Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T07:12:26.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XI.—The Occurrence in the Uredinales of Species with Unstable Life-History*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

Malcolm Wilson
Malcolm Wilson
Affiliation:
From the Mycology Department, University of Edinburgh.
Get access

Extract

In his work on the “Present Evolutionary Tendencies and the Origin of Life Cycles in the Uredinales”, Jackson (1913, p. 7) has pointed out that the general impression among mycologists, until quite recently, has been that the life cycles in existing species of rust are quite definitely fixed. In a review of the small amount of literature that has appeared on this subject, he has shown that this conception is not altogether true, and that it is not at all difficult to find species of rusts which exhibit evidence of being in an unstable condition with reference to life-history. As the literature which he has quoted is almost exclusively American and deals with American species only, it might be inferred that this instability of life-history is not found elsewhere. The purpose of this paper is to review the European literature on this subject, and to describe the occurrence in Great Britain of four rust species of which the life-history is in an unstable condition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , 1948 , pp. 177 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was assisted in publication by a grant from the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland.

References

References to Literature

Arthur, J.C , 1906–1940. “Uredinales in North American Flora”, New York Bot. Gar., VII. 83–1151.Google Scholar
Arthur, J.C, 1928. “Notes on Arctic Uredinales”, Mycologia, xx, 41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, J.C, 1929. The Plant Rusts (Uredinales), New York, 1–446.Google Scholar
Arthur, J.C, 1934. Manual of Rusts in the United States and Canada, Lafayette, Indiana, U.S.A., 1–438.Google Scholar
Bary, A.De, 1863. “Recherches sur le développement de quelques champignons parasites”, Ann. Sci. Nat., ser. 4, xx, 5–148.Google Scholar
Blackman, V. H., and Fraser, H. C. L., 1906. “Further Studies on the Sexuality of the Uredineæ”, Ann. Bot., xx, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critopulos, P. D., 1947. “Production of Teleutospores and Uredospores of Puccinia graminis on Berberis cretica in Nature”, Mycologia, xxxix, 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, G. B., 1936. “Phylogenetic Significance of the Pores in Uredospores”, Mycologia, xvni, 103–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietel, P., 1889. “Verzeichniss Der In Der Umgebung Von Leipzig Beobachteten Uredineen”, S.B. naturf. Ges. Lpz., xvi, 37.Google Scholar
Dietel, P., 1895. “Bemerkungen üiber einige Rostpilze VI”, Mitth. Thuring. bot. Ver., VII, 10–12.Google Scholar
Dietel, P., 1901. “Bemerkungen über primare Uredoformen”, Hedwigia, XL, (130)–(133).Google Scholar
Dietel, P., 1904. “Kurze Bemerkungen über Triphragmium Ultnaria (Schum.)”, Hedwigia, XLIII, 239–241.Google Scholar
Dietel, P., 1904 a. “Betrachtung über die Verteilung der Uredineen auf ihren Nährpflanzen”, Zbl. Bakt.,2 Abt., XIL, 218–234.Google Scholar
Dietel, P., 1922. “Kleine Beitrage zur Systematik der Uredineen II”, Ann. Myc, XX, 174–177.Google Scholar
Dodge, B. O., 1926. “Cytological Evidence bearing on the Sexuality and Origin of Life Cycles in the Uredineæ”, Proc. Intern. Congr. PI. Sci. Ithaca, XI, 1751.Google Scholar
Fischer, E., 1934. “Eine aecidienlose Puccinia auf Tragopogon pratensis”, Ber. Schweiz. bot. Ges., XLIII, 173–176.Google Scholar
Gäumann, E., 1937. “Zur Kenntniss der Puccinia punctata Link.”, Ann. Myc, XXXV, 194–216.Google Scholar
Gäumann, E., 1945. “Über die Puccinia expansa Link.”, Arch. Klaus-Stift. Vererb-Forsch. XX Erganzungsdb., 463.Google Scholar
