Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:04:38.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Water quality of the estuary and Firth of Forth, Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

A. H. Griffiths
A. H. Griffiths
Affiliation:
Forth River Purification Board, Tidal Waters Section, Port Edgar Marina, South Queensferry, Edinburgh EH30 9SQ, Scotland, U.K.
Get access

Synopsis

The major sources of domestic and industrial wastes being discharged into the estuary and firth are described and quantified. The effects of these inputs on the quality of the receiving waters, in terms of their dissolved oxygen and micronutrient levels, are discussed.

In the estuary, nitrate is shown to behave in an essentially conservative manner in the winter months; the ammonia distribution exhibits summer maxima as a direct result of the effluent waste inputs; the orthophosphate distribution is characterised by considerable losses in the upper reaches. The data on lateral distributions of micronutrients show marked gradients.

In the firth the significant improvements in waters off the Edinburgh coastline are described. The influence of the existing major discharges on water quality is shown occasionally to extend to the eastern limit of the firth for ammonia and orthophosphate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 93 , Issue 3-4: The Natural Environment of the Estuary and Firth of Forth , 1987 , pp. 303 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, I. H., Coulson, J. C., Hawkey, P. & Hudson, M. J. 1978. Further mass seabird deaths from paralytic shellfish poisoning. British Birds 71, 58–68.Google Scholar
Billén, G. 1975. Nitrification in the Scheldt Estuary. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 3, 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, P. A. & Salomon, M. 1969. Phosphate adsorption by kaolin in saline environments. Proceedings of the National Shellfish Association 59, 121–125.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. S. R., Butler, J. N. & Stumm, W. 1973. Kinetic study of phosphate reaction with aluminium oxide and kaolinite. Environmental Science and Technology 7, 327–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collett, W. F. & Leatherland, T. M. 1985. The management of water pollution control in the Forth Estuary. Water Pollution Control 84, 233–241.Google Scholar
Corlett, J. 1972. Firth of Forth and Tay. An appraisal of knowledge and present research programmes with suggestions for future research. Plymouth: Institute for Marine Environmental Research.Google Scholar
Covill, R. W. 1973. Bacteriological, biological and chemical parameters employed in the Forth estuary. In Pollution Criteria for Estuaries, eds. Helliwell, P. R. & Bossanyi, J. 9.1–9.62. London: Pentech Press.Google Scholar
Craig, R. E. 1971. Water movements in the Firth of Forth. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 71B, 131–135.Google Scholar
Dooley, H. D. & Payne, R. 1978. Variability of currents and water properties in the outer Firth of Forth. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland internal report (unpublished).Google Scholar
FRPB 1978–1986. Annual Report. Edinburgh: Forth River Purification Board.Google Scholar
FRPB 1981. Hydrographic survey of the Forth estuary from Kincardine to South Queensferry, June 1981. Unpublished Report No. 8/81. Edinburgh: Forth River Purification Board.Google Scholar
FRPB 1982. Seafield—Report on water quality monitoring 1976–1982. Unpublished Report No. ES2/82. Edinburgh: Forth River Purification Board.Google Scholar
FRPB 1986. A second survey of resuspension of solids in the upper Forth estuary. Unpublished Report No. ESI/86. Edinburgh: Forth River Purification Board.Google Scholar
Holmes, G. S. 1978. The chemistry of suspended particulate matter; Firth of Forth. Ph.D. thesis, Edinburgh University.Google Scholar
Knox, S., Whitfield, M., Turner, D. R. & Liddicoat, M. I. 1986. Statistical analysis of estuarine profiles: III. Application to nitrate, nitrite and ammonium in the Tamar estuary. Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science 22, 619–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lothian Regional Council, 1981. Summary report on the results of monthly analysis of estuarine waters and mussels during 1981. Unpublished Report. Edinburgh: Lothian Regional Council.Google Scholar
Mackay, D. W. & Leatherland, T. M. 1976. Chemical processes in an estuary receiving major inputs of industrial and domestic wastes. In Estuarine Chemistry, ed. Burton, J. D. & Liss, P. J., Chap. 7, 185–218. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Morris, A., Bale, A. J. & Howland, R. J. M. 1981. Nutrient distributions in an estuary: evidence of chemical precipitation of dissolved silicate and phosphate. Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science 12, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, P. A., Anderson, K. J., Matthews, J. E., Watson, P. G., Halliday, M. C. & Shiells, G. M. 1982. Water quality in the Firth of Forth. Marine Pollution Bulletin 13, 421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. B., Parsons, T. V. & Cloet, R. L. 1965. An investigation using radioactive tracers into the silt movements in an ebb channel, Firth of Forth, 1965. UKAEA Research Group AERE–R5080. Wantage: AERE/Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Toole, J., Baxter, M. S. & Thomson, J. 1987. The behaviour of uranium isotopes with salinity change in three U.K. estuaries. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 25, 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNESCO 1983. Coastal offshore ecosystems relationships. Final report of SCOR/IABO/Unesco Working Group 65. No. 48. Netherlands.Google Scholar
Webb, A. J. & Metcalfe, A. P. 1987. Physical aspects, water movements and modelling studies of the Forth estuary, Scotland. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 93B, 259–272.Google Scholar