Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:46:27.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seed origin variation in Sitka spruce

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Roger Lines
Roger Lines
Affiliation:
Forestry Commission, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY, Scotland, U.K.
Get access

Synopsis

Because of the wide latitudinal range of Sitka spruce, trees of different origin show very large differences in growth rate and adaptability when grown on a variety of sites in Britain. The Forestry Commission has forty-eight seed origin trials, planted between 1929 and 1975, which are now beginning to provide a good overall picture of this variation. On the other hand, differences in morphology and colour are relatively minor, so that it is very difficult to identify the seed origin of a stand of trees on visual grounds alone. Southerly origins (below Latitude 47°N) grow fastest, but they suffer more severe frost damage, particularly in the nursery, and tend to have lower density timber than those from 53°N or above.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 93 , Issue 1-2: Sitka Spruce , 1987 , pp. 25 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldhous, J. R. 1962. Provenance of Sitka spruce. Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research, 1961, Part III, pp. 147–154. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Borthwick, A. W. 1924. Seed supply from British Columbia. Forestry Commission Journal 3, 31–33.Google Scholar
Brazier, J. D. 1972. Some observations on the wood of young provenance Sitka spruce grown at Bush and Wykeham. Home Grown Timber Research Committee Paper 243. Princes Risborough: Forest Products Laboratory.Google Scholar
Burley, J. 1965. Variation in seed characteristics of Sitka spruce. Advancing Frontiers of Plant Science 10, 11–24.Google Scholar
Burley, J. 1966a. Genetic variation in seedling development of Sitka spruce. Forestry 39, 68–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burley, J. 1966b. Variation in colour of Sitka spruce seedlings. Quarterly Journal of Forestry 60, 51–54.Google Scholar
Cannell, M. G. R. 1974. Production of branches and foliage by young trees of Pinus contorta and Picea sitchensis: Provenance differences and their simulation. Journal of Applied Ecology 11, 1091–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, M. G. R., Thompson, S. & Lines, R. 1976. An analysis of inherent differences in shoot growth within some north temperate conifers. In Tree Physiology and Yield Improvement, ed. Cannell, M. G. R. & Last, F. T., pp. 173–205. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cannell, M. G. R., & Sheppard, L. J. 1982. Seasonal changes in the frost hardiness of provenances of Picea sitchensis in Scotland. Forestry 55, 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, M. G. R., & Smith, R. I. 1983. Thermal time, chill days and prediction of budburst in Picea sitchensis. Journal of Applied Ecology 20, 951–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, M. G. R., Sheppard, L. J., Smith, R. I. & Murray, M. B. 1985. Autumn frost damage on young Picea sitchensis. 2. Shoot frost hardening and the probability of frost damage in Scotland. Forestry 58, 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, W. R. & Peace, T. R. 1946. Spring frosts. Forestry Commission Bulletin 18, (2nd edn).Google Scholar
Deleporte, P. 1984a L'épicéa de Sitka. AFOCEL—Informations—Forêt 1, (239), 25–39.Google Scholar
Deleporte, P. 1984b. Épicéa de Sitka: Resultats et méthodologie d'une sélection multicritère. Annales de Recherches Silvicoles, pp. 282–337. Paris: AFOCEL.Google Scholar
DSIR 1958. Report on the properties of four different provenance consignments of Sitka spruce. Princes Risborough: Forest Products Laboratory.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. V. 1953. Frost damage to Sitka spruce plants in the nursery and its relation to seed origin. Scottish Forestry 7, 71.Google Scholar
Falkenhagen, E. R. 1977. Genetic variation in 38 provenances of Sitka spruce. Silvae Genetica 26, 67–75.Google Scholar
Falkenhagen, E. R. & Nash, S. W. 1978. Multivariate classification in provenance research. Silvae Genetica 27, 14–23.Google Scholar
Finlay, K. W. & Wilkinson, G. N. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 742–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, A. M. 1976. Seed collection in North-West America with particular reference to a Sitka spruce seed collection for provenance studies. In IUFRO Sitka spruce International Ten Provenance Experiment, ed. O'Driscoll, J., pp. 2–20. Dublin: Department of Lands, Forest and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
Griggs, R. F. 1934. The edge of the forest in Alaska and the reasons for its position. Ecology 15, 80–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkinson, A. D. 1931. Notes on Sitka spruce and other conifers on the Queen Charlotte Islands. Forestry 5, p. 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, T. 1883. Woods, Forests and Estates of Perthshire, p. 25. Perth: Henderson, Robertson and Hunter.Google Scholar
IUFRO, 1968–1970. Circular letters No 6 and No 8 from IUFRO Section 22 providing details of seed tests made at Stend, Norway.Google Scholar
Kleinschmit, J. 1980. Sitka spruce in Germany. In: Proceedings of the IUFRO Joint Meeting of Working Parties, Vancouver, Canada, 1978, Vol 2, pp. 183–191. Vancouver: British Columbia Ministry of Forests.Google Scholar
Kleinschmit, J. & Sauer, A. 1976. UFRO Sitka spruce provenance experiment in Germany—Results of nursery performance. In IUFRO Sitka spruce International Ten Provenance Experiment. Nursery Stage Results, ed. O'Driscoll, J., pp. 68–89. Dublin: Department of Lands, Forest and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
