Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:44:54.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neobythites Brucei, Poisson abyssal nouveau reoueilli par l'Expédition Antarctique Nationals Ecossaise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Louis Dollo  and
M. R. H. Traquair
Louis Dollo
Affiliation:
Conservateur au Musée royal d'Histoire naturelle, à Bruxelles.
Get access

Extract

Le deuxiéme Poisson abyssal de la Scotia dont je désire entretenir la Société Royale d'Edimbourg appartient au genre Neobythites, qui fut découvert, en réalité, par le Challenger, en 1875, près du Japon, par 1875 fathoms, bien que le nom n'ait été crée qu'en 1886, sur des matériaux de l'Albatross, comme nous le verrons plus loin.

Et ce deuxième Poisson est encore une espèce nouvelle, à laquelle je donnerai le nom de Neobythites Brucei, en l'honneur de M. W. S. Bruce, Leader de l'Expédition Antarctique Rationale Ecossaise, comme un témoignage de reconnaissance pour les services rendus à la Science au cours de soil importante Exploration.

Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , 1906 , pp. 172 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1906

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 172 note * Günther, A., “Report on the Deep-Sea Fishes,” Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76, Zoology, vol. xxii., 1887, p. 100.Google Scholar

page 172 note † Townsend, O. H., “Dredging and other Records of the United States Fish Commission Steamer Albatross, with Bibliography relative to the work of the vessel,” U. S. Comm. Fish and Fisheries: Commissioner's Report, 1900, Washington, 1901, p. 504.Google Scholar

page 173 note * Richardson, J., “Fishes,” Zoology of H.M.S. Erebus and Terror, under the command of Captain Sir James Clark Ross, R.N., F.R.S., during the years 1839 to 1843, Londres, 1844–1848, p. 35.Google Scholar

page 173 note † Dollo, L., “Poissons de l'Expédition Antarctique Beige,” Msultats du Voyage du 8. Y. Belgica en 1897, 1898, 1899, sous le commandement de A. de Gerlache de Gomery, Anvers, 1904, p. 11.Google Scholar

page 173 note ‡ Boulenger, G. A., “Pisces,” Report on the Collections of Natural History made in the Antarctic Regimis during the Voyage of the Southern Cross, Londres, 1902, p. 174.Google Scholar

page 173 note § Scott, R. F., The Voyage of the Discovery, Londres, 1905, vol. i., p. 120.Google Scholar “… It is disappointing to learn that we cannot expect any additions to the deep-sea fauna of the Southern Ocean. The wealth of new material collected by the Challenger in its one deep haul in the Antarctic, led to hope that valuable results would be achieved by the powerful deep-sea equipment of the Discovery; but apparently it was very little used, owing to the short time spent at sea, and possibly on account of the limited coal supply. One dredging is referred to at the depth of 610 fathoms, another at 100 fathoms, and a third, also in shallow water, off the great ice-barrier.”—Gregory, J. W., “The Work of the National Antarctic Expedition,” Nature, 1906, vol. lxxiii., p. 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 173 note ║ “The fishes, taken in considerable numbers down to depths of 200 feet, represent some fifteen species.”—Charcot, J., “The French Antarctic Expedition,” Geographical Journal, 1905, vol. xxvi., p. 514.Google Scholar

page 173 note ¶ von Drygalski, E., Zum Kontinent des eisigen Südens, Berlin, 1904 (carte).Google Scholar

page 173 note ** Nordenskjöld, O., Andersson, J. G., Larsen, C. A., Skottsberg, C., Antarctic, två år bland sydpolens isar, Stockholm, 1904 (cartes).Google Scholar

page 173 note †† Dollo, L., “Sur la Phylogénie des Dipneustes,” Bull. Soc. belg. Géol., 1895, vol. ix., p. 90.Google Scholar

page 174 note * Günther, A., “Preliminary Notes on New Fishes collected in Japan during the Expedition of H.M.S. Challenger,” Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 1877, vol. xx., p. 437.Google Scholar

