Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:52:20.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) in North America with special reference to its role in British forestry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

L. Roche
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry and Wood Science, University College of North Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, U.K.
P. G. Haddock
Affiliation:
Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Get access

Synopsis

The natural distribution of Sitka spruce is examined in relation to the species' role in British forestry. Particular attention is therefore given to a description of habitats on the Queen Charlotte Islands, and also on the adjacent mainland of British Columbia where Sitka spruce is sympatric with white spruce (Picea glauca) and hybridisation occurs. Examples of genetic variation are given and it is suggested that a knowledge of the genecologv of the species in its natural habitat would help to elucidate its full ecological and genetic potential in Britain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banner, A., Pojar, J. & Trowbridge, R. 1983. Ecosystem classification of the coastal western hemlock zone, Queen Charlotte Island subzone, Prince Rupert Forest Region, B.C. Victoria, B.C.: Report, British Columbia Ministry of Forests.Google Scholar
Burley, J. 1965. Karyotype analysis of Sitka spruce. Silvae Genetica 14, 127132.Google Scholar
Day, W. R. 1957. Sitka spruce in British Columbia: a study in Forest Relationships. Forestry Commission Bulletin 28. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Falkenhagen, E. R. 1977. Genetic variation in 38 provenances of Sitka spruce. Silvae Genetica 26, 6775.Google Scholar
Haeussler, S. et al. 1984. A guide to the coastal western hemlock zone, northern drier maritime subzone in the Prince Rupert Forest Region, B.C. Victoria, B.C.: Land Management Report No. 21, British Columbia Ministry of Forests.Google Scholar
Harris, A. S. 1978. Distribution, genetics and silvical characteristics of Sitka spruce. Proceedings of IUFRO Joint Meeting of Working Parties, Vancouver 1978, Vol. 1, 95122. Victoria, B.C.: British Columbia Ministry of Forests.Google Scholar
Krajina, V. J. 1973. Biogeoclimatic zones of British Columbia. Map drawn by J. T. Swoboda. Victoria, B.C.: Department of Lands, Forests, and Water Resources, British Columbia Ecological Reserves Committee.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. 1982. The Ecosystems of Tree Farm Licence 24, Queen Charlotte Islands B.C. Report Western Forest Products Ltd., Pender Street, Vancouver, B.C.Google Scholar
Nature Conservancy Council 1986. Nature conservation and afforestation in Britain. Report Nature Conservancy Council, U.K. Peterborough: Nature Conservancy Council.Google Scholar
O'Driscoll, J. 1977. Sitka spruce, its distribution and genetic variation. Irish Forestry 34, 416.Google Scholar
Roche, L. 1969. A genecological study of the genus Picea in British Columbia. New Phytologist 68, 505554.Google Scholar
Roche, L. 1970. The silvicultural significance of geographic variation in the white-Engelmann spruce complex in British Columbia. The Forestry Chronicle 46, 116125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, L. & Fowler, D. P. 1975. The genetics of Sitka spruce. USDA Forest Service Research Paper WO-26.Google Scholar
Schaefer, D. G. 1978. An overview of the climates of Western North America. Proceedings IUFRO Joint Meeting of working parties, Vancouver 1978, Vol. 1, 123. Victoria, B.C.: British Columbia Ministry of Forests.Google Scholar
Walmsley, M., Utzig, G., Void, T., Moon, D. & Van Barneveld, J. 1980. Describing ecosystems in the field. R.A.B. Technical Paper No. 2, Land Management Report No. 7. Victoria, B.C.: British Columbia Ministry of Forests.Google Scholar