Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:32:51.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative Investigations in Marine Biology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Ronald Currie
Affiliation:
Dunstaffnage Marine Research Laboratory, Oban, Argyll
Get access

Synopsis

Early man's interest in marine organisms was no doubt essentially gastronomic. Ample testimony to his predilection for shellfish exists in prehistoric middens in many parts of the world. From the earliest days of history, however, we find evidence of a more philosophical interest. Aristotle (384–322 b.c.), for example, described more or less accurately about 150 species of fish and other marine organisms (Tizard et al. 1885) and his name is remembered in the ‘Aristotle's lantern', the common name for the masticatory apparatus of the sea urchin.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Beverton, R. J. H. and Holt, S. J., 1957. On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. Fishery Invest., Lond., (II), 19.Google Scholar
Fleming, R. H., 1939. The control of diatom populations by grazing. J. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 14, 210227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaarder, T. and Gran, H. H., 1927. Production of plankton in the Oslo Fjord. Rapp. P.-V. Reun. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 42, 148.Google Scholar
Haberling, W., 1924. Johannes Müller, das Leben des Rheinischen Naturforschers, 501 pp. Leipzig: Akad. Verlag.Google Scholar
Haeckel, E., 1890. Plankton-Studien. Jena. (English translation in 1893, Rep. U.S. Commnr Fish., 1889–91, 565–611.Google Scholar
Harvey, H. W., 1934. Measurement of phytoplankton population. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 19, 761773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensen, V., 1895. Methodik der Untersuchungen. Ergebn. Atlant. Ozean Plankton Exped. Humboldt-Stift., l.B.Google Scholar
Hensen, V., 1897. Nordsee-Expedition, 1895. Wiss. Meeresunters. Kiel, 2, (2).Google Scholar
Johnstone, J., 1908. Conditions of Life in the Sea. 332 pp. C.U.P.Google Scholar
Jönsson, B., 1903. Assimilations versuche bei verschiedener Meerestiefen. Nyt Mag. Naturvid., 41, 122.Google Scholar
Margalef, R., 1968. Perspectives in Ecological Theory, 111 pp. Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, S. M. and Orr, A. P., 1928. The photosynthesis of diatom cultures in the sea. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 15, 321364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porep, R., 1970. Der Physiologe und Planktonforscher Victor Hensen (1835–1924). Sein Leben und sein Werk. Kieler Beiträge zur Geschichte der Medizin und Pharmazie Heft 9, 147 pp.Google Scholar
Richards, F. A. and Thompson, T. G., 1952. The estimation and characterisation of plankton populations by pigment analysis II. A spectrophotometric method for the estimation of plankton pigments. J. Mar. Res., 11, 156172.Google Scholar
Riley, G. A., Stommel, H. and Bumpus, D. F., 1949. Quantitative ecology of the plankton of the western North Atlantic. Bull. Bingham Oceanogr. Coll., 12 (3).Google Scholar
Scoresby, W., 1820. An Account of the Arctic Regions with a History and Description of the Northern Whale-fishery. Edinburgh: Constable.Google Scholar
SteemannNielsen, E. Nielsen, E., 1952. The use of radioactive carbon (C14) for measuring organic production in the sea. J. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 18, 117140.Google Scholar
Tizard, T. H., Moseley, H. N., Buchanan, J. Y. and Murray, J., 1885. Narrative of the cruise of H.M.S. Challenger. Rep. Sclent. Res. Voy. HMS Challenger, Narrative—1 (1).Google Scholar
Wilson, G. and Geikie, A., 1861. Memoir of Edward Forbes, F.R.S., 589 pp. Edinburgh: Macmillan.Google Scholar