Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:41:02.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Primary Productivity of Phytoplankton in Loch Leven, Kinross

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Margaret E. Bindloss
Margaret E. Bindloss
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy, Edinburgh.
Get access

Synopsis

Photosynthetic productivity of phytoplankton in Loch Leven was studied over a 4-year period (1968–71), using the oxygen light and dark bottle technique. Marked seasonal changes in hourly and daily rates of gross photosynthetic productivity are described within the range 0·02 to 1·59 g O2/m2.h and 0·4 to 21·0 g O2/m2.day respectively. Hourly rates are shown to be relatively insensitive to variations in surface light intensity, whereas daily rates are influenced to a considerable extent by the duration of incident radiation (daylength).

The phytoplankton itself exerts a dominant influence on underwater light penetration, accounting for ca 75 per cent of light extinction at highest crop densities. This self-shading effect contributes to the poor correlation observed between crop density and areal gross productivity. The chlorophyll a content per unit area in the euphotic zone often approached its estimated theoretical limit of 430 mg/m2.

In general, increase in photosynthetic capacity (per unit content of chlorophyll a) accompanied increase in water temperature. During certain periods an inverse relationship between photosynthetic capacity and population density was evident. Reduction in photosynthetic capacity is attributed, in part, to the high pH values (> 9·5) with concomitant CO2-depIetion associated with dense phytoplankton crops.

