Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:02:39.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VII.—The Development of the Germ Cells in the Mammalian Ovary, with special reference to the Early Phases of Maturation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

A. Louise McIlroy
A. Louise McIlroy*
Affiliation:
Physiological Laboratory, University of Glasgow
Get access

Extract

Although much literature has been published on the minute anatomy of the ovary, there are many controversial points remaining, and therefore the publication of the results of the examination of various mammalian types adds additional proof to the facts already staged by embryologists. Three years ago this work was taken up by me as a preliminary to an investigation into the distribution of the chromatic substance in cells which show malignant degenerative changes. The work has occupied so much time that the publication of the results has been necessarily delayed. In a paper on “Primary Cancer of the Ovary,” published in 1906, I stated, as the result of a somewhat limited observation on the later stages of the development of the human ovary, that the cells of the stratum granulosum were mesoblastic in origin. This view I have modified by the more thorough and extensive investigation of the present paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 31 , 1912 , pp. 151 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE

(1) Balfour, F. M., Quart. Journ. of Microscop. Soc., vol. xviii., 1878: “On the Structure and Development of the Vertebrate Ovary.”Google Scholar
(2) Berghs, Jules, La Cellule, t. xxii., 1905: “La formation des chromosomes hétérotypiques dans la sporogénèse végétale.”Google Scholar
(3) Bolles Lee, A., La Cellule, t. xiii., “Les cinèses spermatogénétiques chez l'Helix pomatia.”Google Scholar
(4) Bryce, T. H., Quain's Elements of Anatomy, vol. of Embryology, 1908. Quart. Journ. of Micros. Soc., vol. xxiv., 1903: “Maturation of the Ovum in Echinus esculentus.”Google Scholar
(5) Bühler, A, Ziet. ƒ. wiss. Zool., Bd. lviii., 1894: “Beiträge zur kenntniss der Eibildung beim kaninshen und der Markstränge des Eierstockes beim Fuchs und Menschen.”Google Scholar
(6) Clark, , Johns Hopkins Hosp. Rep., vii., 1898: “The Origin, Growth, and Fate of the Corpus luteum.”Google Scholar
(7) Cœrt, H. F., Proefschrift, Leiden, 1898, quoted by v. Winiwarter and Bryce.Google Scholar
(8) Farmer, F. B., and Moore, F. E. S., Quart. Journ. of Micros. Soc., vol. xlviii., 1905: “On the Maiotic Phase (Reduction Divisions) in Animals and Plants.”Google Scholar
(9) Foulis, , Quart. Journ. Micros. Soc., vol. xvi., 1876: “On the Development of the Ova and Structure of the Ovary in Man and other Mammalia.”Google Scholar
(10) Grégoire, , La Cellule, t. xxii., 1905: “Les résultats acquis sur les cinèses de maturation dans les deux règnes.”Google Scholar
(11) Griffiths, and Williamson, , System of Gynæcology, 1906: chapter on “The Ovary.”Google Scholar
(12) Kölliker, A. V., Entwicklungsgeschichte, II., Aufl. 1879, Leipzig.Google Scholar
(13) Lane–Claypon, F., Proc. Roy. Soc, 1905: “On the Origin and Life History of the Interstitial Cells of the Ovary of the Rabbit.”Google Scholar
(14) Lerat, P., La Cellule, t. xxii., 1905: “Les phénomènes de maturation dans l'ovogénèse et la spermatogénèse.”Google Scholar
(15) Mark, E. L., Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoöl. Har. Coll., vi., 1881, quoted by Wilson.Google Scholar
(16) McIlroy, A. L., Journ. of Obst. and Gyn. of Brit. Emp., 1906 “Primary Carcinoma of the Ovary.”Google Scholar
(17) Moore, F. E. S., and Robinson, L. E., Quart. Journ. Micros. Soc., vol. xlviii., 1905: “On the Behaviour of the Nucleolus in the Spermatogenesis of Periplaneta Americana.”Google Scholar
(18) Nagel, W., Arch. ƒ. Mikr. Anat., Bd. xxxi., 1888: “Das menschliche Ei.”Google Scholar
(19) Pflüger, W., Ueber die Eierstöcke der Säuger u. des Menschen, Leipzig, 1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20) Reid, T., Giornale della Reale Accad. di Med. di Torino, 1904: “Riserche microscopiche fatte dal professore Thomas Reid di Glasgow della presenza fra gl” epiteli di elementi cellulori connettivali.”Google Scholar
(21) Stevens, G., Trans. Obst. Soc. Lond., vol. xlv.: “The Fate of the Ovum and Graafian Follicle in Præ-menstrual Life.”Google Scholar
(22) Valentin, , Handbuch der Entwickelungsgeschichte der Menschen, Berlin, 1835.Google Scholar
(23) Van Beneden, Ed, Arch. de Biol., t. i., 1880 “Contribution à la connaissance de l'ovaire des mammifères.”Google Scholar
(24) Van Der Stricht, O., Bull. de l'Acad. Roy. de Féd. de Belgique, xix., 1905: “La structure de l'œuf des mammifères; seconde partie: structure de l'œuf ovarique de la femme.”Google Scholar
(25) Velits, Von, Zeit. ƒ. Geb. u. Gyn., xvii., 1889: “Beiträge zur Histologie u. Genese der Flimmerpapillärkystomen der Eierstocks.”Google Scholar
(26) Von Winiwarter, H., Arch, de Biol., 1900: “Recherches sur l'ovogénèse et l'organogénèse de l'ovaire des mammifères (lapin et homme).”Google Scholar
(27) Von Winiwarter, H., et Sainmont, G., Arch. ƒ. Biol, t. xxiv., Août 1908, Avril et Septembre 1909.Google Scholar
(28) Waldeyer, W., Eierstock u. Ei, Leipzig, 1870.Google Scholar
(29) Weigert, K., Zeit. ƒ. Mikros., Bd. xxi., 1904: “Eine kleine Verbesserung der Hämatoxylin—Van Gieson Methode.”Google Scholar
(30) Whitridge Williams, F., Johns Hopkins Hosp. Rep., iii., 1892: “Papillomatous Tumours of the Ovary”Google Scholar
(31) Wendeler, , Martin's Krankheit der Eierstöcke, etc., 1899.Google Scholar
(32) Wilson, E. B., The Cell in Development and Inheritance, 1906.Google Scholar