Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-n2sc8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-09T22:46:37.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXVI.—The Induction of Pregnancy in the Golden Hamster during the Breeding Pause

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

O. Peczenik
O. Peczenik
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Glasgow.
Get access

Extract

In 1930 ovulation in ferrets outside the breeding season was obtained by Hill and Parkes (1930) by means of gonadotrophic extracts. Later, similar results were obtained in sheep and thus it became possible to induce pregnancy outside the normal breeding season (Cole and Miller, 1933), and its practical importance was investigated by Parkes and Hammond (1940). Similar experiments on the golden hamster, Cricetus auratus, are described below, as this animal has proved to be a most interesting subject for the study of sex hormones (Klein, 1937 and 1938; Peczenik, 1942).

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , 1942 , pp. 368 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Bruce, H. M., and Hindle, E., 1934. “The Golden Hamster, Cricetus (Mesocricetus) auratus Waterhouse. Notes on its breeding and growth,” Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., vol. i, pp. 361–366.Google Scholar
Cole, H. H., and Miller, R. F., 1933. “Artificial Induction of Ovulation and Œstrum in the Ewe during Anœstrum,” Amer. Journ. Physiol., vol. civ, pp. 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courrier, R., 1925. “Nymphomanie et Ovaries Kystiques,” C.R. Soc. Biol., vol. xciii, pp. 674–675.Google Scholar
Deanesly, R., 1938. “The Reproductive Cycle of the Golden Hamster (Cricetus auratus)” Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., vol. cviii, A, pp. 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fevold, H. L., and Hisaw, F. L., 1934. “Interactions of Gonad-Stimulating Hormones in Ovarian Development,” Amer. Journ. Physiol., vol. cix, pp. 655–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J., 1938. “Recent Scientific Research on Horse Breeding Problems,” Trans. Yorks. Soc., vol. xcv, pp. 11–16.Google Scholar
Hammond, J., 1941. “Fertility in Mammals and Birds,” Biol. Rev., vol. xvi, pp. 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, M., and Parkes, A. S., 1930. “The Induction of Ovulation in the Anœstrous Ferret,” Proc. Roy. Soc., B, vol. cvii, pp. 39–49.Google Scholar
Klein, M., 1937. “The Mucification of the Vaginal Epithelium in Rodents,” Proc. Roy. Soc., B, vol. cxxiv, pp. 23–28.Google Scholar
Klein, M., 1938. “Relation between the Uterus and the Ovaries in the Pregnant Hamster,” Proc. Roy. Soc., B, vol. cxxv, pp. 348–364.Google Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A., 1942. “Exteroceptive Factors in Sexual Periodicity,” Biol. Rev., vol. xvii, pp. 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkes, A. S., and Hammond, J., 1940. “Induction of Fertility by the Injection of Gonadotrophic Preparations,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., vol. xxxiii pp. 483–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peczenik, O., 1942. “Actions of Sex Hormones on Œstrous Cycle and Reproduction of the Golden Hamster,” Journ. Endocrin., vol. iii (in press).Google Scholar
Pincus, G., 1939. “The comparative Behaviour of Mammalian Eggs in Vivo and in Vitro,” Journ. exper. Zool., vol. lxxxiii, pp. 85–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinach, E., Staheli, A., and Gruter, F. (see Staheli, A., 1935). “Behebung der Sterilitat bei Landwirtschaftlichen Nutztieren,” Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilk., vol. lxxvii, pp. 511–517.Google Scholar