Estimates of net photosynthetic productivity were frequently zero or negative, even over periods when algal populations were increasing and dissolved oxygen and pH values were above their respective air-equilibrium values. Underestimation of gross photosynthesis due to photochemical oxidation, photorespiration or the use of stationary bottles could not account for this apparent anomaly. The most probable sources of error in the estimates of net photosynthetic productivity are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 74 , 1974 , pp. 157 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Bailey-Watts, A. E., 1974. The algal plankton of Loch Leven, Kinross. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, 74, 135–156.Google Scholar
Bindloss, M. E., 1974. Primary productivity of phytoplankton in Loch Leven, Kinross, Scotland. Ph.D. thesis. Univ. Edinb. (in preparation).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bindloss, M. E., Holden, A. V., Bailey-Watts, A. E., and Smith, I. R., 1972. Phytoplankton production, chemical and physical conditions in Loch Leven. Proc. IBP-UNESCO Symp. on Productivity Problems of Freshwater, Kazimierz Dolny, 1970. 639–659.Google Scholar
Dye, J. F., 1952. Calculation of effect of temperature on pH, free carbon dioxide, and the three forms of alkalinity. J. Am. Wat. Wks Ass., 44, 356–372.Google Scholar
Ganf, G. G., 1972. The regulation of net primary production in Lake George, Uganda, East Africa. Proc. IBP-UNESCO Symp. on Productivity Problems of Freshwater, Kazimierz Dolny, 1970. 693–708.Google Scholar
Goldman, J. C., Porcella, D. G., Middlebrooks, E. J., and Toerien, D. F., 1972. Review paper. The effect of carbon on algal growth—its relationship to eutrophication. Wat. Res., 6, 637–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golterman, H. L., 1971. The determination of mineralization losses in correlation with the estimation of net primary production with the oxygen method and chemical inhibitors. Freshwat. Biol., 1, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepher, B., 1962. Primary production in fish ponds and its application to fertilization experiments. Limnol. Oceanogr., 7, 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E., 1957. A Treatise on Limnology, 1. Geography, Physics and Chemistry. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Karlgren, L., 1962. Vattenkemiska analysmetoder. Uppsala: Limnol Inst.Google Scholar
Kern, D. M., 1960. The hydration of carbon dioxide. J. Chem. Educ., 37, 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kok, B., 1952. On the efficiency of Chlorella growth. Acta Bot. Neerl., 1, 445–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalczewski, A., and Lack, T. J., 1971. Primary production and respiration of the phytoplankton of the Rivers Thames and Kennet at Reading. Freshwat. Biol., 1, 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lex, M., Silvester, W. B., and Stewart, W. D. P., 1972. Photorespiration and nitrogenase activity in the blue-green alga, Anabaena cylindrica. Proc. Roy. Soc. B., 180, 87–102.Google ScholarPubMed
Lorenzen, C. J., 1967. Determination of chlorophyll and pheo-pigments: spectrophotometric equations. Limnol. Oceanogr., 12, 343–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, C. D., Shah, N., and Strickland, J. D. H., 1964. Marine phytoplankton photosynthesis as a function of light intensity: a comparison of methods. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., 21, 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, N. C., 1970. Changes in the fauna and flora of a nutrient enriched lake. Hydrobiologia, 35, 545–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, N. C., 1972. Productivity studies at Loch Leven (a shallow nutrient rich lowland lake) Proc. IBP-UNESCO Symp. on Productivity Problems of Freshwater, Kazimierz Dolny, 1970. 183–205.Google Scholar
Moss, B., 1967a. A spectrophotometric method for the estimation of percentage degradation of chlorophylls to pheo-pigments in extracts of algae. Limnol. Oceanogr., 12, 335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, B., 1967b. A note on the estimation of chlorophyll a in freshwater algal communities. Limnol. Oceanogr., 12, 340–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, J. A., 1968. The mechanism of photosynthetic use of bicarbonate by Hydrodictyon africanum. J. Exp. Bot., 19, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, J. A., 1970. Exogenous inorganic carbon sources in plant photosynthesis. Biol. Rev., 45, 167–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodhe, W., 1969. Crystallisation of eutrophication concepts in Northern Europe. In Eutrophication: causes, consequences, correctives, 50–64. Washington : N.A.S.Google Scholar
Rodhe, W., Vollenweider, R. A., and Nauwerck, A., 1958. The primary production and standing crop of phytoplankton. In Perspectives in Marine Biology (Ed. Buzzati-Traverso, A. A.), 299–322. Univ. Calif. Press.Google Scholar
Ryther, J. H., 1954. The ratio of photosynthesis to respiration in marine plankton algae and its effect upon the measurement of productivity. Deep Sea Res., 2, 134–139.Google Scholar
Ryther, J. H., 1959. Potential productivity of the sea. Science, N.Y., 130, 602–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryther, J. H., and Guillard, , 1962. Studies of marine planktonic diatoms III. Some effects of temperature on respiration of five species. Can. J. Microbiol., 8, 447–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saijo, Y., and Ichimura, S., 1962. Some considerations on photosynthesis of phytoplankton from the point of view of productivity measurement. J. Oceanogr. Soc. Japan, 20, 687–693.Google Scholar
Smith, I. R., 1974. The structure and physical environment of Loch Leven, Kinross. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, 74, 81–100.Google Scholar
Smithsonian Meteorological Tables, 1951. 6th edn., Washington.Google Scholar
Sreenivasan, A., 1972. Energy transformations through primary productivity and fish production in some tropical freshwater impoundments and ponds. Proc. IBP-VNESCO Symp. on Productivity Problems of Freshwater, Kazimierz Dolny, 1970. 505–514.Google Scholar
Steel, J. A., 1972. The application of fundamental limnological research in water supply system design and management. Symp. Zool. Soc. Land., 29, 41–67.Google Scholar
Steemann Nielsen, E., 1954. On organic production in the oceans. J. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, 19, 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steemann Nielsen, E., and Hansen, V. K., 1959. Measurements with the carbon-14 technique of the respiration rates in natural populations of phytoplankton. Deep Sea Res., 5, 222–233.Google Scholar
Stumm, W., and Morgan, J. J., 1970. Aquatic chemistry. 583 pp. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Talling, J. F., 1957a. Photosynthetic characteristics of some freshwater plankton diatoms in relation to underwater radiation. New Phytol., 56, 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talling, J. F., 1957b. The phytoplankton population as a compound photosynthetic system. New Phytol., 56, 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talling, J. F., 1960. Self-shading effects in natural populations of a planctonic diatom. Wett. Leben, 12, 235–242.Google Scholar
Talling, J. F., 1965. The photosynthetic activity of phytoplankton in East African Lakes. Int. Revue. Ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr., 50, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talling, J. F., 1970. Generalized and specialized features of phytoplankton as a form of photosynthetic cover. Proc. IBP/PP Tech. Meet., Třeboň, Czechoslovakia, 431–445. Wageningen: PUDOC.Google Scholar
Talling, J. F., 1971. The underwater light climate as a controlling factor in the production ecology of freshwater phytoplankton. Mitt. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 19, 214–243.Google Scholar
Talling, J. F., and Driver, D., 1963. Some problems in the estimation of chlorophyll a in phytoplankton. Proc. Conf. Primary Productivity Measurement, Marine and Freshwater, Hawaii, 1961. U.S.A.E.C., TID-7633, 142–146.Google Scholar
Tamiya, H., 1957. Mass culture of algae. A. Rev. Pl. Physiol., 8, 309–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullrich-Eberius, C. I., and Simonis, W., 1970. Der Einfluss von Natrium–und Kaliumionen auf die Phosphataufnahme bei Ankistrodesmus braunii. Planta, 93, 214–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollenweider, R. A., 1968. Scientific fundamentals of the eutrophication of lakes and flowing waters, with particular reference to nitrogen and phosphorus as factors in eutrophication. OECD Tech. Rep. Wat. Management Res., DAS/CSI 68.27.Google Scholar
Vollenweider, R. A., 1969. A manual on methods for measuring primary production in aquatic environments. I.B.P. Handb., 12.Google Scholar
Winberg, G. G., 1971. Symbols, Units and Conversion Factors in Studies of Freshwater Productivity. London: I.B.P.Google Scholar
Wright, J. C., 1959. Limnology of Canyon Ferry Reservoir II. Phytoplankton standing crop and primary production. Limnol. Oceanogr., 4, 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zobell, C. E., and Anderson, Q., 1936. Observations on the multiplication of bacteria in different volumes of stored sea water and the influence of oxygen tension and solid surfaces. Biol. Bull., 71, 324–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar