Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:38:16.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5. On Knots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

Get access

Extract

At the last meeting of the Society I stated that I had just procured a remarkable essay by Listing, part of which bears on the subject of knots, and that I had found in it an example of a change of form not producible by the modes of deformation I had employed.

It had for some time struck me as very singular that, thoug I could easily prove that (when nugatory intersections are removed) a knot in which the crossings are alternately over and under is not farther reducible, I could not prove all its possible deformations to be producible by inversions or projections of the kinds specified in my paper; but, as soon as I recognised the existence of amphicheiral forms, I saw that it was probable that they would furnish a key to my difficulty. I immediately set to work to classify the simpler of such forms; and while I was thus engaged I got the Göttinger Studien for 1847, in which is Listing's paper, with the title Vorstudien zur Topologie.

Type
Proceedings 1876-77
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1878

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 310 note * (Added Feb. 7.)—I have just found symbols for which this is not the case. The following single instance is sufficient, for the present, to show that the type-symbol is not always equivalent to the scheme. The symbol

may represent either a continuous curve with 7 intersections, or a complex system consisting of a circle intersected at six points by a skewed figure of 8. I shall discuss the subject fully in a paper “On Links,” which I have in preparation.