Grove, W. B., 1913. The British Rust Fungi (Uredinales), Cambridge, 1–412.Google Scholar
Grove, W. B., and Chesters, C. G.C , 1934. “Notes on British Uredinales, including one new to the British Isles”, Trans. Brit. Myc. Soc, XVIII, 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, H. S., 1931. “Present Evolutionary Tendencies and the Origin of Life Cycle in the Uredinales”, Mem. Torr. Bot. Club, XVlll, 1–108.Google Scholar
Jacky, E., 1899. “Die Compositen-Bewohnenden Pucineen Vom Typus Der Puccinia Hieracii Und Deren Specialisierung”, Z. PflKrankh., IX, 193–224, 263–295, 330–346.Google Scholar
Johanson, C. I., 1886. “Ueber die den Hochgebirgen Jamtlands und Harjedalens vorkommenden Peronosporeen, Ustilagineen und Uredineen”, Sot. Zbl., XXVIII, 347 and 377.Google Scholar
Jørstad, I., 1935. “Uredinales and Ustilaginales of Trondelag”, Kgl. Norske Vidensk. Sets. Skrift., XXXVIII, 1–91.Google Scholar
Jørstad, I, 1940. “Uredinales of Northern Norway”, Skr. Norsk. Vidensk. Akad. Oslo Mat. Naturv. Kl., No. 6, 1–145.Google Scholar
Kursanov, L., 1922. “Recherches morphologiques et cytologisches sur les Urédinées”, Bull. Soc. Nat. Moscou., N.S. 31 (i.e. 30), 1–129, 1917.Google Scholar
Lagerheim, G., 1902, in Vestergren, T. “Verzeichniss nebst Diagnosen und kritischen Bemerkungen zu meinem Exsicatenwerke ‘Micromycetes rariones selecti’”, Fasc. 11–17, Bot. Notts., 1902, 160.Google Scholar
Lindfors, T., 1924. “Studien ueber den Entwickelungsverlauf bei einigen Rostpilzen aus zytologischen und anatomischen Gesichsichtspunkten”, Svensk. Bot. Tidsskr., XVIII, 1–84.Google Scholar
Lindroth, J. I., 1902. “Die Umbelliferen-Uredineen, Ada Soc”, Fauna Fl. Fenn., XXIL, 1–224.Google Scholar
Liro, J. L., 1908. “Uredineæ Fennicæ. Finlands Rostsvampar”, Bedr. Finsk. Vetens. Soc, LXV, 1–642.Google Scholar
Magnus, P., 1893. “Ueber die auf Compositen auf tretenden Puccinia mit Teleutosporen vom Typus P. Hieracii nebst einigen Andeutungen über die Zusammenhang ihrer specifischen Entwickelung mit ihrer verticalen Verbreitung”, Ber. deuts. bot. Ges., XI, 453–464.Google Scholar
Mme.Moreau, F., 1914. “Les phénomenès de la sexualitaé chez les Urédinées”, Botaniste, XIII, 145–284.Google Scholar
Newton, M., and Johnston, T., 1937. “Production of Uredinia and Telia of Puccinia graminis on Berberis vulgaris”, Nature, CXXXIX, 800–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olive, E. W., 1908. “Sexual Cell Fusions and Vegetative Nuclear Divisions in the Rusts”, Ann. Bot., XXIL, 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsbottom, J., 1917. “Short Notes. Puccinia hypochceridis”, Journ. Bot., LV, 23.Google Scholar
Ramsbottom, J., 1937. “The Matlock Bath Foray”, Trans. Brit. Myc. Soc, XXI, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rytz, W., 1927. “Einige Beobachtungen an Uredineen gesammelt an der 4 I.P.E. in Rubel, Ergebnisse der internationalen pflanzengeographischen Exkursion durch Sweden und Norway, 1925”, Veroff. geobot. Inst. Rubel, Zurich, IV, 1–18.Google Scholar
Sappin-Trouffy, P., 1896. “Recherches histologiques sur la Famille des Urédinées”, Botaniste, v, 59–224.Google Scholar
Smith, W. G., 1884. “Æcidium Berberidis: Abnormal Growth”, Gard. Chron., XXII, 308.Google Scholar
Sydow, P. and , H., 1902–1912. Monographia Uredinearum I (1902) and III (1912), Leipzig.Google Scholar
Whetzel, H. H., Jackson, H. S., and Mains, F. B. 1925. “The Composite Life-History of Puccinia podophylli Schw.”, Journ. Agric. Res., xxx, 65–79.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., 1919. “Some British Rust Fungi”, Journ. Bot., LVII, 163.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., 1934. “The Distribution of the Uredineæ in Scotland”, Trans. Bot. Soc. Edin., XXXI, 345–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, G., 1884. Die Pilze; in Rabenhorst, Kryptogamen-Flora Deutschlands Oesterreichs und der Schweiz, 1, 1–924.Google Scholar