Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:14:08.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shellfish tainting – a means of monitoring petroleum-contaminated effluents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Kevin J. Whittle
Affiliation:
Torry Research Station, MAFF, 135 Abbey Road, Aberdeen AB9 8DG, Scotland
Peter R. Mackie
Affiliation:
Torry Research Station, MAFF, 135 Abbey Road, Aberdeen AB9 8DG, Scotland
Harry K. Davis
Affiliation:
Torry Research Station, MAFF, 135 Abbey Road, Aberdeen AB9 8DG, Scotland
Get access

Synopsis

Water from the separation plant at Sullom Voe is discharged into the sea under agreed conditions from a diffuser situated to the north of Calback Ness, close to natural scallop (Pecten maximus) beds.

As part of the arrangements to monitor potential effects of the discharge, Torry Research Station was asked to assess, for petroleum taint, shellfish which would be sampled at intervals from Sullom Voe. To avoid depletion of the natural shellfish beds, queen scallops (Chlamys opercularis) or scallops, whichever were available from other areas, were set out in cages suspended (or on the bottom) 100–1250 m eastwards of the outfall for a period, and then recovered, frozen, and assessed subsequently at the laboratory by a trained taste panel, and compared with the same species unexposed.

The cages were laid on 10 occasions from March 1980 to February 1987. Initially, no petroleum taint was detected. In August 1980 and May 1981, a different flavour, but not recognisable as a petroleum taint, was detected at 800–1000 m from the outfall after three days exposure. In May 1982, 33% of the queen scallops in the cage on the bottom, 100 m south east of the diffuser, were dead after six days exposure, and taint was detected at the threshold level in shellfish in the cage at 300 m. In May 1983, taint and petroleum derived hydrocarbons were detected in the sample from the cage on the bottom, 100 m south east of the diffuser, after seven days exposure. In May 1984, taint was again detected at the bottom, 200 m south east of the outfall, after 10 days exposure.

Enquiries established that the diffuser was not operating with maximum efficiency. Subsequently, monitoring revealed an improvement. Taint assessment proved to be a sensitive detector of petroleum contamination.

Type
Part Two
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bligh, E. G., & Dyer, W. J., 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology 37, 911–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, J. M., & Matheson, I. 1995. Chemical monitoring in Sullom Voe: the SOTEAG and statutory programmes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 103, 4568.Google Scholar
Davis, H. K., Geelhoed, E. N., MacRae, A. W., & Howgate, P., 1992. Sensory analysis of trout tainted by diesel fuel in ambient water. Water Science Technology 25, 1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, J. T., 1995. Measures to combat and control oil pollution in Sullom Voe. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 103, 3144.Google Scholar
GESAMP 1993. Impact of oil and related chemicals and wastes on the marine environment. IMO/FAO/UNESCO/WMO/WHO/IAEA/UN/UNEP. Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Pollution. Rep. Stud. GESAMP (50), 180 pp, International Maritime Organisation, London:Google Scholar
Howgate, P., Mackie, P. R., Whittle, K. J., Farmer, J., Mclntyre, A. D., & Eleftheriou, A., 1977. Petroleum tainting in fish. Rapports et Proces-verbaux des Reunions Conseil International pour l'exploration de la Mer 171, 143–6.Google Scholar
Mackie, P. R., Whittle, K. J., & Hardy, R., 1974. Hydrocarbons in the marine environment. In-Alkanes in the Firth of Clyde. Estuarine & Coastal Marine Science 2, 359–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, P. R., Hardy, R., & Whittle, K. J., 1978. A preliminary assessment of the presence of oil in the ecosystem at Ekofisk following the blow-out, April 22–30, 1977. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 35, 544–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tidmarsh, W. G., Ernst, R., Ackman, R., and Farquarson, T., 1985. Tainting of fishery resources. Environmental Studies Revolving Funds Report No. 021, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Watson, P., 1995. Industry – inputs to the environment. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 103, 21–9.Google Scholar