page 174 note † Günther, A., Deep-Sea Fishes, etc., p. 100.Google Scholar

page 174 note ‡ Goode, G. B. and Bean, T. H., “Descriptions of New Fishes obtained by the United States Fish Commission mainly from deep water off the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts,” Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., 1885 (1886), vol. viii., p. 600.Google Scholar

page 174 note § Günther, A., Deep-Sea Fishes, etc., p. 100.Google Scholar

page 174 note ¶ Goode, G. B. and Bean, T. H., “Oceanic Ichthyology,” Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, Washington, 1895, vol. xxx., p. 325.Google Scholar

page 175 note * Alcock, A., A Descriptive Catalogue of the Indian Beep-Sea Fishes in the Indian Museum: being a revised Account of the Deep-Sea Fishes collected by the Royal Indian Marine Survey Ship Investigator, Calcutta, 1899, p. 79.Google Scholar

page 175 note † Garman, S., “The Fishes (Reports on an Exploration off the West Coasts of Mexico, Central and South America, and off the Galapagos Islands, in charge of Alexander Agassiz, by the U.S. Fish Commission Steamer Albatross, during 1891, Lieut-Commander Z. L. Tanner, U.S.N., commanding),” Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool, Harvard Coll., 1899, vol. xxiv., p. 162.Google Scholar

page 176 note * Günther, A., Deep-Sea Fishes, etc., p. 100Google Scholar; Alcock, A., Investigator, etc., pp. 82 et 83Google Scholar; Garman, S., Albatross, etc., p. 391.Google Scholar

page 176 note † Alcock, A., Investigator, etc., p. 83Google Scholar; Garraan, S., Albatross, etc., p. 391.Google Scholar

page 177 note * Alcock, A., Investigator, etc., p. 78.Google Scholar

page 178 note * Goode, G. B. and Bean, T. H., Oceanic Ichthyology, etc., p. 315.Google Scholar

page 178 note † Günther, A., Deep-Sea Fishes, etc., p. 100.Google Scholar

page 178 note ‡ Boulenger, G. A., “Teleostei (Systematic Part),” Cambridge Natural History (Fishes, etc.), Londres, 1904, vol. vii., p. 712.Google Scholar

page 178 note § Günther, A., An Introduction to the Study of Fishes, Edimbourg, 1880, p. 546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 179 note * Comment se fait-il, en effet, que les Ostéoptérygiens (Dipneustes + Ganoïdes + Téléostéens), qui, depuis le Dévonien inférieur au moins jusqu'au Crétacé, avaient pu s'accommoder de Ventrales abdominales, dans les Conditions d'Existence les plus diverses, ont, plus récemment, acquis des Ventrales thoraciques, et même des Ventrales jugulaires?

Alors que les Chondroptérygiens (Requins + Raies + Chimeres) ont tous, même aujourd'hui, et depuis toujours, des Ventrales abdominales.

Quant aux Ventrales mentonnieres, elles se comprennent très bien, du moment que ces organes deviennent tactiles: c'est la transformation en Barbillons, pour des Foissons vivant directement sur le fond.

page 180 note * Alcock, A., Investigator, etc., p. 78.Google Scholar

page 180 note † Jordan, D. S. and Evermann, B. W., “The Fishes of North and Middle America,” Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus., No. 47 (Part IV.), Washington, 1900, pl. ccclv., figs. 872 et 873.Google Scholar

page 180 note ‡ Day, F., The Fishes of Great Britain and Ireland, Londres, 1880–1884, vol. i., pi. lx., fig. 3.Google Scholar

page 180 note § Dollo, L., Poissons de l'Expédition Antarctique Beige, etc., p. 23Google Scholar

page 181 note * Dollo, L., Poissons de l'Expédition Antarctique Beige, etc., pp. 188 et 235.Google Scholar

page 181 note † Giglioli, H. H., “On a supposed new Genus and Species of Pelagic Gadoid Fishes from the Mediterranean,” Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1889, p. 328.Google Scholar

page 181 note ‡ Alcock, A., Investigator, etc., p. 83.Google Scholar

page 181 note § Dollo, L., “Bathydraco Scotiæ, Poisson abyssal nouveau recueilli par l'Expédition Antarctique Nationale Ecossaise,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 1906, vol. xxxi. p. 73.Google Scholar