Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T04:54:27.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II.—A Biometrical Study of the Relative Degree of Purity of Race of the Tasmanian, Australian, and Papuan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Richard J. A. Berry ,
A. W. D. Robertson  and
K. Stuart Cross
Richard J. A. Berry
Affiliation:
Anatomy Department of the University of Melbourne
A. W. D. Robertson
Affiliation:
Anatomy Department of the University of Melbourne
K. Stuart Cross
Affiliation:
Anatomy Department of the University of Melbourne
Get access

Extract

If the marked divergence of ethnological opinion concerning the degree of racial purity or admixture of the Australian aboriginal affords evidence of anything at all, it can only be of the fact that the problems of his origin, as of his degree of racial purity, are not yet solved. Not only are there the most conflicting opinions on these points, but the cognate subjects of the origin, and degree of purity of the Tasmanian, and of his relationship, if any, to the Australian, are equally undetermined, whilst there is lastly the debatable point of the relation of both those primitive peoples to the Papuan.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 31 , 1912 , pp. 17 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS REFERRED TO IN THE TEXT

(1) Keane, A. H., The World's Peoples, Hutchinson & Co., London, 1908.Google Scholar
(2) Keane, A. H., Ethnology, University Press, Cambridge, 1901.Google Scholar
(3) Topinard, P., Anthropology, Chapman & Hall, Ltd., London, 1894.Google Scholar
(4) Tylor, E. B., Anthropology, Macmillan & Co., London, 1904.Google Scholar
(5) Curr, E. M., The Australian Race, vol. i. p. 152 et seq., London, 1886.Google Scholar
(6) De Quatrefages, A., The Human Species, London, 1890, 5th edition.Google Scholar
(7) Klaatsch, A., “The Skull of the Australian Aboriginal”, Reports from the Path. Lab. of the Lunacy Dept., N.S.W., vol. i. p. 45 et seq.Google Scholar
(8) Schötensack, O., “Die Bedeutung Australiens för die Heranbildung des Menschen aus einer niederen Form”, Zeitschr. Ethnol., 33. Jhrg., 1901, S. 127 ff.Google Scholar
(9) Semon, R., “Australier und Papua”, Corr. Bl. deutsch. Ges. Anthrop., xxxii., 1902, pp. 4, 11, 22, 32.Google Scholar
(10) Berry, R. J. A., “A Living Descendant of an Extinct (Tasmauian) Race”, Proc. Roy. Soc. of Victoria, vol. xx. (N.S., Part I.), 1907, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
(11) Turner, W. M. Sir, “The Craniology, Racial Affinities, and Descent of the Aborigines of Tasmania”, Trans. Roy. Soc. of Edinburgh, vol. xlvi., 1908, pp. 365–403.Google Scholar
(12) Berry, R. J. A., and Robertson, A. W. D., “Preliminary Communication on Fifty-three Tasmanian Crania, forty-two of which are now recorded for the first time”, Proc. Roy. Soc. of Victoria, vol. xxii. (N.S., Part I.), 1909, pp. 47–58.Google Scholar
(13) Berry, R. J. A., and Robertson, A. W. D., “Preliminary Account of the Discovery of Forty-two hitherto unrecorded Tasmanian Crania”, Anatomischer Anzeiger, Bd. xxxv., 1909, pp. 11–17.Google Scholar
(14) Flower, W. M. H. Sir, Catalogue of Osteological Specimens in the Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, Part I., 2nd edition, Taylor & Francis, London.Google Scholar
(15) Davis, Barnard, Thesaurus Craniorum.Google Scholar
(16) Ling Roth, H., The Aborigines of Tasmania, London, 1890.Google Scholar
(17) Harper, W. E., and Clarke, A. H., “Notes on the Measurements of the Tasmanian Crania in the Tasmanian Museum, Hobart”, Papers and Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasmania, 1897, pp. 97–110.Google Scholar
(18) Berry, R. J. A., and Robertson, A. W. D., “Dioptrographic Tracings in Four Normse of Fifty-two Tasmanian Crania”, Trans. Roy. Soc. of Victoria, vol. v., 1910.Google Scholar
(19) Gray, J., “Measurements of Papuan Skulls”, Journ. Anthrop. Inst. of Great Britain and Ireland, vol. xxxi., 1901, p. 261.Google Scholar
(20) SirTurner, W. M., “Decorated and Sculptured Skulls from New Guinea”, Proc. Roy. Soc. of Edinburyh, vol. xxii., 1898–1899, p. 553.Google Scholar
(21) Dorsey, and Holmes, , “Observations on a Collection of Papuan Crania”, Publications of the Field Columbian Museum, Anthropological Series, vol. ii., No. 1, 1897, p. 1.Google Scholar
(22) Gray, J., “The Analysis of Anthropometric Statistics”, Proc. Anat. and Anthrop. Soc. Aberdeen, 1902–1904, p. 85.Google Scholar
(23) Worthington, R., “On Professor Pearson's Contributions to Osteology”, Journ. Anat. and Phys., vol. xxxv., 1901, pp. 455–475.Google Scholar
(24) Schwalbe, G., “Studien über Pithecanthropus erectus Dubois”, Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie, Bd. i., Heft 1, 1899, p. 16 et seq.Google Scholar
(25) Krause, W., “Australische Schädel”, Verh. Berlin. Ges. Anthrop., 1897, p. 508.Google Scholar
(26) Broca, P., “Sur la classification et la nomenclature d'après les indices céphaliques”, Revue d'Anthropologie, vol. i., 1872, p. 385.Google Scholar
(27) Pearson, K., and Lee, A., “Data for the Problem of Evolution in Man: A First Study of the Correlation of the Human Skull“, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. cxcvi.Google Scholar
(28) Hatai, S., “Studies on the Variation and Correlation of Skull Measurements in both Sexes of Mature Albino Rats”, American Journal of Anatomy, vol. vii., 1907–1908, pp. 423–441.Google Scholar
(29) Tschepourkowsky, , “Contributions to the Study of Interracial Correlation”, Biometrika, vol. iv. pp. 286–312.Google Scholar
(30) Rev.Mathew, J., Eaglehawk and Crow, London and Melbourne, 1899.Google Scholar
(31) Meyer, A. B., “Über hundert fiinf und dreissig Papua-Schädel von Neu Guinea nnd der Insel Mysore (Geelvinksbai)”, Mittheil. des hgl. Zoolog. Mus. Dresden. Google Scholar