Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:43:21.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sitka spruce mycorrhizas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Christopher Walker
Affiliation:
Forestry Commission, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY, Scotland, U.K.
Get access

Synopsis

Relatively little research has been done on mycorrhizas of Sitka spruce, although greenhouse studies have confirmed that its growth can be improved by the introduction of mycorrhizal fungi. Work in nurseries is difficult under British conditions and it probably will be necessary to disinfest soil in seedbeds before mycorrhizal treatment can be applied. Results from forest trials show that inoculation with selected mycorrhizal fungi can give significant early growth effects, though how long these will persist is unknown. In such work, careful attention must be given to selection of controls. Features covered in this review include a discussion of fungi mycorrhizal with Sitka spruce, identification of mycorrhizas, nutrient uptake, and growth enhancement of seedlings and transplants.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, S. N., Cooper, J. E., Dickson, D. A., Dickson, E. L., & Seaby, D. A. 1978. Some effects of lime and fertilizer on a Sitka spruce plantation. Forestry 51, 5765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, I. J. 1981. Picea sitchensis and Lactarius rufus mycorrhizal association and its effects on seedling growth and development. Transations of the British Mycological Society 76, 417423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, I. J. 1983. The significance of ectomycorrhizas in the nitrogen cycle. In Nitrogen as an Ecological Factor, eds. Lee, J. A., McNeill, S., & Rorison, I. H., pp. 6993. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Alexander, I. J., & Fairley, R. I. 1983. Effects of N fertilisation on populations of fine roots and mycorrhizas in spruce humus. Plant and Soil 71 4953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, I. J., & Fairley, R. I. 1986. Growth and nitrogen uptake rates of ectomycorrhizal spruce seedlings. In Physiological and Genetkal Aspects of Mycorrhizae, eds. Gianinazzi-Pearson, V., & Gianinazzi, S., pp. 377382. Paris: INRA.Google Scholar
Alexander, I. J., & Hardy, K. 1981. Surface phosphatase activity of Sitka spruce mycorrhizas from a serpentine site. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 13, 301305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, I. J., & Watling, R. 1987. Macrofungi of Sitka spruce in Scotland. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 93B, 107115.Google Scholar
Bakshi, B. K. 1974. Mycorrhiza and its role in forestry. Dehra Dunn, India: Forest Research Institute.Google Scholar
Bigg, W. L., & Alexander, I. J. 1981. A culture unit for the study of nutrient uptake by intact mycorrhizal plants under aseptic conditions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 13, 7778.Google Scholar
Burton, K. W., Morgan, E., & Roig, A. 1984. The influence of heavy metals upon the growth of Sitkaspruce in South Wales forests. II. Greenhouse experiments. Plant and Soil 78, 271282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilvers, G. A. 1968. Some distinctive types of eucalypt mycorrhizas. Australian Journal of Botany 16, 4970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutts, M. P., & Philipson, J. J. 1987. Structure and physiology of Sitka spruce roots. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 93B, 131144.Google Scholar
Ferrier, R. C., & Alexander, I. J. 1985. Persistence under field conditions of excised fine roots and mycorrhizas of spruce. In Ecological Interactions in the Soil: Plants, Microbes and Animals, eds. Fitter, A. H., Atkinson, D., Read, D. J., & Usher, M. B., pp. 175179. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Fleming, L. V. 1984. Effects of soil trenching and coring on the formation of ectomycorrhizas on birch seedlings grown around mature trees. New Phytologist 98, 143153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gianinazzi-Pearson, V., & Gianinazzi, S. 1986. Physiological and Genetkal Aspects of Mycorrhizae. Paris: INRA.Google Scholar
Hacskaylo, E., (ed.) 1971. Mycorrhizae. Washington D.C.,: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Handley, W. R. C. 1963. Mycorrhizal Associations and Calluna Heathland Afforestation. Forestry Commission Bulletin 36. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Harley, J. L. 1959. The Biology of Mycorrhiza. London: Leonard Hill.Google Scholar
