Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:49:38.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The zooplankton of the Forth, Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

C. J. L. Taylor
Affiliation:
Tidal Waters Section, Forth River Purification Board, Port Edgar Marina, South Queensferry EH30 9SQ, Scotland, U.K.
Get access

Synopsis

A description of the community structure of the Forth estuary's zooplankton was obtained by sampling monthly at nine stations ranging from fresh water to fully marine conditions for an eighteen-month period. The variation in species abundance and distribution is related to environmental variables. The apparent spatial and temporal successions of members of the Acartia species complex are described, as are the episodes of predation spreading from the firth and the domination of the upper estuary by Eurytemora. It is observed that the estuary of the Forth is rare among British estuaries in its ability to support a truly pelagic self-maintaining assemblage of species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brylinski, J. M., 1981. Report on the presence of Acartia tonsa in the harbour of Dunkirk and its geographical distribution in Europe. Journal of Plankton Research 3, 255260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, N. R., & Williams, R., 1982. Zooplankton communities in the Bristol Channel and Severn Estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series 9, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, R. J., 1979. Secondary production as an ecological phenomenon. In Zoogeography and diversity in plankton, eds. van der Spoel, S., & Pierrot-Bults, A. C., pp. 5086. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Crisafi, P., & Crescenti, M., 1972. Comportomento, morfologia, sviluppo, misure, componenti e revisione di otto specie della famiglia Acartiidae incontrate in acquae marine inquinate sopratutto da scarichi industriali. Bolletina di Pesca Piscicollura e Idriobiologia 27, 221253.Google Scholar
Elliott, M., & Kingston, P. F., 1987. The sublittoral benthic fauna of the estuary and Firth of Forth, Scotland. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 93B, 449465.Google Scholar
Elliott, M., & Taylor, C. J. L., 1983. The structure and dynamics offish populations in the Forth estuary. Forth River Purification Board unpublished internal report ES2/83.Google Scholar
Elliott, M., & Tayler, C. J. L., In press. The structure and functioning of an estuarine/marine fish community in the Forth Estuary, Scotland. Proceedings of the 21st European Marine Biology Symposium, Gdansk (in press).Google Scholar
Frolander, H. F., 1968. Statistical variation in zooplankton numbers from subsampling with a Stempel pipette. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 40, R82–R88.Google Scholar
Gauch, H. G., 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, J. S., 1981. The ecology of marine sediments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heip, C., 1972. The reproductive potential of copepods in brackish water. Marine Biology 12, 219221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffries, H. P., 1962a. Copepod indicator species in estuaries. Ecology 43, 730733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferies, H. P., 1962b. Succession of two Acartia species in estuaries. Limnology and Oceanography 9, 348358.Google Scholar
Jefferies, H. P., 1967. Saturation of estuarine zooplankton by congeneric associates. In Estuaries, ed. Lauff, G. F., pp. 500508. Publication of the American Association for the Advancement of Science 83.Google Scholar
McLusky, D. S., Bryant, D. M., Elliott, M., Teare, M., & Moffat, G., 1976. Intertidal fauna of the industrialised Forth estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin 7, 4851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C. B., 1983. The zooplankton of estuaries. In Estuaries and enclosed seas, ed. Ketchum, B. H., pp. 103149. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Neale, I. M., & Bayly, I. A. E., 1974. Studies on the ecology of the zooplankton of four estuaries in Victoria, Australia. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Resources, 25, 337350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrot-Bults, A. L., & van der Spoel, S., 1979. Speciation in macrozooplankton. In Zoogeography and diversity in plankton, eds. van der Spoel, S., & Pierrot-Bults, A. L., London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Reeve, M. R., & Baker, L. D., 1975. Production of two planktonic carnivores (chaetognath and ctenophore) in south Florida inshore waters. Fisheries Bulletin 73, 238248.Google Scholar
Sameoto, D. D., 1975. Tidal and diurnal effects on zooplankton sampling variability in a nearshore marine environment. Journal of the Fisheries Resources Board of Canada 32, 347366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, T., 1905. Catalogue of land, freshwater and marine Crustacea in the basin of the river Forth and its estuary. Proceedings of the Royal Physical Society of Edinburgh 16, 97193; 267–386.Google Scholar
Steedman, H. F., 1976. Zooplankton fixation and preservation. UNESCO Monographs on Oceanographic Methodology 4. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. J. L., 1983. The zooplankton of the Forth. Forth River Purification Board unpublished internal report ES3/83.Google Scholar
Thorsen, G., 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates with special reference to planktonic larvae in the sound (Oresund). Meddelelser fra Danmarks Fiskeri-og Havundersogelser 4, 1523.Google Scholar
Uye, S., & Fleminger, A., 1976. Effects of various environmental factors on egg development of several species of Acartia in southern California. Marine Biology 38, 253262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venrick, E. L., 1971. The statistics of subsampling. Limnology and Oceanography 16, 811818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinogradov, M. E., 1970. Vertical distribution of the oceanic zooplankton. Academy of Sciences, USSR Institute of Oceanography. Israel Programme for Scientific Translations. Jerusalem: Keter Press.Google Scholar
Zillioux, E. J., & Gonzalez, J. G., 1972. Egg dormancy in a neritic calanoid copepod and its implications to overwintering in boreal waters. In Proceedings of the Fifth European Marine Biological Symposium, ed. Battaglia, B., pp. 219230. Padova: Piccin Editore.Google Scholar