Kranenborg, K. G. & Kriek, W. 1980. Sitka spruce provenances in the Netherlands—Early results. Proceedings of the IUFRO Joint Meeting of Working Parties, Vancouver, Canada, 1978, Vol 2, pp. 193–210. Vancouver: British Columbia Ministry of Forests.Google Scholar
Kraus, J. F. & Lines, R. 1976. Patterns of shoot growth, growth cessation and bud set in a nursery test of Sitka spruce provenances. Scottish Forestry 30, 16–24.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. B. & Lines, R. 1976. Provenance of Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr. IUFRO “top ten” provenances in Great Britain (North)—first year results. In IUFRO Sitka spruce International Ten Provenance Experiment, ed. O'Driscoll, J., pp. 90–105. Dublin: Department of Lands, Forest and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
Lines, R. 1964. Early experiments on the provenance of Sitka spruce. Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research 1963, Part III, pp. 135–146. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Lines, R. 1975. Provenance: Sitka spruce. Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research 1975, pp. 17–18. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Lines, R. 1976a. Provenance: Sitka spruce. Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research 1976, p. 16. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Lines, R. 1976b. Pinus contorta provenance studies. Forestry Commission Research and Development Paper 114.Google Scholar
Lines, R. 1978. Seed origin—Sitka spruce. Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research 1978, pp. 16–18. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Lines, R. 1980. The IUFRO experiments with Sitka spruce in Great Britain. Proceedings of the IUFRO Joint Meeting of Working Parties, Vancouver, Canada, 1978, Vol 2, pp. 211–225. Vancouver: British Columbia Ministry of Forests.Google Scholar
Lines, R. 1983. Sitka spruce. Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research 1983, p. 13. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Lines, R. (in prep.). Choice of Sitka spruce seed origins for use in British forests. Forestry Commission Technical Bulletin.Google Scholar
Lines, R. & Mitchell, A. F. 1965. Provenance: Sitka spruce. Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research 1964, pp. 31–32. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Lines, R. & Mitchell, A. F. 1966. Differences in Phenology of Sitka spruce provenances. Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research 1965, Part III, pp. 173–184. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Lines, R. & Mitchell, A. F. & Mitchell, A. F. 1968. Provenance: Sitka spruce. Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research 1968, pp. 67–70. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Lines, R., & Pearce, M. L. 1971. Provenance: Sitka spruce. Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research 1971, pp. 42–44. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Lines, R., Pearce, M. L. & Mitchell, A. F. 1973. Provenance: Sitka spruce. Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research 1973, pp. 42–45. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Macdonald, J. A. B. 1927. Sitka spruce transplants of different origins: Susceptibility to frost. Forestry Commission Journal 6, 59–60.Google Scholar
Madsen, S. F. (in press) Increment, frost damage and death in the IUFRO international ten provenance experiment with Sitka spruce, established in spring 1975 in Denmark. In IUFRO Working Party Meeting in Edinburgh, September 1984, ed. O'Driscoll, J.Google Scholar
O'Driscoll, J. 1976. IUFRO Sitka spruce International Ten Provenance Experiment—Nursery stage results. Dublin: Department of Lands, Forest and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
O'Driscoll, J. 1978. Sitka spruce international ten provenance experiment. Results to end of nursery stage. Forest Genetics Resources—Information 7, pp. 35–46. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organisation.Google Scholar
Pollard, D. F. W., Teich, A. H. & Logan, K. T. 1976. Seedling shoot and bud development of Sitka spruce, Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr. In IUFRO Sitka spruce International Ten Provenance Experiment. Nursery Stage Results, ed. O'Driscoll, J., pp. 258–277. Dublin: Department of Lands, Forest and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
Redfern, D. B. 1982. Spring frost damage on Sitka spruce. Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research, 1982, p. 27. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Roche, L. & Haddock, P. G. 1987. Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) in North America with special reference to its role in British forestry. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 93B, 1–12.Google Scholar
Schober, R. 1962. Die Sitka-Fichte. Mitt. Niedersach. Forstl. Versuchs. 24/25.Google Scholar
Steven, H. M. 1928. Nursery investigations. Bulletin of the Forestry Commission, London 11.Google Scholar
Stirling Maxwell, J. Sir 1932. Influence of exotic conifers on silviculture. In Conifers in Cultivation, Report of Conifer Conference, Royal Horticultural Society, London, pp. 47–48.Google Scholar
Vaartaja, O. 1959. Evidence of Photoperiodic ecotypes in trees. Ecological Monographs 29, 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, B. G., Mathews, R. W. & Clague, J. J. 1982. Ice-free conditions on the Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia, at the height of the late Wisconsin glaciation. Science 218 (4573), 675–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, R. F. & Lines, R. 1959. Provenance studies: Sitka spruce. Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research 1958, pp. 55–57. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar