Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:18:19.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The significance of reed beds on siltation in the Tay Estuary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

S. A. K. Alizai  and
J. McManus
S. A. K. Alizai
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Dundee
J. McManus
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Dundee
Get access

Synopsis

The Phragmites communis marshes occupy 250–330 hectares bordering the northern tidal flats of the Tay Estuary. The outer edge of the marsh forms a step up to 50 cm in height. Reed stems grow with densities of 90–150/m2 and break to produce upward facing cylinders which entrap sediments. Measured daily accretion rates in broken stems varied from 001 g to 0.07 g. Sedimentation was greatest during spring tides, but decreased with falling tidal range. Accretion of 16 g per stem is normal and many stem plugs have greater weight. Annual rates of contribution from instem accumulation vary between 0.9 and 2.6 kg/m2 on the marsh margin. Stem fall provides cylindrical sedimentary lumps to the marsh sediments, whose internal structure reveals nodules and thin laminae juxtaposed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 78 , Issue 3-4 , 1980 , pp. s1 - s13
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, F. E., 1972. Resuspension of estuarine sediments by small amplitude waves. J. Sedim. Petrol., 42, 602–607.Google Scholar
Buller, A. T., 1975. Sediments of the Tay Estuary. II. Formation of ephemeral zones of high suspended sediment concentration. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 75B, 65–89.Google Scholar
Buller, A. T., Green, C. D. and McManus, J., 1975. Dynamics of sedimentation: The Tay in comparison with other estuaries. In Hails, J. and Carr, A. J., (eds) Near Shore Sediment Dynamics, 201–249. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Buller, A. T. and McManus, J., 1975. Sediments of the Tay Estuary. I. Bottom sediments of the upper and upper middle reaches. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 75B, 41–64.Google Scholar
Buller, A. T. and McManus, J., 1976. Fluctuations of suspended sediments in estuaries: a descriptive review. Tay Estuary Research Centre Internal Report No. 3. Univ. Dundee. 39p.Google Scholar
Chapman, V. J., 1938. Coastal movement and the development of some New England Salt Marshes. Proc. Geol. Ass., 49, 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G., 1958. Some aspects of recent sedimentation in the Wash. Eclog. Geol. Helv., 51, 508–515.Google Scholar
Evans, G., 1965. Intertidal flat sediments and their environment of deposition in the Wash. Q. Jl Geol. Soc. Lond., 121,209–241.Google Scholar
Harrison, E. Z. and Bloom, A. L., 1977. Sedimentation rates on tidal salt marshes in Connecticut. J. Sedim. Petrol., 47, 1484–1490.Google Scholar
Ingram, H. A. P., et al. 1980 Phragmites performance in reed beds of the Tay Estuary. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 78B, s89–s107. Vadehavskyst. Geogr. Tidsskr., 55, 62–87.Google Scholar
McManus, J., 1968. The hydrology of the Tay basin. In Jones, S. J. (ed.) Dundee and District, 107–124. Br. Ass. Advmt Sci., Dundee: Winter.Google Scholar
Oliver, F. W., Bryce, J. and Knowles, F., 1929. Rice grass: its economic possibilities. Misc. Publs Minist. Agric. Fish., Lond., No. 66.Google Scholar
Ranwell, D. S., 1964. Spartina salt marshes in Southern England. II. Rate of seasonal pattern of sediment accretion. J. Ecol., 52, 79–94.Google Scholar
Richards, F. J., 1934. The salt marshes of Dovey estuary. Ann. Bot., 48, 225–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar