Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T22:30:44.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XIX.—Morphology and Histology of the Males of Acanthobonellia.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

A. K. DattaGupta  and
P. K. B. Menon
A. K. DattaGupta
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Birla College, Pilani
P. K. B. Menon
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Birla College, Pilani
Get access

Synopsis

Morphology and histology of the males of Acanthobonellia miyajimai (Ikeda) and Acanthobonellia vulgaris Menon and DattaGupta have been described. The males of the two species are large and look alike in all respects. Ciliated epithelium, subepidermal glands and two to four seminal vesicles are characteristics of these worms. The alimentary canal is in the form of a chain of vesicles which appear to be a common feature of Acanthobonellia, Acanthohamingia or Ikedella. Anatomical features have been described and figured.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 68 , Issue 4 , 1964 , pp. 267 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Davenport, H. A., 1960. Histological and Histochemical Techniques, pp. 223–224. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.Google Scholar
Fisher, W. K., 1946. “Echiuroid Worms of North Pacific Ocean”, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., 96, 215–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, W. K., 1947. “New Genera and Species of Echiuroid and Sipunculoid Worms”, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., 97, 351–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, L. H., 1951. The Invertebrates, Vol. II, pp. 465–466. London and New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Ikeda, I., 1904. “The Gephyrea of Japan”, J. Coll. Sci. Tokyo, 20, 1–86.Google Scholar
Ikeda, I., 1910. “Notes on a Deep Sea Echiuroid Acanthohamingia shiplei (n. gen. et n. sp.) with Remarks on the Species Hamingia ijimai Ikeda”, Quart. J. Micr. Sci., 56, 135–147.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H., and Tiegs, O. W., 1919. “Pseudobonellia a new Individual Genus from the Great Barrier Reef”, Proc. Linn. Soc, N.S.W., 44 213–230.Google Scholar
Lankester, E. R., 1883. “On Specimens of the Gephyrean Hamingia arctica Kor and Dan from the Hardangal Fjord”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 2, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menon, P. K. B., DattaGupta, A. K., and Johnson, P. “Report on the Bonellids Collected from the Gulf of Kutch and Port Blair (Andaman Islands).” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. [In the Press.]Google Scholar
Onoda, K., 1934. “On Pseudobonellia, a New Genus of the Bonellian Echiuroids”, Annot. Zool. Jap., 14, 413–420.Google Scholar
Selenka, E., 1878. “Das Mannchen der Bonellia”, Zool. Anz., I, 120–121.Google Scholar
Stephen, A. C, 1956. “Amalosoma eddystonense sp. n. A New Species of Bonellidæ“, J. Mar. Biol. Ass., U.K., 35, 605–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar