduction of Singular Pencils of Matrices,” Proc.Edin. Math. Soc., vol. iv, ser. 2, pp. 92–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, D. E., 1935. “On Compound And Induced Matrices,” Proc.London Math. Soc., vol. xl, ser. 2, pp. 370–381.Google Scholar
Roth, W. E., 1934. “On Direct Product Matrices,” Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., vol. xl, pp. 461–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, D. E., 1933. “On The Rational Solution of The Matrix Equation SX = XT,” Proc. Akad. van Wetensch. Amsterdam, vol. xxxvi, No. 4, p. 5.Google Scholar
Turnbull, H. W., 1935. “On The Reduction of Singular Pencils of Matrices,” Proc. Edin. Math. Soc., vol. iv, ser. 2, pp. 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, H. W., and Aitken, A. C., 1932. An Introduction to the Theory of Matrices (Glasgow).Google Scholar
Williamson, J., 1931. “The Latent Roots of a Matrix of Special Type,” Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., vol. xxxvii, pp. 586 ff.Google Scholar