Harley, J. L., & Smith, S. E. 1983. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Holden, J. M., Thomas, G. W., & Jackson, R. M. 1983. Effects of mycorrhizal inocula on the growth of Sitka spruce seedlings in different soils. Plant and Soil 71, 313317.Google Scholar
James, H., Court, M. N., Macleod, D. A., & Parsons, J. W. 1978. Relationship between growth of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis), soil factors and mycorrhizal activity on basaltic soils in Western Scotland. Forestry 51, 105119.Google Scholar
Last, F. T., Mason, P. A., & Wilson, J. 1984. Controlled inoculation of Sitka spruce with sheathing (ecto-)mycorrhizal fungi—a commercial experience in 1982. Scottish Forestry 38, 7577.Google Scholar
Levisohn, I. 1954. Aberrant root infections of pine and spruce seedlings. New Phytologist 53, 284290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levisohn, I. 1965. Mycorrhizal investigations. In Experiments on nutrition problems in forest nurseries, ed. Benzian, B.. Forestry Commission Bulletin 37, pp. 228235. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Malcolm, D. C. 1975. The influence of heather on silvicultural practice—an appraisal. Scottish Forestry 29, 1424.Google Scholar
Marks, G. C., & Kozlowski, T. T. 1973. Ectomycorrhizae: Their Ecology and Physiology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mason, P. A., Last, F. T., & Wilson, J. 1986. Effects of different soils on establishment and influence of sheathing mycorrhizas. In Physiological and Genetkal Aspects of Mycorrhizae, eds. Gianinazzi-Pearson, V., & Gianinazzi, S., pp. 767772. Paris: INRA.Google Scholar
Mason, P. A., Wilson, J., Last, F. T., & Walker, C. 1983. The concept of succession in relation to the spread of sheathing mycorrhizal fungi on inoculated tree seedlings growing in unsterile soils. Plant and Soil 71, 247256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mexal, J. G. 1980. Aspects of mycorrhizal inoculation in relation to reforestation. New Zealand Journal of Forest Science 10, 208217.Google Scholar
Miller, H. G., Alexander, C., Cooper, J., Keenleyside, J., McKay, H., Miller, J. D., & Williams, B. L. 1986. Maintenance and Enhancement of Forest Productivity through Manipulation of the Nitrogen Cycle. Aberdeen: The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research.Google Scholar
Molina, R. 1982. Use of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria laccata in forestry. I. Consistency between isolates in effective colonization. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 12, 469473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molina, R., (ed.). 1985. Proceedings of the 6th North American Conference on Mycorrhizae. Corvallis, Oregon: Forest Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
Molina, R., & Trappe, J. M. 1982. Patterns of ectomycorrhizal host specificity and potential amongst Pacific Northwest conifers and fungi. Forest Science 28, 423457.Google Scholar
Rayner, M. C., & Nielson-Jones, W., 1944. Problems in tree nutrition. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Read, D. J., & Armstrong, W. 1972. A relationship between oxygen transport and the formation of the ectotrophic mycorrhizal sheath in conifer seedlings. New Phytologist 71, 4953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, D. J., & Finley, R. D. 1985. Mycorrhizas and inter-plant transfer of nutrients. I. Ectomycorrhizas. In Proceedings of the 6th North American Conference on Mycorrhizae. ed. Molina, R., pp. 319320. Corvallis, Oregon: Forest Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
Richard, C., & Fortin, J. A. 1974. Distribution geographique, écologie. physiologie, pathogenecité et sporulation du Mycelium radicis atrovirens. Extrait de phytoprolection 55, 6788.Google Scholar
Rygiewicz, P. T., & Bledsoe, C. S. 1984. Mycorrhizal effects on potassium fluxes by Northwest coniferous seedlings. Plant Physiology 76, 918923.Google Scholar
Rygiewicz, P. T., Bledsoe, C. S., & Zasoski, R. J. 1984a. Effects of ectomycorrhizae and solution pH on [15N]ammonium uptake by coniferous seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 14, 885892.Google Scholar
Rygiewicz, P. T., Bledsoe, C. S., & Zasoski, R. J., 1984b. Effects of ectomycorrhizae and solution pH on [15N]nitrate uptake by coniferous seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 14, 893899.Google Scholar
Shaw, C. G. III, 1980. Formation of ectomycorrhizae following inoculation of containerized Sitka spruce seedlings. Research Note PNW-351. Portland, Oregon: Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Shaw, C. G. 1987. Effects of fertilizer form and fungal strain on the development of ectomycorrhizae on Sitka spruce seedlings. New Forests (submitted).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, C. G., & Sidle, R. C. 1984. Evaluation of planting sites common to southeast Alaska clear-cut. II. Available inoculum of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Cenococcum geophilum. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13, 911.Google Scholar
Shaw, C. G., Molina, R., & Walden, J. 1982. Development of ectomycorrhizae following inoculation of containerized Sitka and white spruce seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 12, 191195.Google Scholar
Shaw, C. G., Jackson, R. M., & Thomas, G. W. 1985. Effects of fertilization and fungal strain on ectomycorrhizal development of Sitka spruce seedlings. In Proceedings of the 6th North American Conference on Mycorrhizae, ed. Molina, R., p. 217. Corvallis, Oregon: Forest Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
Shaw, C. G., Sidle, R. C., & Harris, A. S. 1987. Evaluation of planting sites common to Southeast Alaska clear-cut. III. Effects of microsite type and ectomycorrhizal inoculation on growth and survival of Sitka spruce seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17, 334339.Google Scholar
Sidle, R. C., & Shaw, C. G. III, 1987. Evaluation of planting sites common to southeast Alaska clear-cut. IV. Nutrient levels in ectomycorrhizal Sitka spruce seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17, 340345.Google Scholar
Tabbush, P. 1986. Rough handling, soil temperature and root development in outplanted Sitka spruce and Douglas fir. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 16, 13851388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. M. A. 1986. The return of nursing mixtures. Forestry and British Timber 14, 1819.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. M. A. 1987. The effects of nitrogen fertiliser at different rates and times of application on the growth of Sitka spruce in upland Britain. Forestry 60 (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, G. W., & Jackson, R. M. 1979. Sheathing mycorrhizas of nursery grown Picea sitchensis. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 73, 117125.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. W., & Jackson, R. M. 1982. Scanning electron microscopy of sheathing mycorrhizas of Sitka spruce. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 79, 3139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, G. W., & Jackson, R. M., 1983. Growth responses of Sitka spruce seedlings to mycorrhizal inoculation. New Phytologist 95, 223229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, G. W., Clarke, C. A., Mosse, B., & Jackson, R. M. 1982. Source of phosphate taken up from two soils by mycorrhizal (Thelephora terrestris) and non-mycorrhizal Picea sitchensis seedlings. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 14, 7375.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. W., Rogers, D. R., & Jackson, R. M. 1983. Changes in the mycorrhizal status of Sitka spruce following outplanting. Plant and Soil 71, 319323.Google Scholar
Trappe, J. M. 1962. Fungus associates of ectotrophic mycorrhizae. Botanical Review 38, 538606.Google Scholar
Tyler, G. 1985. Macrofungal flora of Swedish beech forest related to soil organic matter and acidity characteristics. Forest Ecology and Management 10, 1329.Google Scholar
Walker, C. 1986a. Mycorrhizal growth enhancement in Sitka spruce seedlings differs in nonsterile compared to sterilized soil. In Proceedings of the 6th North American Conference on Mycorrhizae, ed. Molina, R., p. 213. Corvallis, Oregon: Forest Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
Walker, C. 1986b. Mycorrhizas. Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research 1985, pp. 3334. London. Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Walker, C., Biggin, P., & Jardine, D. C. 1986. Differences in mycorrhizal status among clones of Sitka spruce. Forest Ecology and Management 14, 275283.Google Scholar
Wilson, J., Mason, P. A., Last, F. T., Ingleby, K., and Munro, R. C. 1987(?). Ectomycorrhiza formation and growth of Sitka spruce seedlings at first rotation forest sites in Northern Britain. Canadian Journal of Forest Research (submitted).Google Scholar
Yang, C. S., & Korf, R. P. 1985. Ascorhizoctonia gen. nov. and Complexipes emend., two genera for anamorphs of species assigned to Tricharina (Discomycetes). Mycotaxon 23, 457481.Google Scholar